日粮硝酸盐、富马酸和甲烷营养菌对奶牛瘤胃营养代谢和肠道气体交换的影响

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Morten Maigaard, Martin R. Weisbjerg, Mette Olaf Nielsen, Anne Louise Frydendahl Hellwing, Peter Lund
{"title":"日粮硝酸盐、富马酸和甲烷营养菌对奶牛瘤胃营养代谢和肠道气体交换的影响","authors":"Morten Maigaard,&nbsp;Martin R. Weisbjerg,&nbsp;Mette Olaf Nielsen,&nbsp;Anne Louise Frydendahl Hellwing,&nbsp;Peter Lund","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of two approaches for enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) mitigation and one approach for redirection of excess hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) resulting from CH<sub>4</sub> inhibition, on dairy cows’ gas exchange and nutrient digestibility. Approaches for CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation were methanotrophic bacteria supplementation and dietary nitrate, whereas the approach for H<sub>2</sub> redirection was nitrate combined with fumaric acid. An incomplete 6 × 6 Latin square design experiment was conducted with 4 periods of 21 d using 6 rumen, duodenum, and ileum cannulated Danish Holstein cows with DIM of 123 ± 64.8 d (mean ± SD) and the milk yield was 33.6 ± 9.39 kg/d at beginning of experiment. The treatments were organized in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement, where the first factor represented treatments without or with methanotrophic bacteria supplementation (MET), and the second factor represented 3 different dietary additive supplementations (DIET). These were a basal diet (BAS; no additives), a diet with nitrate (NIT; 10 g nitrate/kg dry matter (DM)), and a diet with nitrate combined with fumaric acid (NIT-F; NIT + 15 g fumaric acid/kg DM). Cows had ad libitum access to diets with a forage to concentrate ratio of 60 to 40 on dry matter basis. Following adaptation to experimental diets, samples of rumen fluid, digesta from duodenum and ileum, and feces were collected to estimate nutrient digestibility using Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> as external flow markers. Then, gas exchanges were measured in respiration chambers. There was no CH<sub>4</sub> mitigating effect of MET. Nitrate reduced CH<sub>4</sub> production (g/d), yield (g/kg DMI), and intensity (g/kg ECM) by 19.5, 11.9, and 17.2 %, respectively, whereas H<sub>2</sub> yield (g/kg DMI) was increased by 261 %. Ruminal redox value was decreased by nitrate, and individual rumen volatile fatty acid proportions reflected a more reduced rumen environment although propionate proportions decreased. Nutrient digestibility was not affected by nitrate although microbial CP efficiency (g of microbial CP/kg true rumen digested organic matter) was decreased. Supplementing fumaric acid in combination with nitrate decreased H<sub>2</sub> production by 26.8 % compared to nitrate fed cows, and this was associated with increased propionate concentrations. However, there was no effect on H<sub>2</sub> emission when corrected for dry matter intake (DMI) or energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield. There were no effects of any of the treatments on DMI or ECM yield. In conclusion, the results demonstrated a CH<sub>4</sub> mitigating effect of nitrate supplementation resulting in increased H<sub>2</sub> emission. The effects on nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation were minor. Fumaric acid supplementation redirected some H<sub>2</sub> to propionate, although the efficiency was small. Supplementation of methanotrophic bacteria did not suppress CH<sub>4</sub> emission.