双排拼接试验下超高强度混凝土中搭接砂涂层变形 GFRP 钢筋的粘结滑移行为

IF 10.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Xinyu Hu, Weichen Xue, Jiafei Jiang
{"title":"双排拼接试验下超高强度混凝土中搭接砂涂层变形 GFRP 钢筋的粘结滑移行为","authors":"Xinyu Hu,&nbsp;Weichen Xue,&nbsp;Jiafei Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Novel Ultra-High-Performance-Concrete (UHPC) structures reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) rebars are promising candidates for applications in important infrastructures under exposed environments where normal concrete and steel rebars may falter. This paper aims to assess the bond-slip behavior between lapped sand-coated deformed Glass FRP (GFRP) rebars and UHPC using double-row splice tests, with parameters including bar diameter, splice length and lap clearance. Failure modes including the pullout of GFRP rebars and the splitting of UHPC were identified. For cases of pullout failure, the average bond strengths in samples with splice lengths of 5<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub> were reduced by 17.6–22.1 % compared to those of 2.5<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub>. Increasing the lap clearance from 0 to 1<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub> and 2<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub> led to 11.1 % and 30.2 % increases in average bond strengths. Furthermore, average bond-slip models for lapped sand-coated deformed GFRP rebars in UHPC were developed. The predicted curves matched the experimental ones, showing errors within 20 % for both average bond stresses and slips. When the cover is not less than 2<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub>, the splice length is recommended to be at least 15<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub> for sand-coated deformed GFRP rebars with diameters of 10 mm–16 mm in UHPC, approximately 1.25 times the corresponding development length proposed by the existing research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9865,"journal":{"name":"Cement & concrete composites","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 105746"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond-slip behavior of lapped sand-coated deformed GFRP rebars in UHPC under double-row splice test\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Hu,&nbsp;Weichen Xue,&nbsp;Jiafei Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Novel Ultra-High-Performance-Concrete (UHPC) structures reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) rebars are promising candidates for applications in important infrastructures under exposed environments where normal concrete and steel rebars may falter. This paper aims to assess the bond-slip behavior between lapped sand-coated deformed Glass FRP (GFRP) rebars and UHPC using double-row splice tests, with parameters including bar diameter, splice length and lap clearance. Failure modes including the pullout of GFRP rebars and the splitting of UHPC were identified. For cases of pullout failure, the average bond strengths in samples with splice lengths of 5<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub> were reduced by 17.6–22.1 % compared to those of 2.5<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub>. Increasing the lap clearance from 0 to 1<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub> and 2<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub> led to 11.1 % and 30.2 % increases in average bond strengths. Furthermore, average bond-slip models for lapped sand-coated deformed GFRP rebars in UHPC were developed. The predicted curves matched the experimental ones, showing errors within 20 % for both average bond stresses and slips. When the cover is not less than 2<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub>, the splice length is recommended to be at least 15<em>d</em><sub><em>b</em></sub> for sand-coated deformed GFRP rebars with diameters of 10 mm–16 mm in UHPC, approximately 1.25 times the corresponding development length proposed by the existing research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cement & concrete composites\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cement & concrete composites\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958946524003196\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cement & concrete composites","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958946524003196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用纤维增强聚合物(FRP)钢筋加固的新型超高性能混凝土(UHPC)结构有望应用于暴露环境下的重要基础设施中,而普通混凝土和钢筋在这些环境下可能会出现问题。本文旨在使用双排拼接试验评估搭接砂涂层变形玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)螺纹钢和超高性能混凝土之间的粘结滑移行为,试验参数包括钢筋直径、拼接长度和搭接间隙。确定的失效模式包括玻璃纤维增强塑料(GFRP)钢筋的拉拔和超高强度聚碳酸酯(UHPC)的劈裂。在拉出失效的情况下,拼接长度为 5db 的样品的平均粘结强度比 2.5db 的样品降低了 17.6-22.1%。将搭接间隙从 0 增加到 1db 和 2db,平均粘接强度分别增加了 11.1% 和 30.2%。此外,还为超高强度混凝土中的砂涂层变形 GFRP 钢筋建立了平均粘结滑移模型。预测曲线与实验曲线相吻合,平均粘结应力和滑移误差均在 20% 以内。当覆盖率不小于 2db 时,建议在 UHPC 中直径为 10 mm-16 mm 的砂涂层变形 GFRP 螺纹钢的拼接长度至少为 15db,约为现有研究提出的相应开发长度的 1.25 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bond-slip behavior of lapped sand-coated deformed GFRP rebars in UHPC under double-row splice test

Novel Ultra-High-Performance-Concrete (UHPC) structures reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) rebars are promising candidates for applications in important infrastructures under exposed environments where normal concrete and steel rebars may falter. This paper aims to assess the bond-slip behavior between lapped sand-coated deformed Glass FRP (GFRP) rebars and UHPC using double-row splice tests, with parameters including bar diameter, splice length and lap clearance. Failure modes including the pullout of GFRP rebars and the splitting of UHPC were identified. For cases of pullout failure, the average bond strengths in samples with splice lengths of 5db were reduced by 17.6–22.1 % compared to those of 2.5db. Increasing the lap clearance from 0 to 1db and 2db led to 11.1 % and 30.2 % increases in average bond strengths. Furthermore, average bond-slip models for lapped sand-coated deformed GFRP rebars in UHPC were developed. The predicted curves matched the experimental ones, showing errors within 20 % for both average bond stresses and slips. When the cover is not less than 2db, the splice length is recommended to be at least 15db for sand-coated deformed GFRP rebars with diameters of 10 mm–16 mm in UHPC, approximately 1.25 times the corresponding development length proposed by the existing research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cement & concrete composites
Cement & concrete composites 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
11.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Cement & concrete composites focuses on advancements in cement-concrete composite technology and the production, use, and performance of cement-based construction materials. It covers a wide range of materials, including fiber-reinforced composites, polymer composites, ferrocement, and those incorporating special aggregates or waste materials. Major themes include microstructure, material properties, testing, durability, mechanics, modeling, design, fabrication, and practical applications. The journal welcomes papers on structural behavior, field studies, repair and maintenance, serviceability, and sustainability. It aims to enhance understanding, provide a platform for unconventional materials, promote low-cost energy-saving materials, and bridge the gap between materials science, engineering, and construction. Special issues on emerging topics are also published to encourage collaboration between materials scientists, engineers, designers, and fabricators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信