Mohammad Ostadi , Leslie Bromberg , Guiyan Zang , Daniel R. Cohn , Emre Gençer
{"title":"通过生物质气化和天然气转化灵活协同生产甲醇","authors":"Mohammad Ostadi , Leslie Bromberg , Guiyan Zang , Daniel R. Cohn , Emre Gençer","doi":"10.1016/j.clce.2024.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable liquid fuels are essential for decarbonization of various means of transportation which are challenging to address through electrification or hydrogen use. A possible method for producing low-carbon liquid fuel is through the thermochemical biomass to liquid (BTL) process. In this study, we conduct a technoeconomic-environmental analysis of two processes which take advantage of integration of natural gas reforming and biomass gasification, with the objective of improving the economics. By integrating H<sub>2</sub>-rich syngas (a mixture of H<sub>2</sub>/CO) obtained from natural gas reforming with carbon-rich syngas from biomass gasification, we harness synergistic effects. This combination allows us to achieve the optimal H<sub>2</sub>/CO ratio required for methanol synthesis, while also ensuring efficient carbon utilization. In the first design, natural gas is reformed in an autothermal reformer (ATR) to produce syngas. A Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) is utilized to supply the O<sub>2</sub> for both gasification and reforming processes. The H<sub>2</sub> produced by the SOEC adjusts the H<sub>2</sub> content in the syngas before the methanol synthesis reactor. In the second design, natural gas is reformed in a gas-heated-reformer (GHR) before an ATR, while an Air Separation Unit (ASU) produces the O<sub>2</sub> for the process. As a benchmark, the economics and flexible operation of both processes are compared to a conventional BTL process. In addition, the techno-economic impact of operating in biomass-only or natural gas-only modes are investigated. For a 134 MW<sub>th</sub> plant with 50 % of entering carbon from biomass, the levelized cost of methanol (LCOMeOH) of ATR+SOEC case is 34 % higher than the BTL reference case, while that of ATR+GHR case is 24 % lower than the BTL reference case. A lifecycle analysis (LCA) is conducted for these designs. Utilizing renewable electricity and 50 % biogenic carbon, the ATR+SOEC case emits 908 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH for a 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP), while the ATR+GHR case emits 721 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH. For a 20-year GWP, these emissions are 1055 and 915 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH, respectively. These emissions correspond to more than 50 % reduction in LCA emissions when compared to natural gas based LCA emissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100251,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782324000056/pdfft?md5=a66e9e4ebf5394b1fbf1420dce8c099a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772782324000056-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible and synergistic methanol production via biomass gasification and natural gas reforming\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Ostadi , Leslie Bromberg , Guiyan Zang , Daniel R. Cohn , Emre Gençer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clce.2024.100120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainable liquid fuels are essential for decarbonization of various means of transportation which are challenging to address through electrification or hydrogen use. A possible method for producing low-carbon liquid fuel is through the thermochemical biomass to liquid (BTL) process. In this study, we conduct a technoeconomic-environmental analysis of two processes which take advantage of integration of natural gas reforming and biomass gasification, with the objective of improving the economics. By integrating H<sub>2</sub>-rich syngas (a mixture of H<sub>2</sub>/CO) obtained from natural gas reforming with carbon-rich syngas from biomass gasification, we harness synergistic effects. This combination allows us to achieve the optimal H<sub>2</sub>/CO ratio required for methanol synthesis, while also ensuring efficient carbon utilization. In the first design, natural gas is reformed in an autothermal reformer (ATR) to produce syngas. A Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) is utilized to supply the O<sub>2</sub> for both gasification and reforming processes. The H<sub>2</sub> produced by the SOEC adjusts the H<sub>2</sub> content in the syngas before the methanol synthesis reactor. In the second design, natural gas is reformed in a gas-heated-reformer (GHR) before an ATR, while an Air Separation Unit (ASU) produces the O<sub>2</sub> for the process. As a benchmark, the economics and flexible operation of both processes are compared to a conventional BTL process. In addition, the techno-economic impact of operating in biomass-only or natural gas-only modes are investigated. For a 134 MW<sub>th</sub> plant with 50 % of entering carbon from biomass, the levelized cost of methanol (LCOMeOH) of ATR+SOEC case is 34 % higher than the BTL reference case, while that of ATR+GHR case is 24 % lower than the BTL reference case. A lifecycle analysis (LCA) is conducted for these designs. Utilizing renewable electricity and 50 % biogenic carbon, the ATR+SOEC case emits 908 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH for a 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP), while the ATR+GHR case emits 721 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH. For a 20-year GWP, these emissions are 1055 and 915 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH, respectively. These emissions correspond to more than 50 % reduction in LCA emissions when compared to natural gas based LCA emissions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782324000056/pdfft?md5=a66e9e4ebf5394b1fbf1420dce8c099a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772782324000056-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782324000056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782324000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flexible and synergistic methanol production via biomass gasification and natural gas reforming
Sustainable liquid fuels are essential for decarbonization of various means of transportation which are challenging to address through electrification or hydrogen use. A possible method for producing low-carbon liquid fuel is through the thermochemical biomass to liquid (BTL) process. In this study, we conduct a technoeconomic-environmental analysis of two processes which take advantage of integration of natural gas reforming and biomass gasification, with the objective of improving the economics. By integrating H2-rich syngas (a mixture of H2/CO) obtained from natural gas reforming with carbon-rich syngas from biomass gasification, we harness synergistic effects. This combination allows us to achieve the optimal H2/CO ratio required for methanol synthesis, while also ensuring efficient carbon utilization. In the first design, natural gas is reformed in an autothermal reformer (ATR) to produce syngas. A Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) is utilized to supply the O2 for both gasification and reforming processes. The H2 produced by the SOEC adjusts the H2 content in the syngas before the methanol synthesis reactor. In the second design, natural gas is reformed in a gas-heated-reformer (GHR) before an ATR, while an Air Separation Unit (ASU) produces the O2 for the process. As a benchmark, the economics and flexible operation of both processes are compared to a conventional BTL process. In addition, the techno-economic impact of operating in biomass-only or natural gas-only modes are investigated. For a 134 MWth plant with 50 % of entering carbon from biomass, the levelized cost of methanol (LCOMeOH) of ATR+SOEC case is 34 % higher than the BTL reference case, while that of ATR+GHR case is 24 % lower than the BTL reference case. A lifecycle analysis (LCA) is conducted for these designs. Utilizing renewable electricity and 50 % biogenic carbon, the ATR+SOEC case emits 908 kgCO2e /tonne MeOH for a 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP), while the ATR+GHR case emits 721 kgCO2e /tonne MeOH. For a 20-year GWP, these emissions are 1055 and 915 kgCO2e /tonne MeOH, respectively. These emissions correspond to more than 50 % reduction in LCA emissions when compared to natural gas based LCA emissions.