让野生蜜蜂回归种群生态学

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.4973
Nicholas N. Dorian, Max W. McCarthy, Elizabeth E. Crone
{"title":"让野生蜜蜂回归种群生态学","authors":"Nicholas N. Dorian,&nbsp;Max W. McCarthy,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Crone","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.4973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, motivated by widespread declines in wild bees, ecologists have prioritized learning about patterns of wild bee communities across the landscape at the expense of learning about the population-level mechanisms driving those patterns. In this essay, we seek to revitalize the tradition of studying wild bee populations in a way that both contributes key knowledge for bee conservation and builds a strong conceptual understanding of the processes underpinning bee populations. We address two widespread concerns about investing in population-level research. First, that population-level studies are too conceptually narrow to provide broad inference. If population-level studies are couched in general ecological theory, then findings from a single species can be generalized to many. We highlight how wild bees would make excellent candidates for exploring five areas of general ideas in population ecology, including nutritional ecology, drivers of vital rates, phenology and voltinism, habitat selection, and movement. Second, we address the concern that methods for studying bees at the population level are too difficult to implement. Methods for conducting population-level studies of bees—specifically, identifying living bees in the field and studying individuals throughout their life cycles—are feasible to implement at the scales appropriate for answering population-level questions, for example, a few species at a few sites. To facilitate adoption of these ideas, we developed an online field guide (www.watchingbees.com) and a detailed methods manual. More generally, we emphasize the value of linking data-rich pattern-oriented approaches in ecology with an understanding of the basic biology and mechanisms that generate those patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4973","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing population ecology back to wild bees\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas N. Dorian,&nbsp;Max W. McCarthy,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Crone\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.4973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, motivated by widespread declines in wild bees, ecologists have prioritized learning about patterns of wild bee communities across the landscape at the expense of learning about the population-level mechanisms driving those patterns. In this essay, we seek to revitalize the tradition of studying wild bee populations in a way that both contributes key knowledge for bee conservation and builds a strong conceptual understanding of the processes underpinning bee populations. We address two widespread concerns about investing in population-level research. First, that population-level studies are too conceptually narrow to provide broad inference. If population-level studies are couched in general ecological theory, then findings from a single species can be generalized to many. We highlight how wild bees would make excellent candidates for exploring five areas of general ideas in population ecology, including nutritional ecology, drivers of vital rates, phenology and voltinism, habitat selection, and movement. Second, we address the concern that methods for studying bees at the population level are too difficult to implement. Methods for conducting population-level studies of bees—specifically, identifying living bees in the field and studying individuals throughout their life cycles—are feasible to implement at the scales appropriate for answering population-level questions, for example, a few species at a few sites. To facilitate adoption of these ideas, we developed an online field guide (www.watchingbees.com) and a detailed methods manual. More generally, we emphasize the value of linking data-rich pattern-oriented approaches in ecology with an understanding of the basic biology and mechanisms that generate those patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4973\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4973\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,受野生蜜蜂数量普遍减少的影响,生态学家将了解整个景观中野生蜜蜂群落的模式作为优先事项,而忽视了对驱动这些模式的种群水平机制的了解。在这篇文章中,我们试图重振研究野生蜜蜂种群的传统,使其既能为蜜蜂保护贡献关键知识,又能对蜜蜂种群的基本过程建立起强有力的概念性理解。对于投资种群研究,我们提出了两个普遍关注的问题。首先,种群水平研究的概念过于狭窄,无法提供广泛的推论。如果将种群水平的研究纳入一般生态理论,那么单一物种的研究结果就可以推广到许多物种。我们强调了野生蜜蜂是如何成为探索种群生态学中五个一般观点领域的最佳候选者,包括营养生态学、生命速率的驱动因素、物候学和伏立、栖息地选择和运动。其次,我们解决了在种群水平上研究蜜蜂的方法太难实施的问题。对蜜蜂进行种群水平研究的方法--具体来说,就是在野外识别活体蜜蜂并对个体的整个生命周期进行研究--在回答种群水平问题的适当尺度上是可行的,例如在几个地点对几个物种进行研究。为了便于采纳这些想法,我们开发了在线野外指南(www.watchingbees.com)和详细的方法手册。更广泛地说,我们强调将生态学中数据丰富、以模式为导向的方法与对产生这些模式的基础生物学和机制的理解联系起来的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bringing population ecology back to wild bees

Bringing population ecology back to wild bees

In recent years, motivated by widespread declines in wild bees, ecologists have prioritized learning about patterns of wild bee communities across the landscape at the expense of learning about the population-level mechanisms driving those patterns. In this essay, we seek to revitalize the tradition of studying wild bee populations in a way that both contributes key knowledge for bee conservation and builds a strong conceptual understanding of the processes underpinning bee populations. We address two widespread concerns about investing in population-level research. First, that population-level studies are too conceptually narrow to provide broad inference. If population-level studies are couched in general ecological theory, then findings from a single species can be generalized to many. We highlight how wild bees would make excellent candidates for exploring five areas of general ideas in population ecology, including nutritional ecology, drivers of vital rates, phenology and voltinism, habitat selection, and movement. Second, we address the concern that methods for studying bees at the population level are too difficult to implement. Methods for conducting population-level studies of bees—specifically, identifying living bees in the field and studying individuals throughout their life cycles—are feasible to implement at the scales appropriate for answering population-level questions, for example, a few species at a few sites. To facilitate adoption of these ideas, we developed an online field guide (www.watchingbees.com) and a detailed methods manual. More generally, we emphasize the value of linking data-rich pattern-oriented approaches in ecology with an understanding of the basic biology and mechanisms that generate those patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信