Are aeolian ichnofacies distinctive and useful? An analysis of trace fossil assemblages from Cretaceous aeolian facies in northern Patagonia, Argentina

In this paper, Cretaceous trace fossil assemblages are reported from aeolian facies within four units from Patagonia, Argentina, to evaluate the usefulness of the aeolian ichnofacies concept. From oldest to youngest, studied units comprise the Agrio (Valanginian-Hauterivian), Cerro Barcino (Aptian-Cenomanian), Candeleros (Cenomanian), and Allen (Campanian-Maastrichtian) formations. Twenty one ichnotaxa were recorded, including ten of invertebrate origin (Archaeonassa fossulata, Arenicolites tenuis, Beaconites isp., Digitichnus laminatus, Edaphichnium lumbricatum, cf. Octopodichnus isp., Palaeophycus tubularis, Skolithos linearis, Taenidium barretti, and an unidentified arthropod trackway), seven tetrapod footprints and burrows (Avipeda isp., Brasilichnium isp., cf. Chelonipus isp., Reniformichnus katikatii, two types of indeterminate footprints, and burrow fills) and four rhizolith types. Entradichnus meniscus (formerly used as eponym of an aeolian ichnofacies) is considered a junior synonym of Taenidium barretti. Common ichnotaxa in aeolian and fluvial sequences like Taenidium barretti, Skolithos linearis and Palaeophycus tubularis are facies-crossing ichnotaxa and should not be used to distinguish ichnofacies. Trace fossil assemblages and ichnofabrics from aeolian dune, dry interdune and wet interdune facies are interpreted in terms of the potential producers and their palaeoecological and palaeoenvironmental constraints. This procedure is more informative than the ichnofacies approach in aeolian deposits. Based on a literature review of 32 examples of trace fossil assemblages from Cretaceous aeolian sequences worldwide, we conclude that the most distinctive ichnotaxa occur in aeolian dunes, including Brasilichnium, Farlowichnus, lacertoid footprints, Octopodichnus and Paleohelcura. It is recommended to abandon the usage of the Chelichnus, Entradichnus and Entradichnus-Octopodichnus ichnofacies, which are poorly defined in terms of recurrence and environmental significance or based on uncharacteristic or unavailable ichnotaxa. We propose a new definition of the Octopodichnus ichnofacies, diagnosed by the presence of subequant tetrapod footprints in quadrupedal trackways and/or selected arachnid /insect trackways. This ichnofacies is a taphofacies recorded from the Permian to the Cretaceous, and probably extends to the Cenozoic.