还原信息会提高科学解释的满意度吗?还原诱惑效应的三个预先注册测试

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
{"title":"还原信息会提高科学解释的满意度吗?还原诱惑效应的三个预先注册测试","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding information processing biases is critical for improving scientific literacy. Research suggests that people rate scientific explanations with reductive jargon (e.g., irrelevant chemistry jargon in the explanation of a biological phenomenon) as better than those without – a phenomenon known as the reductive allure (RA) effect. Here, however, in three preregistered online experiments, we were unable to replicate this reductive allure effect using similar (and in some cases identical) materials and procedures to the original demonstration of the phenomena. Our results suggest that text-based RA effects may not be as strong as previously thought and are possibly changing over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does reductive information increase satisfaction with scientific explanations? Three preregistered tests of the reductive allure effect\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding information processing biases is critical for improving scientific literacy. Research suggests that people rate scientific explanations with reductive jargon (e.g., irrelevant chemistry jargon in the explanation of a biological phenomenon) as better than those without – a phenomenon known as the reductive allure (RA) effect. Here, however, in three preregistered online experiments, we were unable to replicate this reductive allure effect using similar (and in some cases identical) materials and procedures to the original demonstration of the phenomena. Our results suggest that text-based RA effects may not be as strong as previously thought and are possibly changing over time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724002270\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724002270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解信息处理偏差对于提高科学素养至关重要。研究表明,人们对使用还原性专业术语(例如,在解释生物现象时使用无关的化学专业术语)的科学解释的评价要好于没有还原性专业术语的解释--这种现象被称为还原性诱惑(RA)效应。然而,在这里,在三个预先登记的在线实验中,我们使用了与原始现象演示相似(在某些情况下完全相同)的材料和程序,却无法复制这种还原诱惑效应。我们的结果表明,基于文本的还原诱惑效应可能并不像以前认为的那样强烈,而且可能会随着时间的推移而发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does reductive information increase satisfaction with scientific explanations? Three preregistered tests of the reductive allure effect

Understanding information processing biases is critical for improving scientific literacy. Research suggests that people rate scientific explanations with reductive jargon (e.g., irrelevant chemistry jargon in the explanation of a biological phenomenon) as better than those without – a phenomenon known as the reductive allure (RA) effect. Here, however, in three preregistered online experiments, we were unable to replicate this reductive allure effect using similar (and in some cases identical) materials and procedures to the original demonstration of the phenomena. Our results suggest that text-based RA effects may not be as strong as previously thought and are possibly changing over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信