刚性路面的状况指数:利用密歇根州 PMS 数据对各州 DOT 进行比较分析

Rahul Raj Singh , Mumtahin Hasnat , Muhammed Emin Kutay , Syed Waqar Haider , James Bryce , Bora Cetin
{"title":"刚性路面的状况指数:利用密歇根州 PMS 数据对各州 DOT 进行比较分析","authors":"Rahul Raj Singh ,&nbsp;Mumtahin Hasnat ,&nbsp;Muhammed Emin Kutay ,&nbsp;Syed Waqar Haider ,&nbsp;James Bryce ,&nbsp;Bora Cetin","doi":"10.1016/j.jreng.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pavement infrastructure is vital in providing services and links between various sectors of society. Therefore, the preservation and maintenance of these roads are critical to attaining a pavement network in good condition throughout its service life. Various performance indicators like the international roughness index (IRI), pavement condition index (PCI), and present serviceability rating (PSR) have been used by the state department of transportation (DOT) and highway agencies for evaluating pavement surface conditions and planning future maintenance strategies. Limited data availability, multiple distresses depending on region, lack of correlation of these condition indices to maintenance strategies, and data collection limitations pose a challenge for applying these indices to local conditions. This paper compares condition indices of different states for rigid pavements. Further, using a specific condition index for local conditions is also highlighted. For this purpose, five states and their corresponding condition indices were evaluated and compared to the Michigan DOT distress index (DI). These states include Virginia, Minnesota, North Dakota, Louisiana, and Oregon. The corresponding distresses of each condition index were converted to make them compatible with the MDOT DI. This study used the MDOT's pavement management system (PMS) database to evaluate each condition index for 433 rigid pavement sections. Each distress index was plotted against MDOT DI and compared using a paired <em>t</em>-test. Results show that the condition indices of Virginia and Minnesota are comparable to DI in terms of the Spearman correlation value. The <em>t</em>-test results show that except for Virgina, condition indices from other states statistically differ from DI. Therefore, one can't use those directly for local conditions in Michigan. This paper presents the evaluation and data requirements for each condition index and its impact on selecting a maintenance treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097049824000337/pdfft?md5=4421143f6e847a052e7a6d408c1fe9ac&pid=1-s2.0-S2097049824000337-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Condition indices for rigid pavements: A comparative analysis of state DOTs using Michigan PMS data\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Raj Singh ,&nbsp;Mumtahin Hasnat ,&nbsp;Muhammed Emin Kutay ,&nbsp;Syed Waqar Haider ,&nbsp;James Bryce ,&nbsp;Bora Cetin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jreng.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pavement infrastructure is vital in providing services and links between various sectors of society. Therefore, the preservation and maintenance of these roads are critical to attaining a pavement network in good condition throughout its service life. Various performance indicators like the international roughness index (IRI), pavement condition index (PCI), and present serviceability rating (PSR) have been used by the state department of transportation (DOT) and highway agencies for evaluating pavement surface conditions and planning future maintenance strategies. Limited data availability, multiple distresses depending on region, lack of correlation of these condition indices to maintenance strategies, and data collection limitations pose a challenge for applying these indices to local conditions. This paper compares condition indices of different states for rigid pavements. Further, using a specific condition index for local conditions is also highlighted. For this purpose, five states and their corresponding condition indices were evaluated and compared to the Michigan DOT distress index (DI). These states include Virginia, Minnesota, North Dakota, Louisiana, and Oregon. The corresponding distresses of each condition index were converted to make them compatible with the MDOT DI. This study used the MDOT's pavement management system (PMS) database to evaluate each condition index for 433 rigid pavement sections. Each distress index was plotted against MDOT DI and compared using a paired <em>t</em>-test. Results show that the condition indices of Virginia and Minnesota are comparable to DI in terms of the Spearman correlation value. The <em>t</em>-test results show that except for Virgina, condition indices from other states statistically differ from DI. Therefore, one can't use those directly for local conditions in Michigan. This paper presents the evaluation and data requirements for each condition index and its impact on selecting a maintenance treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Road Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097049824000337/pdfft?md5=4421143f6e847a052e7a6d408c1fe9ac&pid=1-s2.0-S2097049824000337-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Road Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097049824000337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097049824000337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

路面基础设施对于提供服务和连接社会各部门至关重要。因此,这些道路的保护和维护对于实现路面网络在整个使用寿命期间保持良好状态至关重要。各州交通部门(DOT)和公路机构一直在使用各种性能指标,如国际粗糙度指数(IRI)、路面状况指数(PCI)和当前适用性评级(PSR),来评估路面表面状况和规划未来的维护策略。有限的数据可用性、因地区而异的多重损坏、这些状况指数与维护策略缺乏相关性以及数据收集的局限性,都为将这些指数应用于当地状况带来了挑战。本文比较了不同状态下刚性路面的状况指数。此外,还重点介绍了针对当地条件使用特定状况指数的情况。为此,本文对五个州及其相应的路况指数进行了评估,并与密歇根州交通局的路况指数(DI)进行了比较。这些州包括弗吉尼亚州、明尼苏达州、北达科他州、路易斯安那州和俄勒冈州。每个状况指数的相应窘迫程度都经过转换,使其与密歇根州交通局的窘迫程度指数相匹配。本研究使用 MDOT 的路面管理系统 (PMS) 数据库来评估 433 个刚性路面路段的各项状况指数。每个窘迫指数都与 MDOT DI 相对应,并使用配对 t 检验进行比较。结果表明,就 Spearman 相关值而言,弗吉尼亚州和明尼苏达州的状况指数与 DI 具有可比性。t 检验结果表明,除弗吉尼亚州外,其他各州的状况指数与 DI 存在统计学差异。因此,我们不能将这些指数直接用于密歇根州的当地情况。本文介绍了各条件指数的评估和数据要求及其对选择维持治疗方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Condition indices for rigid pavements: A comparative analysis of state DOTs using Michigan PMS data

Pavement infrastructure is vital in providing services and links between various sectors of society. Therefore, the preservation and maintenance of these roads are critical to attaining a pavement network in good condition throughout its service life. Various performance indicators like the international roughness index (IRI), pavement condition index (PCI), and present serviceability rating (PSR) have been used by the state department of transportation (DOT) and highway agencies for evaluating pavement surface conditions and planning future maintenance strategies. Limited data availability, multiple distresses depending on region, lack of correlation of these condition indices to maintenance strategies, and data collection limitations pose a challenge for applying these indices to local conditions. This paper compares condition indices of different states for rigid pavements. Further, using a specific condition index for local conditions is also highlighted. For this purpose, five states and their corresponding condition indices were evaluated and compared to the Michigan DOT distress index (DI). These states include Virginia, Minnesota, North Dakota, Louisiana, and Oregon. The corresponding distresses of each condition index were converted to make them compatible with the MDOT DI. This study used the MDOT's pavement management system (PMS) database to evaluate each condition index for 433 rigid pavement sections. Each distress index was plotted against MDOT DI and compared using a paired t-test. Results show that the condition indices of Virginia and Minnesota are comparable to DI in terms of the Spearman correlation value. The t-test results show that except for Virgina, condition indices from other states statistically differ from DI. Therefore, one can't use those directly for local conditions in Michigan. This paper presents the evaluation and data requirements for each condition index and its impact on selecting a maintenance treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信