通过分布式物理模型评估印度热带集水区卫星降水产品的水文响应

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Praveen Kalura, Ashish Pandey, V. M. Chowdary, Deen Dayal
{"title":"通过分布式物理模型评估印度热带集水区卫星降水产品的水文响应","authors":"Praveen Kalura,&nbsp;Ashish Pandey,&nbsp;V. M. Chowdary,&nbsp;Deen Dayal","doi":"10.1002/hyp.15275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Significant advancements in satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms have led to the development of continuous, quasi-global precipitation products, offering unique opportunities for hydrometeorological and climate research. In this context, six satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs), including CHIRPS, CMORPH, GSMaP, IMERG, MSWEP, and PERSIANN, were thoroughly investigated for their application in hydrological simulations over the Wardha River basin in India. The observed gridded precipitation product developed by India Meteorological Department (IMD) has been used as reference data to evaluate the performance of SPPs. Hydrological variables such as runoff, soil moisture (SM) and evapotranspiration (ET) were simulated using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model. The performances of SPPs are critically assessed using various statistical metrics, including Pearson's correlation coefficient (<i>R</i>), Klinga-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), root mean square error (RMSE), and the RMSE to standard deviation ratio (RSR). The model-simulated discharge was compared with streamflow observations at a single gauging site, while a spatially distributed comparison was conducted between simulated SM and ET and satellite-based SM and ET. The IMD dataset consistently shows superior performance for discharge simulation at both daily and monthly scales, with KGE values of 0.85 and 0.91, respectively. Among SPPs, MSWEP and CHIRPS excel in simulating daily and monthly discharge, respectively. For ET simulation, CHIRPS outperforms IMD and other SPPs, achieving an overall KGE value of 0.37. In contrast, PERSIANN is the most effective for simulating SM compared to other precipitation products.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"38 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating hydrological responses of satellite precipitation products over an Indian tropical catchment through a distributed physical model\",\"authors\":\"Praveen Kalura,&nbsp;Ashish Pandey,&nbsp;V. M. Chowdary,&nbsp;Deen Dayal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.15275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Significant advancements in satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms have led to the development of continuous, quasi-global precipitation products, offering unique opportunities for hydrometeorological and climate research. In this context, six satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs), including CHIRPS, CMORPH, GSMaP, IMERG, MSWEP, and PERSIANN, were thoroughly investigated for their application in hydrological simulations over the Wardha River basin in India. The observed gridded precipitation product developed by India Meteorological Department (IMD) has been used as reference data to evaluate the performance of SPPs. Hydrological variables such as runoff, soil moisture (SM) and evapotranspiration (ET) were simulated using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model. The performances of SPPs are critically assessed using various statistical metrics, including Pearson's correlation coefficient (<i>R</i>), Klinga-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), root mean square error (RMSE), and the RMSE to standard deviation ratio (RSR). The model-simulated discharge was compared with streamflow observations at a single gauging site, while a spatially distributed comparison was conducted between simulated SM and ET and satellite-based SM and ET. The IMD dataset consistently shows superior performance for discharge simulation at both daily and monthly scales, with KGE values of 0.85 and 0.91, respectively. Among SPPs, MSWEP and CHIRPS excel in simulating daily and monthly discharge, respectively. For ET simulation, CHIRPS outperforms IMD and other SPPs, achieving an overall KGE value of 0.37. In contrast, PERSIANN is the most effective for simulating SM compared to other precipitation products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"38 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15275\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于卫星的降水检索算法取得了重大进展,开发出了连续的准全球降水产品,为水文气象和气候研究提供了独特的机会。在此背景下,对 CHIRPS、CMORPH、GSMaP、IMERG、MSWEP 和 PERSIANN 等六种星基降水产品(SPPs)进行了深入研究,以确定它们在印度沃达河流域水文模拟中的应用。印度气象局开发的观测网格降水产品被用作评估 SPP 性能的参考数据。使用可变渗透能力模型模拟了径流、土壤水分 (SM) 和蒸散 (ET) 等水文变量。使用各种统计指标对 SPP 的性能进行了严格评估,包括皮尔逊相关系数 (R)、克林加-古普塔效率 (KGE)、偏差百分比 (PBIAS)、均方根误差 (RMSE) 以及均方根误差与标准偏差比 (RSR)。将模型模拟的排水量与单个测流点的溪流观测数据进行了比较,同时将模拟的平均方差误差和蒸散发误差与基于卫星的平均方差误差和蒸散发误差进行了空间分布比较。在日和月尺度上,IMD 数据集始终显示出卓越的排水模拟性能,KGE 值分别为 0.85 和 0.91。在 SPP 中,MSWEP 和 CHIRPS 分别在模拟日和月排泄量方面表现出色。在蒸散发模拟方面,CHIRPS 优于 IMD 和其他 SPP,总体 KGE 值为 0.37。相比之下,与其他降水产品相比,PERSIANN 在模拟 SM 方面最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating hydrological responses of satellite precipitation products over an Indian tropical catchment through a distributed physical model

Evaluating hydrological responses of satellite precipitation products over an Indian tropical catchment through a distributed physical model

Significant advancements in satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms have led to the development of continuous, quasi-global precipitation products, offering unique opportunities for hydrometeorological and climate research. In this context, six satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs), including CHIRPS, CMORPH, GSMaP, IMERG, MSWEP, and PERSIANN, were thoroughly investigated for their application in hydrological simulations over the Wardha River basin in India. The observed gridded precipitation product developed by India Meteorological Department (IMD) has been used as reference data to evaluate the performance of SPPs. Hydrological variables such as runoff, soil moisture (SM) and evapotranspiration (ET) were simulated using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model. The performances of SPPs are critically assessed using various statistical metrics, including Pearson's correlation coefficient (R), Klinga-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), root mean square error (RMSE), and the RMSE to standard deviation ratio (RSR). The model-simulated discharge was compared with streamflow observations at a single gauging site, while a spatially distributed comparison was conducted between simulated SM and ET and satellite-based SM and ET. The IMD dataset consistently shows superior performance for discharge simulation at both daily and monthly scales, with KGE values of 0.85 and 0.91, respectively. Among SPPs, MSWEP and CHIRPS excel in simulating daily and monthly discharge, respectively. For ET simulation, CHIRPS outperforms IMD and other SPPs, achieving an overall KGE value of 0.37. In contrast, PERSIANN is the most effective for simulating SM compared to other precipitation products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信