两个具有地区代表性的城市印第安人乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查及早期检测的个人层面决定因素

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"两个具有地区代表性的城市印第安人乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查及早期检测的个人层面决定因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Region-specific data on individual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening or early testing in diverse Indian populations are limited.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the prevalence and individual determinants of uptake of breast and/or cervical cancer screening or testing among women aged 30–69 years in regionally representative populations of two large Indian cities: New Delhi and Chennai.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an analysis of the cross-sectional data (2016–2017) nested within the Centre for Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia cohort, established in 2010–2011 with 12,271 participants (5365 in New Delhi; 6906 in Chennai). Among 3310 women participants, we evaluated the associations of demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, medical, psychosocial, and reproductive factors with breast and/or cervical cancer screening or testing using multivariable logistic regression models with results expressed as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At any point prior to 2016–2017, 193 women self-reported having undergone evaluations for breast and/or cervical cancer. The reasons for evaluation were ‘general examination’ or ‘physician’s advice’ (i.e., screening) or ‘being symptomatic’ (i.e., early testing). The overall prevalence was 5.8% for screening or testing and 2.5% for screening alone. Formal education (OR:1.88; 95% CI:1.12–3.15), high monthly household income (OR:2.27; 95% CI:1.59–3.25) and less ‘fear-of-judgement’ (OR:1.65; 95% CI:1.05–2.58) were positively associated with screening or testing uptake. When screening uptake was analysed separately, the results were generally similar.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings may have important implications for interventions at community-level (e.g., reducing ‘fear-of-judgement’, increasing awareness to screening programs and early symptoms) and health-system level (e.g., opportunistic screening).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524002985/pdfft?md5=f51fd914fc81acbc99fc419116f33e6a&pid=1-s2.0-S2211335524002985-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual-level determinants of breast and cervical cancer screening and early testing in two regionally representative urban Indian populations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Region-specific data on individual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening or early testing in diverse Indian populations are limited.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the prevalence and individual determinants of uptake of breast and/or cervical cancer screening or testing among women aged 30–69 years in regionally representative populations of two large Indian cities: New Delhi and Chennai.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an analysis of the cross-sectional data (2016–2017) nested within the Centre for Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia cohort, established in 2010–2011 with 12,271 participants (5365 in New Delhi; 6906 in Chennai). Among 3310 women participants, we evaluated the associations of demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, medical, psychosocial, and reproductive factors with breast and/or cervical cancer screening or testing using multivariable logistic regression models with results expressed as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At any point prior to 2016–2017, 193 women self-reported having undergone evaluations for breast and/or cervical cancer. The reasons for evaluation were ‘general examination’ or ‘physician’s advice’ (i.e., screening) or ‘being symptomatic’ (i.e., early testing). The overall prevalence was 5.8% for screening or testing and 2.5% for screening alone. Formal education (OR:1.88; 95% CI:1.12–3.15), high monthly household income (OR:2.27; 95% CI:1.59–3.25) and less ‘fear-of-judgement’ (OR:1.65; 95% CI:1.05–2.58) were positively associated with screening or testing uptake. When screening uptake was analysed separately, the results were generally similar.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings may have important implications for interventions at community-level (e.g., reducing ‘fear-of-judgement’, increasing awareness to screening programs and early symptoms) and health-system level (e.g., opportunistic screening).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524002985/pdfft?md5=f51fd914fc81acbc99fc419116f33e6a&pid=1-s2.0-S2211335524002985-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524002985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524002985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言在印度不同人群中,与接受乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查或早期检测相关的个体因素的特定地区数据有限。目的评估印度两个大城市中具有地区代表性的人群中 30-69 岁女性接受乳腺癌和/或宫颈癌筛查或检测的流行率和个体决定因素:方法我们对嵌套在南亚心脏代谢风险降低中心队列中的横截面数据(2016-2017 年)进行了分析,该队列成立于 2010-2011 年,共有 12271 名参与者(新德里 5365 人;钦奈 6906 人)。在 3310 名女性参与者中,我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估了人口统计学、社会经济、生活方式、医疗、社会心理和生殖因素与乳腺癌和/或宫颈癌筛查或检测的相关性,结果以调整后的几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)表示。结果在 2016-2017 年之前的任何时间点,有 193 名女性自称接受过乳腺癌和/或宫颈癌评估。评估原因为 "一般检查 "或 "医生建议"(即筛查)或 "有症状"(即早期检测)。筛查或检测的总体流行率为 5.8%,仅筛查的流行率为 2.5%。正规教育程度(OR:1.88;95% CI:1.12-3.15)、高家庭月收入(OR:2.27;95% CI:1.59-3.25)和较少的 "判断恐惧"(OR:1.65;95% CI:1.05-2.58)与接受筛查或检测呈正相关。我们的研究结果可能对社区层面的干预措施(如减少 "判断恐惧"、提高对筛查项目和早期症状的认识)和医疗系统层面的干预措施(如机会性筛查)具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual-level determinants of breast and cervical cancer screening and early testing in two regionally representative urban Indian populations

Introduction

Region-specific data on individual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening or early testing in diverse Indian populations are limited.

Aim

To assess the prevalence and individual determinants of uptake of breast and/or cervical cancer screening or testing among women aged 30–69 years in regionally representative populations of two large Indian cities: New Delhi and Chennai.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of the cross-sectional data (2016–2017) nested within the Centre for Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia cohort, established in 2010–2011 with 12,271 participants (5365 in New Delhi; 6906 in Chennai). Among 3310 women participants, we evaluated the associations of demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, medical, psychosocial, and reproductive factors with breast and/or cervical cancer screening or testing using multivariable logistic regression models with results expressed as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

At any point prior to 2016–2017, 193 women self-reported having undergone evaluations for breast and/or cervical cancer. The reasons for evaluation were ‘general examination’ or ‘physician’s advice’ (i.e., screening) or ‘being symptomatic’ (i.e., early testing). The overall prevalence was 5.8% for screening or testing and 2.5% for screening alone. Formal education (OR:1.88; 95% CI:1.12–3.15), high monthly household income (OR:2.27; 95% CI:1.59–3.25) and less ‘fear-of-judgement’ (OR:1.65; 95% CI:1.05–2.58) were positively associated with screening or testing uptake. When screening uptake was analysed separately, the results were generally similar.

Conclusion

Our findings may have important implications for interventions at community-level (e.g., reducing ‘fear-of-judgement’, increasing awareness to screening programs and early symptoms) and health-system level (e.g., opportunistic screening).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信