材料研究中的机器学习:过去十年的发展与未来的挑战

IF 12.2 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Anubhav Jain
{"title":"材料研究中的机器学习:过去十年的发展与未来的挑战","authors":"Anubhav Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.cossms.2024.101189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The number of studies that apply machine learning (ML) to materials science has been growing at a rate of approximately 1.67 times per year over the past decade. In this review, I examine this growth in various contexts. First, I present an analysis of the most commonly used tools (software, databases, materials science methods, and ML methods) used within papers that apply ML to materials science. The analysis demonstrates that despite the growth of deep learning techniques, the use of classical machine learning is still dominant as a whole. It also demonstrates how new research can effectively build upon past research, particular in the domain of ML models trained on density functional theory calculation data. Next, I present the progression of best scores as a function of time on the matbench materials science benchmark for formation enthalpy prediction. In particular, a dramatic improvement of 7 times reduction in error is obtained when progressing from feature-based methods that use conventional ML (random forest, support vector regression, <em>etc.</em>) to the use of graph neural network techniques. Finally, I provide views on future challenges and opportunities, focusing on data size and complexity, extrapolation, interpretation, access, and relevance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":295,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101189"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135902862400055X/pdfft?md5=daf1f5860dd3d81b7ae5c13746fc62e9&pid=1-s2.0-S135902862400055X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning in materials research: Developments over the last decade and challenges for the future\",\"authors\":\"Anubhav Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cossms.2024.101189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The number of studies that apply machine learning (ML) to materials science has been growing at a rate of approximately 1.67 times per year over the past decade. In this review, I examine this growth in various contexts. First, I present an analysis of the most commonly used tools (software, databases, materials science methods, and ML methods) used within papers that apply ML to materials science. The analysis demonstrates that despite the growth of deep learning techniques, the use of classical machine learning is still dominant as a whole. It also demonstrates how new research can effectively build upon past research, particular in the domain of ML models trained on density functional theory calculation data. Next, I present the progression of best scores as a function of time on the matbench materials science benchmark for formation enthalpy prediction. In particular, a dramatic improvement of 7 times reduction in error is obtained when progressing from feature-based methods that use conventional ML (random forest, support vector regression, <em>etc.</em>) to the use of graph neural network techniques. Finally, I provide views on future challenges and opportunities, focusing on data size and complexity, extrapolation, interpretation, access, and relevance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135902862400055X/pdfft?md5=daf1f5860dd3d81b7ae5c13746fc62e9&pid=1-s2.0-S135902862400055X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135902862400055X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135902862400055X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,将机器学习(ML)应用于材料科学的研究数量以每年约 1.67 倍的速度增长。在这篇综述中,我将从多个方面考察这一增长。首先,我分析了将机器学习应用于材料科学的论文中最常用的工具(软件、数据库、材料科学方法和 ML 方法)。分析表明,尽管深度学习技术在不断发展,但从整体上看,经典机器学习的使用仍占主导地位。它还展示了新研究如何有效地借鉴过去的研究,尤其是在根据密度泛函理论计算数据训练的 ML 模型领域。接下来,我介绍了在 matbench 材料科学基准中,随着时间的推移,最佳分数在形成焓预测方面的进展情况。特别是,从使用传统 ML(随机森林、支持向量回归等)的基于特征的方法到使用图神经网络技术,误差大幅减少了 7 倍。最后,我就未来的挑战和机遇发表了看法,重点是数据规模和复杂性、外推、解释、访问和相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning in materials research: Developments over the last decade and challenges for the future

The number of studies that apply machine learning (ML) to materials science has been growing at a rate of approximately 1.67 times per year over the past decade. In this review, I examine this growth in various contexts. First, I present an analysis of the most commonly used tools (software, databases, materials science methods, and ML methods) used within papers that apply ML to materials science. The analysis demonstrates that despite the growth of deep learning techniques, the use of classical machine learning is still dominant as a whole. It also demonstrates how new research can effectively build upon past research, particular in the domain of ML models trained on density functional theory calculation data. Next, I present the progression of best scores as a function of time on the matbench materials science benchmark for formation enthalpy prediction. In particular, a dramatic improvement of 7 times reduction in error is obtained when progressing from feature-based methods that use conventional ML (random forest, support vector regression, etc.) to the use of graph neural network techniques. Finally, I provide views on future challenges and opportunities, focusing on data size and complexity, extrapolation, interpretation, access, and relevance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science
Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
21.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
41
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Title: Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science Journal Overview: Aims to provide a snapshot of the latest research and advances in materials science Publishes six issues per year, each containing reviews covering exciting and developing areas of materials science Each issue comprises 2-3 sections of reviews commissioned by international researchers who are experts in their fields Provides materials scientists with the opportunity to stay informed about current developments in their own and related areas of research Promotes cross-fertilization of ideas across an increasingly interdisciplinary field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信