Lindsey Hohmann , Kavon Diggs , Giovanna Valle-Ramos , Jessica Richardson , Haley Phillippe , Chris Correia , Karen Marlowe , Brent I. Fox
{"title":"一项横断面调查,探讨在阿拉巴马州农村和城市环境中实施社区药房阿片类药物咨询和纳洛酮服务的组织准备情况","authors":"Lindsey Hohmann , Kavon Diggs , Giovanna Valle-Ramos , Jessica Richardson , Haley Phillippe , Chris Correia , Karen Marlowe , Brent I. Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Rural US regions experience lower naloxone dispensing rates compared to urban counterparts, particularly in Alabama. In light of this, strategies to enhance opioid counseling and naloxone services (OCN) in rural community pharmacies are critical. However, organizational readiness to implement OCN in rural versus urban contexts where resource networks may differ is not well understood.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to explore organizational readiness and identify factors associated with implementation of OCN in rural versus urban Alabama community pharmacies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Alabama community pharmacists and technicians were recruited to participate in an anonymous online cross-sectional survey via email. The survey instrument was adapted from the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA). Primary outcome measures included 3 overarching ORCA domains (Evidence, Context, and Facilitation) with 19 subscales regarding OCN implementation readiness, measured via 5-point Likert-type scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Secondarily, pharmacy OCN implementation status (implementer, non-implementer, or in-development) was measured via multiple-choice (1-item). Differences in mean domain and subscale scores between rural and urban pharmacies were evaluated using Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> tests and influential factors affecting OCN implementation status were assessed via logistic regression (alpha = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 171 respondents, the majority were pharmacists (78.6 %) in urban locations (57.1 %). Mean[SD] clinical experience evidence (Evidence) (3.98[0.69] vs 3.74[0.71]; <em>p</em> = 0.029), staff culture (Context) (4.04[0.66] vs 3.85[0.76]; <em>p</em> = 0.047), service measurement goals (Context) (3.92[0.77] vs 3.66[0.79]; <em>p</em> = 0.034), and senior management characteristics (Facilitation) (3.87[0.72] vs 3.71[0.66]; <em>p</em> = 0.045) subscales were higher in urban versus rural pharmacies. Notably, 66.7 % of pharmacies were current OCN implementers, and pharmacies with higher ORCA context domain scores had 3.230 greater odds of implementing or being in the process of developing OCN (95 % CI = 1.116–9.350; <em>p</em> = 0.031).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Organizational readiness to implement OCN was higher among urban versus rural pharmacies in terms of perceived strength of clinical evidence, staff culture, service measurement goals, and senior management characteristics. Future research may leverage key contextual factors to enhance OCN implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001008/pdfft?md5=3814d34321a00dfde685818657938352&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624001008-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey Hohmann , Kavon Diggs , Giovanna Valle-Ramos , Jessica Richardson , Haley Phillippe , Chris Correia , Karen Marlowe , Brent I. Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Rural US regions experience lower naloxone dispensing rates compared to urban counterparts, particularly in Alabama. In light of this, strategies to enhance opioid counseling and naloxone services (OCN) in rural community pharmacies are critical. However, organizational readiness to implement OCN in rural versus urban contexts where resource networks may differ is not well understood.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to explore organizational readiness and identify factors associated with implementation of OCN in rural versus urban Alabama community pharmacies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Alabama community pharmacists and technicians were recruited to participate in an anonymous online cross-sectional survey via email. The survey instrument was adapted from the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA). Primary outcome measures included 3 overarching ORCA domains (Evidence, Context, and Facilitation) with 19 subscales regarding OCN implementation readiness, measured via 5-point Likert-type scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Secondarily, pharmacy OCN implementation status (implementer, non-implementer, or in-development) was measured via multiple-choice (1-item). Differences in mean domain and subscale scores between rural and urban pharmacies were evaluated using Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> tests