利用大型磁共振成像数据集量化眼眶形态的性别差异

Q3 Medicine
Yingxiang Han , Qi Li , Tingting Liu , Zengsheng Chen , Xi Chen , Xiaofei Wang
{"title":"利用大型磁共振成像数据集量化眼眶形态的性别差异","authors":"Yingxiang Han ,&nbsp;Qi Li ,&nbsp;Tingting Liu ,&nbsp;Zengsheng Chen ,&nbsp;Xi Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.medntd.2024.100332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate gender differences in orbital morphology using large MRI datasets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a deep learning-based approach, the orbit and eyeball were automatically segmented from high resolution 3D MRI images of the IXI and OASIS3 datasets. Orbital and eyeball morphological parameters, including orbital volume, eyeball volume, effective orbital volume (EOV, defined as the orbital cavity volume excluding the eyeball), and coronal orbital dimensions and shape, were quantitatively assessed. The volume index was defined as the ratio of orbital volume to eyeball volume.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 1926 subjects with a mean age of 63.9 ​± ​15.3 years. The mean volumes of the eyeball and orbit were 7.1 ​± ​1.0 ​ml and 25.9 ​± ​3.5 ​ml, respectively. Significant gender differences (all P ​&lt; ​0.001) were observed in the following parameters (males versus females): orbital volume (28.3 ​± ​3.0 ​ml versus 24.0 ​± ​2.7 ​ml), EOV (25.1 ​± ​3.0 ​ml versus 21.1 ​± ​2.6 ​ml), eyeball volume (7.3 ​± ​1.0 ​ml versus 6.9 ​± ​1.0 ​ml), volume index (3.9 ​± ​0.6 versus 3.5 ​± ​0.5), orbital depth (40.0 ​± ​3.1 ​mm versus 37.4 ​± ​2.9 ​mm), coronal orbital height (40.8 ​± ​3.0 ​mm versus 38.4 ​± ​2.4 ​mm), coronal orbital width (38.0 ​± ​1.9 ​mm versus 36.6 ​± ​1.7 ​mm) and coronal orbital area (1292.5 ​± ​97.1 ​mm<sup>2</sup> versus 1177.9 ​± ​89.7 ​mm<sup>2</sup>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study employed deep learning to analyze a large dataset of 3D head MRI scans, achieving accurate and objective measurements of orbital morphology. We identified significant gender differences in orbital parameters, with males generally having larger structures. Additionally, we established a normative database for orbital dimensions, providing a valuable resource for future research on orbital disorders and potentially improving clinical diagnosis and treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33783,"journal":{"name":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093524000481/pdfft?md5=d7d4ebfcca38920363bf2ba466b1a9af&pid=1-s2.0-S2590093524000481-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying gender differences in orbital morphology with large MRI datasets\",\"authors\":\"Yingxiang Han ,&nbsp;Qi Li ,&nbsp;Tingting Liu ,&nbsp;Zengsheng Chen ,&nbsp;Xi Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medntd.2024.100332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate gender differences in orbital morphology using large MRI datasets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a deep learning-based approach, the orbit and eyeball were automatically segmented from high resolution 3D MRI images of the IXI and OASIS3 datasets. Orbital and eyeball morphological parameters, including orbital volume, eyeball volume, effective orbital volume (EOV, defined as the orbital cavity volume excluding the eyeball), and coronal orbital dimensions and shape, were quantitatively assessed. The volume index was defined as the ratio of orbital volume to eyeball volume.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 1926 subjects with a mean age of 63.9 ​± ​15.3 years. The mean volumes of the eyeball and orbit were 7.1 ​± ​1.0 ​ml and 25.9 ​± ​3.5 ​ml, respectively. Significant gender differences (all P ​&lt; ​0.001) were observed in the following parameters (males versus females): orbital volume (28.3 ​± ​3.0 ​ml versus 24.0 ​± ​2.7 ​ml), EOV (25.1 ​± ​3.0 ​ml versus 21.1 ​± ​2.6 ​ml), eyeball volume (7.3 ​± ​1.0 ​ml versus 6.9 ​± ​1.0 ​ml), volume index (3.9 ​± ​0.6 versus 3.5 ​± ​0.5), orbital depth (40.0 ​± ​3.1 ​mm versus 37.4 ​± ​2.9 ​mm), coronal orbital height (40.8 ​± ​3.0 ​mm versus 38.4 ​± ​2.4 ​mm), coronal orbital width (38.0 ​± ​1.9 ​mm versus 36.6 ​± ​1.7 ​mm) and coronal orbital area (1292.5 ​± ​97.1 ​mm<sup>2</sup> versus 1177.9 ​± ​89.7 ​mm<sup>2</sup>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study employed deep learning to analyze a large dataset of 3D head MRI scans, achieving accurate and objective measurements of orbital morphology. We identified significant gender differences in orbital parameters, with males generally having larger structures. Additionally, we established a normative database for orbital dimensions, providing a valuable resource for future research on orbital disorders and potentially improving clinical diagnosis and treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093524000481/pdfft?md5=d7d4ebfcca38920363bf2ba466b1a9af&pid=1-s2.0-S2590093524000481-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093524000481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093524000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法利用基于深度学习的方法,从 IXI 和 OASIS3 数据集的高分辨率三维 MRI 图像中自动分割眼眶和眼球。定量评估了眼眶和眼球形态参数,包括眼眶容积、眼球容积、有效眼眶容积(EOV,定义为除去眼球的眼眶腔容积)以及冠状眶的尺寸和形状。体积指数定义为眼眶体积与眼球体积之比。眼球和眼眶的平均体积分别为 7.1 ± 1.0 毫升和 25.9 ± 3.5 毫升。在以下参数(男性与女性)中观察到显著的性别差异(均为 P < 0.001):眼眶体积(28.3 ± 3.0 ml 对 24.0 ± 2.7 ml)、EOV(25.1 ± 3.0 毫升对 21.1 ± 2.6 毫升)、眼球体积(7.3 ± 1.0 毫升对 6.9 ± 1.0 毫升)、容积指数(3.9 ± 0.6 对 3.5 ± 0.5)、眼眶深度(40.0 ± 3.1 毫米对 37.4 ± 2.9 毫米)、冠状眶高度(40.8 ± 3.0 毫米对 38.4 ± 2.4 毫米)、冠状眶宽度(38.0 ± 1.9 毫米对 36.6 ± 1.7 毫米)和冠状眶面积(1292.结论本研究利用深度学习分析了大量的三维头部 MRI 扫描数据集,实现了对眼眶形态的准确客观测量。我们发现了眼眶参数的明显性别差异,男性的眼眶结构一般较大。此外,我们还建立了眼眶尺寸的标准数据库,为今后眼眶疾病的研究提供了宝贵的资源,并有可能改善临床诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying gender differences in orbital morphology with large MRI datasets

