人类接触全氟辛烷磺酸的差距日益扩大:1999-2018年NHANES中全氟和多氟烷基物质浓度的研究结果

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Maosen Liao , Shan Niu , Wenhong Fan , Fujun Ma , Zhaomin Dong
{"title":"人类接触全氟辛烷磺酸的差距日益扩大:1999-2018年NHANES中全氟和多氟烷基物质浓度的研究结果","authors":"Maosen Liao ,&nbsp;Shan Niu ,&nbsp;Wenhong Fan ,&nbsp;Fujun Ma ,&nbsp;Zhaomin Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The disparities in exposure to environmental hazards have fueled the environmental justice movement, which has garnered increasing attention and momentum over the past few decades. However, research addressing exposure disparities pertaining to chemicals remains notably limited. Here, leveraging data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey spanning the period from 1999 to 2018, we unveiled that the perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) exhibited the highest concentration in human biomonitoring in general U.S. population, with a mean value of 14.54 ± 19.59 ng/ml. Subsequently, the mean concentrations of Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) were 3.33 ± 3.19, 2.29 ± 3.13, 1.07 ± 1.30, and 0.34 ± 0.71, respectively. Meanwhile, although females or Non-hispanic White exhibited relatively higher levels for most per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) compared to other groups. The individuals with higher household incomes demonstrated elevated exposure to PFASs. Interestingly, despite lower exposure burdens were observed in Non-Hispanic Black individuals, females, and individuals with low family income, we identified relatively higher exposure disparities in these populations. In particular, exposure disparities for general U.S. population exposure to PFOS exhibited an approximate 50 % increase from 1999 to 2018, despite a concurrent decline of 84 % in biomonitoring levels. Meanwhile, the population aging has led to an exacerbation of human exposure to PFOS by 12.4 %. Our findings underscore the necessity of ensuring equitable protection from PFAS exposure for all populations, although further investigation is required to understand the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 103824"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424003006/pdfft?md5=7389f1a8d0d418f622335cb5c35ed51f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352186424003006-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing disparities in human exposure to perfluorooctanesulfonic acid: Findings from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance concentrations in 1999–2018 NHANES\",\"authors\":\"Maosen Liao ,&nbsp;Shan Niu ,&nbsp;Wenhong Fan ,&nbsp;Fujun Ma ,&nbsp;Zhaomin Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The disparities in exposure to environmental hazards have fueled the environmental justice movement, which has garnered increasing attention and momentum over the past few decades. However, research addressing exposure disparities pertaining to chemicals remains notably limited. Here, leveraging data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey spanning the period from 1999 to 2018, we unveiled that the perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) exhibited the highest concentration in human biomonitoring in general U.S. population, with a mean value of 14.54 ± 19.59 ng/ml. Subsequently, the mean concentrations of Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) were 3.33 ± 3.19, 2.29 ± 3.13, 1.07 ± 1.30, and 0.34 ± 0.71, respectively. Meanwhile, although females or Non-hispanic White exhibited relatively higher levels for most per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) compared to other groups. The individuals with higher household incomes demonstrated elevated exposure to PFASs. Interestingly, despite lower exposure burdens were observed in Non-Hispanic Black individuals, females, and individuals with low family income, we identified relatively higher exposure disparities in these populations. In particular, exposure disparities for general U.S. population exposure to PFOS exhibited an approximate 50 % increase from 1999 to 2018, despite a concurrent decline of 84 % in biomonitoring levels. Meanwhile, the population aging has led to an exacerbation of human exposure to PFOS by 12.4 %. Our findings underscore the necessity of ensuring equitable protection from PFAS exposure for all populations, although further investigation is required to understand the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424003006/pdfft?md5=7389f1a8d0d418f622335cb5c35ed51f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352186424003006-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424003006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424003006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暴露于环境危害中的差异推动了环境正义运动的发展,在过去几十年中,该运动获得了越来越多的关注和动力。然而,针对化学品暴露差异的研究仍然非常有限。在此,我们利用 1999 年至 2018 年期间的国家健康与营养调查数据,揭示了全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)在美国普通人群的人体生物监测中表现出的最高浓度,平均值为 14.54 ± 19.59 纳克/毫升。随后,全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)、全氟壬酸(PFNA)和全氟癸酸(PFDA)的平均浓度分别为 3.33 ± 3.19、2.29 ± 3.13、1.07 ± 1.30 和 0.34 ± 0.71。同时,与其他群体相比,女性或非西班牙裔白人在大多数全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)中的含量相对较高。家庭收入较高的人暴露于全氟辛烷磺酸的程度更高。有趣的是,尽管在非西班牙裔黑人、女性和家庭收入较低的人群中观察到的暴露负担较低,但我们发现这些人群中的暴露差异相对较高。特别是,从 1999 年到 2018 年,尽管生物监测水平同时下降了 84%,但全氟辛烷磺酸在美国普通人群中的暴露差异却增加了约 50%。同时,人口老龄化导致人类对全氟辛烷磺酸的暴露加剧了 12.4%。我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要确保公平保护所有人群免受全氟辛烷磺酸暴露的影响,尽管还需要进一步调查,以了解造成这些差异的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing disparities in human exposure to perfluorooctanesulfonic acid: Findings from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance concentrations in 1999–2018 NHANES

The disparities in exposure to environmental hazards have fueled the environmental justice movement, which has garnered increasing attention and momentum over the past few decades. However, research addressing exposure disparities pertaining to chemicals remains notably limited. Here, leveraging data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey spanning the period from 1999 to 2018, we unveiled that the perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) exhibited the highest concentration in human biomonitoring in general U.S. population, with a mean value of 14.54 ± 19.59 ng/ml. Subsequently, the mean concentrations of Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) were 3.33 ± 3.19, 2.29 ± 3.13, 1.07 ± 1.30, and 0.34 ± 0.71, respectively. Meanwhile, although females or Non-hispanic White exhibited relatively higher levels for most per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) compared to other groups. The individuals with higher household incomes demonstrated elevated exposure to PFASs. Interestingly, despite lower exposure burdens were observed in Non-Hispanic Black individuals, females, and individuals with low family income, we identified relatively higher exposure disparities in these populations. In particular, exposure disparities for general U.S. population exposure to PFOS exhibited an approximate 50 % increase from 1999 to 2018, despite a concurrent decline of 84 % in biomonitoring levels. Meanwhile, the population aging has led to an exacerbation of human exposure to PFOS by 12.4 %. Our findings underscore the necessity of ensuring equitable protection from PFAS exposure for all populations, although further investigation is required to understand the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信