and influential factors affecting OCN implementation status were assessed via logistic regression (alpha = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 171 respondents, the majority were pharmacists (78.6 %) in urban locations (57.1 %). Mean[SD] clinical experience evidence (Evidence) (3.98[0.69] vs 3.74[0.71]; <em>p</em> = 0.029), staff culture (Context) (4.04[0.66] vs 3.85[0.76]; <em>p</em> = 0.047), service measurement goals (Context) (3.92[0.77] vs 3.66[0.79]; <em>p</em> = 0.034), and senior management characteristics (Facilitation) (3.87[0.72] vs 3.71[0.66]; <em>p</em> = 0.045) subscales were higher in urban versus rural pharmacies. Notably, 66.7 % of pharmacies were current OCN implementers, and pharmacies with higher ORCA context domain scores had 3.230 greater odds of implementing or being in the process of developing OCN (95 % CI = 1.116–9.350; <em>p</em> = 0.031).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Organizational readiness to implement OCN was higher among urban versus rural pharmacies in terms of perceived strength of clinical evidence, staff culture, service measurement goals, and senior management characteristics. Future research may leverage key contextual factors to enhance OCN implementation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001008/pdfft?md5=3814d34321a00dfde685818657938352&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624001008-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景美国农村地区的纳洛酮发放率低于城市地区,尤其是在阿拉巴马州。有鉴于此,加强农村社区药房阿片类药物咨询和纳洛酮服务(OCN)的策略至关重要。本研究旨在探索组织准备情况,并确定与阿拉巴马州农村社区药房和城市社区药房实施 OCN 相关的因素。方法:通过电子邮件招募阿拉巴马州社区药剂师和技术人员参与匿名在线横断面调查。调查工具改编自组织变革准备度评估 (ORCA)。主要结果测量包括 ORCA 的 3 个总体领域(证据、环境和促进)以及有关 OCN 实施准备情况的 19 个子量表,通过 5 点李克特量表进行测量(1 = 非常不同意,5 = 非常同意)。其次,药房 OCN 实施状况(已实施、未实施或正在开发)通过多项选择(1 个项目)进行测量。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估了农村药房和城市药房在领域和分量表平均得分上的差异,并通过逻辑回归(α = 0.05)评估了影响 OCN 实施状况的影响因素。平均[标度]临床经验证据(Evidence)(3.98[0.69] vs 3.74[0.71];p = 0.029)、员工文化(Context)(4.04[0.66] vs 3.85[0.76];p = 0.047)、服务衡量目标(Context)(3.92[0.77] vs 3.66[0.79];p = 0.034)和高级管理层特征(促进)(3.87[0.72] vs 3.71[0.66];p = 0.045)分量表中,城市药房高于农村药房。值得注意的是,66.7% 的药房目前正在实施 OCN,而 ORCA 情境域得分较高的药房实施或正在开发 OCN 的几率要高出 3.230(95 % CI = 1.116-9.350; p = 0.031)。未来的研究可能会利用关键的环境因素来加强 OCN 的实施。
A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama
Background
Rural US regions experience lower naloxone dispensing rates compared to urban counterparts, particularly in Alabama. In light of this, strategies to enhance opioid counseling and naloxone services (OCN) in rural community pharmacies are critical. However, organizational readiness to implement OCN in rural versus urban contexts where resource networks may differ is not well understood.
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to explore organizational readiness and identify factors associated with implementation of OCN in rural versus urban Alabama community pharmacies.
Methods
Alabama community pharmacists and technicians were recruited to participate in an anonymous online cross-sectional survey via email. The survey instrument was adapted from the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA). Primary outcome measures included 3 overarching ORCA domains (Evidence, Context, and Facilitation) with 19 subscales regarding OCN implementation readiness, measured via 5-point Likert-type scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Secondarily, pharmacy OCN implementation status (implementer, non-implementer, or in-development) was measured via multiple-choice (1-item). Differences in mean domain and subscale scores between rural and urban pharmacies were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U tests and influential factors affecting OCN implementation status were assessed via logistic regression (alpha = 0.05).
Results
Of 171 respondents, the majority were pharmacists (78.6 %) in urban locations (57.1 %). Mean[SD] clinical experience evidence (Evidence) (3.98[0.69] vs 3.74[0.71]; p = 0.029), staff culture (Context) (4.04[0.66] vs 3.85[0.76]; p = 0.047), service measurement goals (Context) (3.92[0.77] vs 3.66[0.79]; p = 0.034), and senior management characteristics (Facilitation) (3.87[0.72] vs 3.71[0.66]; p = 0.045) subscales were higher in urban versus rural pharmacies. Notably, 66.7 % of pharmacies were current OCN implementers, and pharmacies with higher ORCA context domain scores had 3.230 greater odds of implementing or being in the process of developing OCN (95 % CI = 1.116–9.350; p = 0.031).
Conclusion
Organizational readiness to implement OCN was higher among urban versus rural pharmacies in terms of perceived strength of clinical evidence, staff culture, service measurement goals, and senior management characteristics. Future research may leverage key contextual factors to enhance OCN implementation.