通过土壤有益菌、植物幼苗和质粒挑刺试验揭示丙溴磷的生态危害:短期毒性调查

IF 6.8 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Mohammad Shahid, Udai B. Singh
{"title":"通过土壤有益菌、植物幼苗和质粒挑刺试验揭示丙溴磷的生态危害:短期毒性调查","authors":"Mohammad Shahid,&nbsp;Udai B. Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.stress.2024.100577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Excessive and indiscriminate use of pesticides may adversely affect the growth and activity of both crop plants and soil microbial populations. The reported study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity of profenofos (PF; an organophosphate insecticide) using bacterial (<em>Pseudomonas fluorescens</em> PSB-3 and <em>Enterobacter cloacae</em> ZSB-8) and plant (<em>Coriandrum sativum</em> and <em>Lactuca sativa</em> L.) bioassays. PF was applied at rates of (0–100 µg mL<sup>−1</sup>) <em>in vitro</em>. Both bacterial strains were sensitive to PF but showed variable tolerance. Following PF exposure, cellular growth, morphology, survival, and inner membrane permeability of bacterial strains were significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) altered. Decreased population size coincided with decline in cellular respiration. The 100 µgmL<sup>−1</sup> PF dosage imparted maximum impact on ZSB-8, inhibiting populations by 87%. PF also interfered with bacterial surface adherence (<em>i.e.</em>, biofilm formation) in a concentration-dependent manner. Alterations in bacterial biomarker enzymatic activity and oxidative stress were also noted. PGP traits of bacterial strains were negatively and significantly (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) affected by insecticide. Under PF stress, reduction in indole-3-acetic and siderophore production followed the order: ZSB-8 &gt; PSB-3. PF-induced phytotoxicity was confirmed via reduction in germination, seedling parameters, survival, tolerance, and vigor indices in both plant species. Additionally, PF caused distortion in morphology of root tips and root surfaces. Under CLSM, PF-exposed C. sativum and L. sativa roots exhibited increased oxidative stress. Cellular death in insecticide-treated roots was observed following staining with Evans blue dye. Insecticide concentration-dependent increase in stress markers (proline and MDA content), and antioxidant enzymatic activities in plant seedlings were observed. A dose-dependent conversion of super-coiled form of DNA to open circular in pBR-322 plasmid revealed the genotoxic potential of PF. These findings provide an understanding of toxic effects of profenofos on beneficial microbes and leafy edible vegetables, including their morphological, and cellular effects. Indeed, insecticidal applications deserve special attention due to their potential environmental hazards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34736,"journal":{"name":"Plant Stress","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100577"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X24002306/pdfft?md5=69ff474af04c5edd5c23b19d32c147d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667064X24002306-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ecological hazards of profenofos revealed by soil beneficial-bacteria, plant seedlings, and plasmid nicking assays: A short-term toxicity investigation\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Shahid,&nbsp;Udai B. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stress.2024.100577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Excessive and indiscriminate use of pesticides may adversely affect the growth and activity of both crop plants and soil microbial populations. The reported study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity of profenofos (PF; an organophosphate insecticide) using bacterial (<em>Pseudomonas fluorescens</em> PSB-3 and <em>Enterobacter cloacae</em> ZSB-8) and plant (<em>Coriandrum sativum</em> and <em>Lactuca sativa</em> L.) bioassays. PF was applied at rates of (0–100 µg mL<sup>−1</sup>) <em>in vitro</em>. Both bacterial strains were sensitive to PF but showed variable tolerance. Following PF exposure, cellular growth, morphology, survival, and inner membrane permeability of bacterial strains were significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) altered. Decreased population size coincided with decline in cellular respiration. The 100 µgmL<sup>−1</sup> PF dosage imparted maximum impact on ZSB-8, inhibiting populations by 87%. PF also interfered with bacterial surface adherence (<em>i.e.</em>, biofilm formation) in a concentration-dependent manner. Alterations in bacterial biomarker enzymatic activity and oxidative stress were also noted. PGP traits of bacterial strains were negatively and significantly (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) affected by insecticide. Under PF stress, reduction in indole-3-acetic and siderophore production followed the order: ZSB-8 &gt; PSB-3. PF-induced phytotoxicity was confirmed via reduction in germination, seedling parameters, survival, tolerance, and vigor indices in both plant species. Additionally, PF caused distortion in morphology of root tips and root surfaces. Under CLSM, PF-exposed C. sativum and L. sativa roots exhibited increased oxidative stress. Cellular death in insecticide-treated roots was observed following staining with Evans blue dye. Insecticide concentration-dependent increase in stress markers (proline and MDA content), and antioxidant enzymatic activities in plant seedlings were observed. A dose-dependent conversion of super-coiled form of DNA to open circular in pBR-322 plasmid revealed the genotoxic potential of PF. These findings provide an understanding of toxic effects of profenofos on beneficial microbes and leafy edible vegetables, including their morphological, and cellular effects. Indeed, insecticidal applications deserve special attention due to their potential environmental hazards.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Stress\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X24002306/pdfft?md5=69ff474af04c5edd5c23b19d32c147d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667064X24002306-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X24002306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X24002306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过度和滥用杀虫剂可能会对作物和土壤微生物种群的生长和活性产生不利影响。报告中的研究采用细菌(荧光假单胞菌 PSB-3 和肠杆菌 ZSB-8)和植物(芫荽和莴苣)生物测定法评估了丙溴磷(PF,一种有机磷杀虫剂)的毒性。体外施用 PF 的比率为(0-100 µg mL-1)。两种细菌菌株对 PF 都很敏感,但耐受性各不相同。暴露于 PF 后,细菌菌株的细胞生长、形态、存活率和内膜渗透性都发生了显著变化(p < 0.05)。菌群数量的减少与细胞呼吸作用的下降同时发生。100 µgmL-1 PF 剂量对 ZSB-8 的影响最大,抑制了 87% 的菌群。PF 还以浓度依赖的方式干扰了细菌的表面粘附(即生物膜的形成)。细菌生物标志物酶活性和氧化应激也发生了变化。细菌菌株的 PGP 特性受到杀虫剂的显著负面影响(p ≤ 0.05)。在 PF 胁迫下,吲哚-3-乙酸和嗜苷酸盐的产量依次减少:ZSB-8 > PSB-3。两种植物的发芽率、幼苗参数、存活率、耐受性和活力指数的降低证实了 PF 诱导的植物毒性。此外,PF 还导致根尖和根表面形态扭曲。在 CLSM 条件下,暴露于 PF 的 C. sativum 和 L. sativa 根系表现出更强的氧化应激。用伊文思蓝染料染色后,可以观察到杀虫剂处理过的根细胞死亡。在植物幼苗中,观察到应激标记物(脯氨酸和 MDA 含量)和抗氧化酶活性的增加与杀虫剂浓度有关。在 pBR-322 质粒中,超卷曲 DNA 转变为开放环状 DNA 的剂量依赖性揭示了 PF 的潜在遗传毒性。这些发现让人们了解了丙溴磷对有益微生物和叶菜类蔬菜的毒性作用,包括其形态和细胞效应。事实上,杀虫应用因其潜在的环境危害而值得特别关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The ecological hazards of profenofos revealed by soil beneficial-bacteria, plant seedlings, and plasmid nicking assays: A short-term toxicity investigation

