对冲可再生能源购电协议

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Juan Ignacio Peña, Rosa Rodríguez, Silvia Mayoral
{"title":"对冲可再生能源购电协议","authors":"Juan Ignacio Peña,&nbsp;Rosa Rodríguez,&nbsp;Silvia Mayoral","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper uses closed-form and copula models to analyze short-term and medium-term financial instruments' hedging effectiveness and tail risk reduction in long-term renewable Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Using monthly and yearly exchange-traded electricity futures, we study PPA contracts from California, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. The overall low or negative hedging effectiveness and inconsistent tail risk reductions indicate that traditional linear hedging strategies may not consistently achieve the desired risk mitigation. Monthly contracts are generally more effective in California, Germany, and France, while yearly contracts are preferable in Italy and Spain, highlighting the need for market-specific hedging strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101513"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002220/pdfft?md5=df122c8c06321f02ae79db851ae04367&pid=1-s2.0-S2211467X24002220-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hedging renewable power purchase agreements\",\"authors\":\"Juan Ignacio Peña,&nbsp;Rosa Rodríguez,&nbsp;Silvia Mayoral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper uses closed-form and copula models to analyze short-term and medium-term financial instruments' hedging effectiveness and tail risk reduction in long-term renewable Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Using monthly and yearly exchange-traded electricity futures, we study PPA contracts from California, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. The overall low or negative hedging effectiveness and inconsistent tail risk reductions indicate that traditional linear hedging strategies may not consistently achieve the desired risk mitigation. Monthly contracts are generally more effective in California, Germany, and France, while yearly contracts are preferable in Italy and Spain, highlighting the need for market-specific hedging strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002220/pdfft?md5=df122c8c06321f02ae79db851ae04367&pid=1-s2.0-S2211467X24002220-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002220\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文使用封闭式模型和共轭模型分析了短期和中期金融工具的对冲效果以及长期可再生能源购电协议(PPA)的尾部风险降低情况。我们利用交易所交易的月度和年度电力期货,研究了加利福尼亚、德国、法国、意大利和西班牙的 PPA 合同。总体而言,套期保值效果较低或为负值,且尾部风险降低幅度不一致,这表明传统的线性套期保值策略可能无法持续实现预期的风险降低效果。在加利福尼亚、德国和法国,按月签订的合同通常更为有效,而在意大利和西班牙,按年签订的合同更为可取,这凸显了针对特定市场制定对冲策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hedging renewable power purchase agreements

This paper uses closed-form and copula models to analyze short-term and medium-term financial instruments' hedging effectiveness and tail risk reduction in long-term renewable Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Using monthly and yearly exchange-traded electricity futures, we study PPA contracts from California, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. The overall low or negative hedging effectiveness and inconsistent tail risk reductions indicate that traditional linear hedging strategies may not consistently achieve the desired risk mitigation. Monthly contracts are generally more effective in California, Germany, and France, while yearly contracts are preferable in Italy and Spain, highlighting the need for market-specific hedging strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信