Laura Fröhlich PhD, Stefan K. Plontke MD, Lea B. Löffler, Antonia Manthey, Torsten Rahne PhD
{"title":"导致人工耳蜗使用者前庭电共振的刺激条件","authors":"Laura Fröhlich PhD, Stefan K. Plontke MD, Lea B. Löffler, Antonia Manthey, Torsten Rahne PhD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The study objective was to investigate the influence of electrical stimulus properties on cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to electrical stimulation by cochlear implants (e-cVEMPs, e-oVEMPs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>E-VEMPs were recorded in adult Nucleus cochlear implant (CI) patients using electric pulse trains (4 biphasic pulses at 1000 Hz burst rate). Ground path and stimulation electrodes were varied between monopolar stimulation at basal electrode contact E3 (MP1 + 2 E3), monopolar stimulation at apical electrode contact E20 (MP1 + 2 E20), and bipolar transmodiolar stimulation between E3 and E14 (BP E3-E14). The electric pulse train was further varied to 2 pulses at 1000 Hz, 2 pulses at 500 Hz, and a single pulse, in patients with present e-VEMP responses. VEMPs to bone-conducted vibration (BCV) were recorded as reference in all participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Measurements were conducted in 30 ears of 27 participants (mean age 49.3 years, SD 12.7 years). E-VEMPs were present in 13 ears (43%). 5 of the 13 cases showed e-VEMPs but no BCV evoked VEMPs. Response numbers increased with increasing stimulation levels. The highest response rate of 40% was obtained for MP1 + 2 E3 stimulation. Stimulus variation did not affect response numbers. E-VEMP amplitudes were comparable to BCV-stimulated VEMPs. Latencies were up to 3.1 ms shorter for electric stimulation. Some patients showed e-VEMP thresholds close to or below the electric hearing threshold level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The occurrence of e-VEMPs is dependent on current path and stimulation level. Vestibular co-stimulation by the CI is more likely in patients with high stimulation levels and for monopolar stimulation of basal electrode contacts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>4.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulation conditions leading to electrical vestibular co-stimulation in cochlear implant users\",\"authors\":\"Laura Fröhlich PhD, Stefan K. Plontke MD, Lea B. Löffler, Antonia Manthey, Torsten Rahne PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study objective was to investigate the influence of electrical stimulus properties on cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to electrical stimulation by cochlear implants (e-cVEMPs, e-oVEMPs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>E-VEMPs were recorded in adult Nucleus cochlear implant (CI) patients using electric pulse trains (4 biphasic pulses at 1000 Hz burst rate). Ground path and stimulation electrodes were varied between monopolar stimulation at basal electrode contact E3 (MP1 + 2 E3), monopolar stimulation at apical electrode contact E20 (MP1 + 2 E20), and bipolar transmodiolar stimulation between E3 and E14 (BP E3-E14). The electric pulse train was further varied to 2 pulses at 1000 Hz, 2 pulses at 500 Hz, and a single pulse, in patients with present e-VEMP responses. VEMPs to bone-conducted vibration (BCV) were recorded as reference in all participants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Measurements were conducted in 30 ears of 27 participants (mean age 49.3 years, SD 12.7 years). E-VEMPs were present in 13 ears (43%). 5 of the 13 cases showed e-VEMPs but no BCV evoked VEMPs. Response numbers increased with increasing stimulation levels. The highest response rate of 40% was obtained for MP1 + 2 E3 stimulation. Stimulus variation did not affect response numbers. E-VEMP amplitudes were comparable to BCV-stimulated VEMPs. Latencies were up to 3.1 ms shorter for electric stimulation. Some patients showed e-VEMP thresholds close to or below the electric hearing threshold level.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The occurrence of e-VEMPs is dependent on current path and stimulation level. Vestibular co-stimulation by the CI is more likely in patients with high stimulation levels and for monopolar stimulation of basal electrode contacts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>4.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stimulation conditions leading to electrical vestibular co-stimulation in cochlear implant users
Objectives
The study objective was to investigate the influence of electrical stimulus properties on cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to electrical stimulation by cochlear implants (e-cVEMPs, e-oVEMPs).
Methods
E-VEMPs were recorded in adult Nucleus cochlear implant (CI) patients using electric pulse trains (4 biphasic pulses at 1000 Hz burst rate). Ground path and stimulation electrodes were varied between monopolar stimulation at basal electrode contact E3 (MP1 + 2 E3), monopolar stimulation at apical electrode contact E20 (MP1 + 2 E20), and bipolar transmodiolar stimulation between E3 and E14 (BP E3-E14). The electric pulse train was further varied to 2 pulses at 1000 Hz, 2 pulses at 500 Hz, and a single pulse, in patients with present e-VEMP responses. VEMPs to bone-conducted vibration (BCV) were recorded as reference in all participants.
Results
Measurements were conducted in 30 ears of 27 participants (mean age 49.3 years, SD 12.7 years). E-VEMPs were present in 13 ears (43%). 5 of the 13 cases showed e-VEMPs but no BCV evoked VEMPs. Response numbers increased with increasing stimulation levels. The highest response rate of 40% was obtained for MP1 + 2 E3 stimulation. Stimulus variation did not affect response numbers. E-VEMP amplitudes were comparable to BCV-stimulated VEMPs. Latencies were up to 3.1 ms shorter for electric stimulation. Some patients showed e-VEMP thresholds close to or below the electric hearing threshold level.
Conclusion
The occurrence of e-VEMPs is dependent on current path and stimulation level. Vestibular co-stimulation by the CI is more likely in patients with high stimulation levels and for monopolar stimulation of basal electrode contacts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
