Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman , Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde , Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez , Yendry Ventura-Carmenate , Shinnette Lumame , Charisma Castelo , Nameer Abdul Al-Saadawi , Mohamed Ibrahim Abu-Haleeqa , Inas El-Najjar , Fatema Mohammed Al-Kaabi
{"title":"作为造血干细胞分离质量指标的细胞吞吐量和性能比:单中心经验","authors":"Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman , Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde , Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez , Yendry Ventura-Carmenate , Shinnette Lumame , Charisma Castelo , Nameer Abdul Al-Saadawi , Mohamed Ibrahim Abu-Haleeqa , Inas El-Najjar , Fatema Mohammed Al-Kaabi","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2024.104003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Benchmarking in CD34<sup>+</sup> cell apheresis is crucial for optimizing resources, ensuring consistent collection performance, and ultimately, decision-making algorithms to improve donor safety. Key performance indicators such as the “performance ratio” (PR) are applied routinely in some apheresis centers, whereas this report identifies the “cell throughput” (CT) as another quality indicator in apheresis.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This single-center study includes retrospective data from 117 aphereses. CT and PR were calculated based on the mononuclear cell collection (MNC) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocols of the Spectra Optia® apheresis system, types of venous access, transplant settings, and</p><p>mobilization regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CTs (× 10<sup>6</sup> CD34<sup>+</sup> cells/min) were found to be greater in cMNC compared to MNC protocols (1.4 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0037), in allogeneic versus autologous (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.0274), and in the mobilization regimen of G-CSF alone versus the G-CSF combined (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0249). In contrast, PR (%) was only statistically significant in favor of the cMNC protocol (213.0 vs. 186.8 for MNC).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CT and PR are feasible quality indicators on CD34<sup>+</sup> cell apheresis, are easy to calculate and implement, and have clinical and administrative implications. Analyzing CT and PR may strengthen the institutional criteria for selecting cMNC or MNC protocols; they may also be used to evaluate the performance of new personnel or cell separator devices or, eventually, trigger investigations for those aphereses under-collected by specific thresholds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"63 6","pages":"Article 104003"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cell throughput and performance ratio as quality indicators on hematopoietic stem cell apheresis: A single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman , Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde , Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez , Yendry Ventura-Carmenate , Shinnette Lumame , Charisma Castelo , Nameer Abdul Al-Saadawi , Mohamed Ibrahim Abu-Haleeqa , Inas El-Najjar , Fatema Mohammed Al-Kaabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transci.2024.104003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Benchmarking in CD34<sup>+</sup> cell apheresis is crucial for optimizing resources, ensuring consistent collection performance, and ultimately, decision-making algorithms to improve donor safety. Key performance indicators such as the “performance ratio” (PR) are applied routinely in some apheresis centers, whereas this report identifies the “cell throughput” (CT) as another quality indicator in apheresis.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This single-center study includes retrospective data from 117 aphereses. CT and PR were calculated based on the mononuclear cell collection (MNC) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocols of the Spectra Optia® apheresis system, types of venous access, transplant settings, and</p><p>mobilization regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CTs (× 10<sup>6</sup> CD34<sup>+</sup> cells/min) were found to be greater in cMNC compared to MNC protocols (1.4 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0037), in allogeneic versus autologous (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.0274), and in the mobilization regimen of G-CSF alone versus the G-CSF combined (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0249). In contrast, PR (%) was only statistically significant in favor of the cMNC protocol (213.0 vs. 186.8 for MNC).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CT and PR are feasible quality indicators on CD34<sup>+</sup> cell apheresis, are easy to calculate and implement, and have clinical and administrative implications. Analyzing CT and PR may strengthen the institutional criteria for selecting cMNC or MNC protocols; they may also be used to evaluate the performance of new personnel or cell separator devices or, eventually, trigger investigations for those aphereses under-collected by specific thresholds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion and Apheresis Science\",\"volume\":\"63 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 104003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion and Apheresis Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224001745\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224001745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cell throughput and performance ratio as quality indicators on hematopoietic stem cell apheresis: A single-center experience
Background
Benchmarking in CD34+ cell apheresis is crucial for optimizing resources, ensuring consistent collection performance, and ultimately, decision-making algorithms to improve donor safety. Key performance indicators such as the “performance ratio” (PR) are applied routinely in some apheresis centers, whereas this report identifies the “cell throughput” (CT) as another quality indicator in apheresis.
Material and methods
This single-center study includes retrospective data from 117 aphereses. CT and PR were calculated based on the mononuclear cell collection (MNC) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocols of the Spectra Optia® apheresis system, types of venous access, transplant settings, and
mobilization regimens.
Results
CTs (× 106 CD34+ cells/min) were found to be greater in cMNC compared to MNC protocols (1.4 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0037), in allogeneic versus autologous (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.0274), and in the mobilization regimen of G-CSF alone versus the G-CSF combined (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0249). In contrast, PR (%) was only statistically significant in favor of the cMNC protocol (213.0 vs. 186.8 for MNC).
Conclusions
CT and PR are feasible quality indicators on CD34+ cell apheresis, are easy to calculate and implement, and have clinical and administrative implications. Analyzing CT and PR may strengthen the institutional criteria for selecting cMNC or MNC protocols; they may also be used to evaluate the performance of new personnel or cell separator devices or, eventually, trigger investigations for those aphereses under-collected by specific thresholds.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues.
Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.