洋甘菊对预防和/或治疗口腔黏膜炎的功效:综述

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
A.M.I. Barros , J. da Silva Vieira , P.H. Sette-de-Souza , A.P.V. Sobral , M.M.F. da Silveira
{"title":"洋甘菊对预防和/或治疗口腔黏膜炎的功效:综述","authors":"A.M.I. Barros ,&nbsp;J. da Silva Vieira ,&nbsp;P.H. Sette-de-Souza ,&nbsp;A.P.V. Sobral ,&nbsp;M.M.F. da Silveira","doi":"10.1016/j.hermed.2024.100927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study provides an overview of the systematic reviews on the efficacy of <em>Matricaria recutita</em> in the prevention and/or treatment of oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing oncological treatments in the head and neck region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Searches were conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards and registered in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021272283). The quality of the studies was analysed through the evaluation of Glenny scale and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR 2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Initially, 3,416 studies were evaluated for relevance, leading to the inclusion of 12 systematic reviews that specifically addressed the efficacy of M. recutita for the prevention and treatment of OM in oncological settings. Quantitatively, 75% of the systematic reviews were rated as high quality based on the Glenny Scale, indicating robust methodological design. However, a contrasting perspective from the AMSTAR 2 assessment highlighted that only one of these reviews (8.33%) met the criteria for high methodological quality. This discrepancy suggests significant variability in the quality assurance measures applied across the studies. The effectiveness of <em>M recutita</em> from potentially beneficial to inconclusive, with the majority suggesting that while the herb shows promise as a treatment option, the existing evidence is not sufficiently robust and is marked by considerable conflict due to methodological limitations and variability in study outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion/Conclusions</h3><p>The research underscores the need for additional randomized clinical trials to confirm the potential benefits of <em>M. recutita</em> in managing OM in managing OM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herbal Medicine","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100927"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Matricaria recutita (Chamomile) in the Prevention and/or Treatment of Oral Mucositis: Umbrella Review\",\"authors\":\"A.M.I. Barros ,&nbsp;J. da Silva Vieira ,&nbsp;P.H. Sette-de-Souza ,&nbsp;A.P.V. Sobral ,&nbsp;M.M.F. da Silveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hermed.2024.100927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study provides an overview of the systematic reviews on the efficacy of <em>Matricaria recutita</em> in the prevention and/or treatment of oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing oncological treatments in the head and neck region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Searches were conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards and registered in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021272283). The quality of the studies was analysed through the evaluation of Glenny scale and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR 2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Initially, 3,416 studies were evaluated for relevance, leading to the inclusion of 12 systematic reviews that specifically addressed the efficacy of M. recutita for the prevention and treatment of OM in oncological settings. Quantitatively, 75% of the systematic reviews were rated as high quality based on the Glenny Scale, indicating robust methodological design. However, a contrasting perspective from the AMSTAR 2 assessment highlighted that only one of these reviews (8.33%) met the criteria for high methodological quality. This discrepancy suggests significant variability in the quality assurance measures applied across the studies. The effectiveness of <em>M recutita</em> from potentially beneficial to inconclusive, with the majority suggesting that while the herb shows promise as a treatment option, the existing evidence is not sufficiently robust and is marked by considerable conflict due to methodological limitations and variability in study outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion/Conclusions</h3><p>The research underscores the need for additional randomized clinical trials to confirm the potential benefits of <em>M. recutita</em> in managing OM in managing OM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Herbal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Herbal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210803324000848\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herbal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210803324000848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言本研究概述了有关母菊预防和/或治疗头颈部肿瘤患者口腔黏膜炎(OM)疗效的系统性综述。方法在多个数据库(包括PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science)中进行搜索,遵循系统性综述和Meta分析首选报告项目标准,并在系统性综述前瞻性注册中心(CRD42021272283)注册。研究质量通过格兰尼量表评估和多篇系统综述评估-2(AMSTAR 2)进行分析。结果最初评估了 3416 项研究的相关性,最终纳入了 12 篇系统综述,这些综述专门讨论了 M. recutita 在肿瘤环境中预防和治疗 OM 的疗效。从数量上看,75% 的系统综述根据格兰尼量表被评为高质量,表明其方法设计稳健。然而,AMSTAR 2 评估结果却显示,这些综述中只有一篇(8.33%)符合高质量方法学标准。这种差异表明,各项研究采用的质量保证措施存在很大差异。M. recutita的疗效从可能有益到尚无定论,大多数研究表明,虽然这种草药有望成为一种治疗选择,但现有证据不够有力,而且由于方法上的局限性和研究结果的多变性,证据之间存在相当大的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of Matricaria recutita (Chamomile) in the Prevention and/or Treatment of Oral Mucositis: Umbrella Review

Efficacy of Matricaria recutita (Chamomile) in the Prevention and/or Treatment of Oral Mucositis: Umbrella Review

Introduction

This study provides an overview of the systematic reviews on the efficacy of Matricaria recutita in the prevention and/or treatment of oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing oncological treatments in the head and neck region.

Methods

Searches were conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards and registered in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021272283). The quality of the studies was analysed through the evaluation of Glenny scale and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR 2).

Results

Initially, 3,416 studies were evaluated for relevance, leading to the inclusion of 12 systematic reviews that specifically addressed the efficacy of M. recutita for the prevention and treatment of OM in oncological settings. Quantitatively, 75% of the systematic reviews were rated as high quality based on the Glenny Scale, indicating robust methodological design. However, a contrasting perspective from the AMSTAR 2 assessment highlighted that only one of these reviews (8.33%) met the criteria for high methodological quality. This discrepancy suggests significant variability in the quality assurance measures applied across the studies. The effectiveness of M recutita from potentially beneficial to inconclusive, with the majority suggesting that while the herb shows promise as a treatment option, the existing evidence is not sufficiently robust and is marked by considerable conflict due to methodological limitations and variability in study outcomes.

Discussion/Conclusions

The research underscores the need for additional randomized clinical trials to confirm the potential benefits of M. recutita in managing OM in managing OM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Herbal Medicine
Journal of Herbal Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Herbal Medicine, the official journal of the National Institute of Medical Herbalists, is a peer reviewed journal which aims to serve its readers as an authoritative resource on the profession and practice of herbal medicine. The content areas of the journal reflect the interests of Medical Herbalists and other health professionals interested in the clinical and professional application of botanical medicines. The objective is to strengthen the research and educational base of herbal medicine with research papers in the form of case studies, original research articles and reviews, monographs, clinical trials and relevant in vitro studies. It also publishes policy statements, opinion pieces, book reviews, conference proceedings and profession related information such as pharmacovigilance reports providing an information source for not only the Herbal Practitioner but any Health professional with an interest in phytotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信