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"289 ","pages":"Article 105572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001781/pdfft?md5=f35777efa19e6f6d91ce2e4dc6bc94e0&pid=1-s2.0-S1871141324001781-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of dietary nitrate, fumaric acid, and methanotrophic bacteria supplementation on rumino-intestinal nutrient metabolism and enteric gas exchange in dairy cows\",\"authors\":\"Morten Maigaard,&nbsp;Martin R. Weisbjerg,&nbsp;Mette Olaf Nielsen,&nbsp;Anne Louise Frydendahl Hellwing,&nbsp;Peter Lund\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of two approaches for enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) mitigation and one approach for redirection of excess hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) resulting from CH<sub>4</sub> inhibition, on dairy cows’ gas exchange and nutrient digestibility. Approaches for CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation were methanotrophic bacteria supplementation and dietary nitrate, whereas the approach for H<sub>2</sub> redirection was nitrate combined with fumaric acid. An incomplete 6 × 6 Latin square design experiment was conducted with 4 periods of 21 d using 6 rumen, duodenum, and ileum cannulated Danish Holstein cows with DIM of 123 ± 64.8 d (mean ± SD) and the milk yield was 33.6 ± 9.39 kg/d at beginning of experiment. The treatments were organized in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement, where the first factor represented treatments without or with methanotrophic bacteria supplementation (MET), and the second factor represented 3 different dietary additive supplementations (DIET). These were a basal diet (BAS; no additives), a diet with nitrate (NIT; 10 g nitrate/kg dry matter (DM)), and a diet with nitrate combined with fumaric acid (NIT-F; NIT + 15 g fumaric acid/kg DM). Cows had ad libitum access to diets with a forage to concentrate ratio of 60 to 40 on dry matter basis. Following adaptation to experimental diets, samples of rumen fluid, digesta from duodenum and ileum, and feces were collected to estimate nutrient digestibility using Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> as external flow markers. Then, gas exchanges were measured in respiration chambers. There was no CH<sub>4</sub> mitigating effect of MET. Nitrate reduced CH<sub>4</sub> production (g/d), yield (g/kg DMI), and intensity (g/kg ECM) by 19.5, 11.9, and 17.2 %, respectively, whereas H<sub>2</sub> yield (g/kg DMI) was increased by 261 %. Ruminal redox value was decreased by nitrate, and individual rumen volatile fatty acid proportions reflected a more reduced rumen environment although propionate proportions decreased. Nutrient digestibility was not affected by nitrate although microbial CP efficiency (g of microbial CP/kg true rumen digested organic matter) was decreased. Supplementing fumaric acid in combination with nitrate decreased H<sub>2</sub> production by 26.8 % compared to nitrate fed cows, and this was associated with increased propionate concentrations. However, there was no effect on H<sub>2</sub> emission when corrected for dry matter intake (DMI) or energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield. There were no effects of any of the treatments on DMI or ECM yield. In conclusion, the results demonstrated a CH<sub>4</sub> mitigating effect of nitrate supplementation resulting in increased H<sub>2</sub> emission. The effects on nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation were minor. Fumaric acid supplementation redirected some H<sub>2</sub> to propionate, although the efficiency was small. Supplementation of methanotrophic bacteria did not suppress CH<sub>4</sub> emission.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Livestock Science\",\"volume\":\"289 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001781/pdfft?md5=f35777efa19e6f6d91ce2e4dc6bc94e0&pid=1-s2.0-S1871141324001781-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Livestock Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001781\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是调查两种缓解肠道甲烷(CH4)的方法和一种调整抑制 CH4 产生的过量氢气(H2)的方法对奶牛气体交换和营养消化率的影响。缓解 CH4 的方法是补充甲烷营养菌和日粮硝酸盐,而调整 H2 的方法是硝酸盐与富马酸的结合。使用 6 头瘤胃、十二指肠和回肠插管的丹麦荷斯坦奶牛(DIM 为 123 ± 64.8 d,平均 ± SD)进行了不完全 6 × 6 拉丁正方形设计实验,实验开始时的产奶量为 33.6 ± 9.39 kg/d,共 4 期,每期 21 d。