Purpose

To investigate gender differences in orbital morphology using large MRI datasets.

Methods

Using a deep learning-based approach, the orbit and eyeball were automatically segmented from high resolution 3D MRI images of the IXI and OASIS3 datasets. Orbital and eyeball morphological parameters, including orbital volume, eyeball volume, effective orbital volume (EOV, defined as the orbital cavity volume excluding the eyeball), and coronal orbital dimensions and shape, were quantitatively assessed. The volume index was defined as the ratio of orbital volume to eyeball volume.

Results

This study included 1926 subjects with a mean age of 63.9 ​± ​15.3 years. The mean volumes of the eyeball and orbit were 7.1 ​± ​1.0 ​ml and 25.9 ​± ​3.5 ​ml, respectively. Significant gender differences (all P ​< ​0.001) were observed in the following parameters (males versus females): orbital volume (28.3 ​± ​3.0 ​ml versus 24.0 ​± ​2.7 ​ml), EOV (25.1 ​± ​3.0 ​ml versus 21.1 ​± ​2.6 ​ml), eyeball volume (7.3 ​± ​1.0 ​ml versus 6.9 ​± ​1.0 ​ml), volume index (3.9 ​± ​0.6 versus 3.5 ​± ​0.5), orbital depth (40.0 ​± ​3.1 ​mm versus 37.4 ​± ​2.9 ​mm), coronal orbital height (40.8 ​± ​3.0 ​mm versus 38.4 ​± ​2.4 ​mm), coronal orbital width (38.0 ​± ​1.9 ​mm versus 36.6 ​± ​1.7 ​mm) and coronal orbital area (1292.5 ​± ​97.1 ​mm2 versus 1177.9 ​± ​89.7 ​mm2).

Conclusions

This study employed deep learning to analyze a large dataset of 3D head MRI scans, achieving accurate and objective measurements of orbital morphology. We identified significant gender differences in orbital parameters, with males generally having larger structures. Additionally, we established a normative database for orbital dimensions, providing a valuable resource for future research on orbital disorders and potentially improving clinical diagnosis and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信