The ecological hazards of profenofos revealed by soil beneficial-bacteria, plant seedlings, and plasmid nicking assays: A short-term toxicity investigation

Excessive and indiscriminate use of pesticides may adversely affect the growth and activity of both crop plants and soil microbial populations. The reported study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity of profenofos (PF; an organophosphate insecticide) using bacterial (Pseudomonas fluorescens PSB-3 and Enterobacter cloacae ZSB-8) and plant (Coriandrum sativum and Lactuca sativa L.) bioassays. PF was applied at rates of (0–100 µg mL−1) in vitro. Both bacterial strains were sensitive to PF but showed variable tolerance. Following PF exposure, cellular growth, morphology, survival, and inner membrane permeability of bacterial strains were significantly (p < 0.05) altered. Decreased population size coincided with decline in cellular respiration. The 100 µgmL−1 PF dosage imparted maximum impact on ZSB-8, inhibiting populations by 87%. PF also interfered with bacterial surface adherence (i.e., biofilm formation) in a concentration-dependent manner. Alterations in bacterial biomarker enzymatic activity and oxidative stress were also noted. PGP traits of bacterial strains were negatively and significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected by insecticide. Under PF stress, reduction in indole-3-acetic and siderophore production followed the order: ZSB-8 > PSB-3. PF-induced phytotoxicity was confirmed via reduction in germination, seedling parameters, survival, tolerance, and vigor indices in both plant species. Additionally, PF caused distortion in morphology of root tips and root surfaces. Under CLSM, PF-exposed C. sativum and L. sativa roots exhibited increased oxidative stress. Cellular death in insecticide-treated roots was observed following staining with Evans blue dye. Insecticide concentration-dependent increase in stress markers (proline and MDA content), and antioxidant enzymatic activities in plant seedlings were observed. A dose-dependent conversion of super-coiled form of DNA to open circular in pBR-322 plasmid revealed the genotoxic potential of PF. These findings provide an understanding of toxic effects of profenofos on beneficial microbes and leafy edible vegetables, including their morphological, and cellular effects. Indeed, insecticidal applications deserve special attention due to their potential environmental hazards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Stress
Plant Stress PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The journal Plant Stress deals with plant (or other photoautotrophs, such as algae, cyanobacteria and lichens) responses to abiotic and biotic stress factors that can result in limited growth and productivity. Such responses can be analyzed and described at a physiological, biochemical and molecular level. Experimental approaches/technologies aiming to improve growth and productivity with a potential for downstream validation under stress conditions will also be considered. Both fundamental and applied research manuscripts are welcome, provided that clear mechanistic hypotheses are made and descriptive approaches are avoided. In addition, high-quality review articles will also be considered, provided they follow a critical approach and stimulate thought for future research avenues. Plant Stress welcomes high-quality manuscripts related (but not limited) to interactions between plants and: Lack of water (drought) and excess (flooding), Salinity stress, Elevated temperature and/or low temperature (chilling and freezing), Hypoxia and/or anoxia, Mineral nutrient excess and/or deficiency, Heavy metals and/or metalloids, Plant priming (chemical, biological, physiological, nanomaterial, biostimulant) approaches for improved stress protection, Viral, phytoplasma, bacterial and fungal plant-pathogen interactions. The journal welcomes basic and applied research articles, as well as review articles and short communications. All submitted manuscripts will be subject to a thorough peer-reviewing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信