高度自闭症患者在多轮信任游戏中的非典型动态信任学习

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Xudong Zhao , Wenrui Li , Aijia Xu , Xintong Li , Wendian Shi
{"title":"高度自闭症患者在多轮信任游戏中的非典型动态信任学习","authors":"Xudong Zhao ,&nbsp;Wenrui Li ,&nbsp;Aijia Xu ,&nbsp;Xintong Li ,&nbsp;Wendian Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding the trust-building process, especially in contexts requiring the integration of multiple trustworthiness cues, is a fundamental aspect of social interactions among individuals with high autistic traits (ATs). It can offer valuable insights into the social functioning of these individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Participants with high and low ATs (N = 120; 30 in each group for two experiments) completed a 10-round trust game that embedded various trustworthiness cues, including reputation, advice (Experiment 1 = direct advice; Experiment 2 = social-emotional advice), and reciprocity. Linear mixed-effects models with investment rates as the dependent variable were used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Methodologically, the experimental results elucidated the fundamental characteristics of dynamic trust formation within the context of multidimensional trust information. Furthermore, High-AT individuals showed assigned less weight to reciprocity but relied heavily on reputation, and exhibited maladaptive advice-taking. Unlike low-AT individuals, high-AT individuals did not adaptively reduce reputational effect over rounds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings highlight the unique challenges faced by individuals with high ATs when navigating complex social interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48255,"journal":{"name":"Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atypical dynamic trust learning in individuals with high autistic traits in a multi-round trust game with multiple trustworthiness cues\",\"authors\":\"Xudong Zhao ,&nbsp;Wenrui Li ,&nbsp;Aijia Xu ,&nbsp;Xintong Li ,&nbsp;Wendian Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding the trust-building process, especially in contexts requiring the integration of multiple trustworthiness cues, is a fundamental aspect of social interactions among individuals with high autistic traits (ATs). It can offer valuable insights into the social functioning of these individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Participants with high and low ATs (N = 120; 30 in each group for two experiments) completed a 10-round trust game that embedded various trustworthiness cues, including reputation, advice (Experiment 1 = direct advice; Experiment 2 = social-emotional advice), and reciprocity. Linear mixed-effects models with investment rates as the dependent variable were used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Methodologically, the experimental results elucidated the fundamental characteristics of dynamic trust formation within the context of multidimensional trust information. Furthermore, High-AT individuals showed assigned less weight to reciprocity but relied heavily on reputation, and exhibited maladaptive advice-taking. Unlike low-AT individuals, high-AT individuals did not adaptively reduce reputational effect over rounds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings highlight the unique challenges faced by individuals with high ATs when navigating complex social interactions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750946724001569\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750946724001569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景了解信任的建立过程,尤其是在需要整合多种可信度线索的情境中,是高度自闭症特质(ATs)个体之间社会互动的一个基本方面。方法高自闭症特质和低自闭症特质的参与者(人数=120;两个实验中每组各30人)完成一个10轮信任游戏,游戏中包含各种可信度线索,包括声誉、建议(实验1=直接建议;实验2=社会情感建议)和互惠。实验结果阐明了多维信任信息背景下动态信任形成的基本特征。此外,高AT个体对互惠的重视程度较低,但对声誉的依赖程度较高,并表现出不适应性的建议接受。与低AT个体不同的是,高AT个体并没有随着回合的增加而适应性地降低声誉效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atypical dynamic trust learning in individuals with high autistic traits in a multi-round trust game with multiple trustworthiness cues

Background

Understanding the trust-building process, especially in contexts requiring the integration of multiple trustworthiness cues, is a fundamental aspect of social interactions among individuals with high autistic traits (ATs). It can offer valuable insights into the social functioning of these individuals.

Method

Participants with high and low ATs (N = 120; 30 in each group for two experiments) completed a 10-round trust game that embedded various trustworthiness cues, including reputation, advice (Experiment 1 = direct advice; Experiment 2 = social-emotional advice), and reciprocity. Linear mixed-effects models with investment rates as the dependent variable were used to analyze the data.

Results

Methodologically, the experimental results elucidated the fundamental characteristics of dynamic trust formation within the context of multidimensional trust information. Furthermore, High-AT individuals showed assigned less weight to reciprocity but relied heavily on reputation, and exhibited maladaptive advice-taking. Unlike low-AT individuals, high-AT individuals did not adaptively reduce reputational effect over rounds.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the unique challenges faced by individuals with high ATs when navigating complex social interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders (RASD) publishes high quality empirical articles and reviews that contribute to a better understanding of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) at all levels of description; genetic, neurobiological, cognitive, and behavioral. The primary focus of the journal is to bridge the gap between basic research at these levels, and the practical questions and difficulties that are faced by individuals with ASD and their families, as well as carers, educators and clinicians. In addition, the journal encourages submissions on topics that remain under-researched in the field. We know shamefully little about the causes and consequences of the significant language and general intellectual impairments that characterize half of all individuals with ASD. We know even less about the challenges that women with ASD face and less still about the needs of individuals with ASD as they grow older. Medical and psychological co-morbidities and the complications they bring with them for the diagnosis and treatment of ASD represents another area of relatively little research. At RASD we are committed to promoting high-quality and rigorous research on all of these issues, and we look forward to receiving many excellent submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信