Praveen Kalura, Ashish Pandey, V. M. Chowdary, Deen Dayal
{"title":"通过分布式物理模型评估印度热带集水区卫星降水产品的水文响应","authors":"Praveen Kalura, Ashish Pandey, V. M. Chowdary, Deen Dayal","doi":"10.1002/hyp.15275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Significant advancements in satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms have led to the development of continuous, quasi-global precipitation products, offering unique opportunities for hydrometeorological and climate research. In this context, six satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs), including CHIRPS, CMORPH, GSMaP, IMERG, MSWEP, and PERSIANN, were thoroughly investigated for their application in hydrological simulations over the Wardha River basin in India. The observed gridded precipitation product developed by India Meteorological Department (IMD) has been used as reference data to evaluate the performance of SPPs. Hydrological variables such as runoff, soil moisture (SM) and evapotranspiration (ET) were simulated using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model. The performances of SPPs are critically assessed using various statistical metrics, including Pearson's correlation coefficient (<i>R</i>), Klinga-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), root mean square error (RMSE), and the RMSE to standard deviation ratio (RSR). The model-simulated discharge was compared with streamflow observations at a single gauging site, while a spatially distributed comparison was conducted between simulated SM and ET and satellite-based SM and ET. The IMD dataset consistently shows superior performance for discharge simulation at both daily and monthly scales, with KGE values of 0.85 and 0.91, respectively. Among SPPs, MSWEP and CHIRPS excel in simulating daily and monthly discharge, respectively. For ET simulation, CHIRPS outperforms IMD and other SPPs, achieving an overall KGE value of 0.37. In contrast, PERSIANN is the most effective for simulating SM compared to other precipitation products.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"38 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating hydrological responses of satellite precipitation products over an Indian tropical catchment through a distributed physical model\",\"authors\":\"Praveen Kalura, Ashish Pandey, V. M. Chowdary, Deen Dayal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.15275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Significant advancements in satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms have led to the development of continuous, quasi-global precipitation products, offering unique opportunities for hydrometeorological and climate research. In this context, six satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs), including CHIRPS, CMORPH, GSMaP, IMERG, MSWEP, and PERSIANN, were thoroughly investigated for their application in hydrological simulations over the Wardha River basin in India. The observed gridded precipitation product developed by India Meteorological Department (IMD) has been used as reference data to evaluate the performance of SPPs. Hydrological variables such as runoff, soil moisture (SM) and evapotranspiration (ET) were simulated using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model. The performances of SPPs are critically assessed using various statistical metrics, including Pearson's correlation coefficient (<i>R</i>), Klinga-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), root mean square error (RMSE), and the RMSE to standard deviation ratio (RSR). The model-simulated discharge was compared with streamflow observations at a single gauging site, while a spatially distributed comparison was conducted between simulated SM and ET and satellite-based SM and ET. The IMD dataset consistently shows superior performance for discharge simulation at both daily and monthly scales, with KGE values of 0.85 and 0.91, respectively. Among SPPs, MSWEP and CHIRPS excel in simulating daily and monthly discharge, respectively. For ET simulation, CHIRPS outperforms IMD and other SPPs, achieving an overall KGE value of 0.37. In contrast, PERSIANN is the most effective for simulating SM compared to other precipitation products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"38 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15275\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating hydrological responses of satellite precipitation products over an Indian tropical catchment through a distributed physical model
Significant advancements in satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms have led to the development of continuous, quasi-global precipitation products, offering unique opportunities for hydrometeorological and climate research. In this context, six satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs), including CHIRPS, CMORPH, GSMaP, IMERG, MSWEP, and PERSIANN, were thoroughly investigated for their application in hydrological simulations over the Wardha River basin in India. The observed gridded precipitation product developed by India Meteorological Department (IMD) has been used as reference data to evaluate the performance of SPPs. Hydrological variables such as runoff, soil moisture (SM) and evapotranspiration (ET) were simulated using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model. The performances of SPPs are critically assessed using various statistical metrics, including Pearson's correlation coefficient (R), Klinga-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), root mean square error (RMSE), and the RMSE to standard deviation ratio (RSR). The model-simulated discharge was compared with streamflow observations at a single gauging site, while a spatially distributed comparison was conducted between simulated SM and ET and satellite-based SM and ET. The IMD dataset consistently shows superior performance for discharge simulation at both daily and monthly scales, with KGE values of 0.85 and 0.91, respectively. Among SPPs, MSWEP and CHIRPS excel in simulating daily and monthly discharge, respectively. For ET simulation, CHIRPS outperforms IMD and other SPPs, achieving an overall KGE value of 0.37. In contrast, PERSIANN is the most effective for simulating SM compared to other precipitation products.
期刊介绍:
Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.