试验采用 2 × 3 的因子排列,第一个因子代表不添加或添加甲烷营养菌(MET),第二个因子代表 3 种不同的日粮添加剂(DIET)。它们分别是基础日粮(BAS;无添加剂)、添加硝酸盐的日粮(NIT;10 克硝酸盐/千克干物质(DM))以及添加硝酸盐和富马酸的日粮(NIT-F;NIT + 15 克富马酸/千克 DM)。奶牛可自由采食干物质基础上饲草与精料比例为 60:40 的日粮。在适应实验日粮之后,收集瘤胃液、十二指肠和回肠消化液以及粪便样本,使用Cr2O3和TiO2作为外部流量标记来估算养分消化率。然后,在呼吸室中测量气体交换。MET 没有缓解 CH4 的作用。硝酸盐使 CH4 产量(克/天)、产率(克/千克 DMI)和强度(克/千克 ECM)分别降低了 19.5%、11.9% 和 17.2%,而 H2 产量(克/千克 DMI)增加了 261%。硝酸盐降低了瘤胃氧化还原值,瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸的比例反映出瘤胃环境更加恶化,但丙酸比例有所下降。营养消化率不受硝酸盐的影响,但微生物CP效率(克微生物CP/千克真正的瘤胃消化有机物)有所降低。与饲喂硝酸盐的奶牛相比,在添加富马酸的同时添加硝酸盐可使H2产生量减少26.8%,这与丙酸盐浓度增加有关。但是,根据干物质摄入量(DMI)或能量校正牛奶产量(ECM)进行校正后,对 H2 排放量没有影响。任何处理对干物质摄入量或 ECM 产量都没有影响。总之,研究结果表明,补充硝酸盐可减少 CH4 排放,从而增加 H2 排放量。对养分消化率和瘤胃发酵的影响较小。补充富马酸可将部分 H2 转化为丙酸,但效率较低。补充甲烷营养细菌并未抑制 CH4 的排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of dietary nitrate, fumaric acid, and methanotrophic bacteria supplementation on rumino-intestinal nutrient metabolism and enteric gas exchange in dairy cows

The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of two approaches for enteric methane (CH4) mitigation and one approach for redirection of excess hydrogen (H2) resulting from CH4 inhibition, on dairy cows’ gas exchange and nutrient digestibility. Approaches for CH4 mitigation were methanotrophic bacteria supplementation and dietary nitrate, whereas the approach for H2 redirection was nitrate combined with fumaric acid. An incomplete 6 × 6 Latin square design experiment was conducted with 4 periods of 21 d using 6 rumen, duodenum, and ileum cannulated Danish Holstein cows with DIM of 123 ± 64.8 d (mean ± SD) and the milk yield was 33.6 ± 9.39 kg/d at beginning of experiment. The treatments were organized in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement, where the first factor represented treatments without or with methanotrophic bacteria supplementation (MET), and the second factor represented 3 different dietary additive supplementations (DIET). These were a basal diet (BAS; no additives), a diet with nitrate (NIT; 10 g nitrate/kg dry matter (DM)), and a diet with nitrate combined with fumaric acid (NIT-F; NIT + 15 g fumaric acid/kg DM). Cows had ad libitum access to diets with a forage to concentrate ratio of 60 to 40 on dry matter basis. Following adaptation to experimental diets, samples of rumen fluid, digesta from duodenum and ileum, and feces were collected to estimate nutrient digestibility using Cr2O3 and TiO2 as external flow markers. Then, gas exchanges were measured in respiration chambers. There was no CH4 mitigating effect of MET. Nitrate reduced CH4 production (g/d), yield (g/kg DMI), and intensity (g/kg ECM) by 19.5, 11.9, and 17.2 %, respectively, whereas H2 yield (g/kg DMI) was increased by 261 %. Ruminal redox value was decreased by nitrate, and individual rumen volatile fatty acid proportions reflected a more reduced rumen environment although propionate proportions decreased. Nutrient digestibility was not affected by nitrate although microbial CP efficiency (g of microbial CP/kg true rumen digested organic matter) was decreased. Supplementing fumaric acid in combination with nitrate decreased H2 production by 26.8 % compared to nitrate fed cows, and this was associated with increased propionate concentrations. However, there was no effect on H2 emission when corrected for dry matter intake (DMI) or energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield. There were no effects of any of the treatments on DMI or ECM yield. In conclusion, the results demonstrated a CH4 mitigating effect of nitrate supplementation resulting in increased H2 emission. The effects on nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation were minor. Fumaric acid supplementation redirected some H2 to propionate, although the efficiency was small. Supplementation of methanotrophic bacteria did not suppress CH4 emission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信