Jonathan Zweigle*, Fabian Simon*, Björn Meermann and Christian Zwiener,
{"title":"定性非目标数据能否表明存在 PFAS 污染?环境样本中与 EOF 相关性的初步证据","authors":"Jonathan Zweigle*, Fabian Simon*, Björn Meermann and Christian Zwiener, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.estlett.4c0044210.1021/acs.estlett.4c00442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We correlated nontarget screening (NTS) features and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) data for PFAS analysis in environmental samples. Soils, sediments, and ashes from different locations (Germany, France, and Lithuania) (<i>n</i> = 34) were analyzed via liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and high-resolution continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry. NTS feature prioritization based on mass to carbon (<i>m</i>/C) and mass defect to carbon (MD/C) ratios was applied to discriminate potential PFAS features from common co-extracted organic matrix. Our results show a high correlation between quantitative EOF and the prioritized feature number (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.87; <i>r</i><sub>Pearson</sub> = 0.93) and the total peak area of prioritized features (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97; <i>r</i><sub>Pearson</sub> = 0.98), while commonly applied MD ranges for filtering showed much weaker correlation with EOF. The observed correlations in PFAS-contaminated samples highlight that MD/C–<i>m</i>/C prioritization is associated with a good indication of the overall PFAS burden as evidenced by EOF. Also, semiquantitative data can be extracted as shown by EOF versus prioritized peak areas. The correlations indicate that weakly fluorinated compounds were negligible and that the EOF was mostly composed of highly fluorinated substances. Our method features the potential to automatically screen large NTS data sets for potential PFAS, determine the contribution of PFAS to EOF, and provide preliminary estimates of the overall PFAS burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":37,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","volume":"11 9","pages":"996–1001 996–1001"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Qualitative Nontarget Data Be Indicative of PFAS Contamination? First Evidence by Correlation with EOF in Environmental Samples\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Zweigle*, Fabian Simon*, Björn Meermann and Christian Zwiener, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.estlett.4c0044210.1021/acs.estlett.4c00442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >We correlated nontarget screening (NTS) features and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) data for PFAS analysis in environmental samples. Soils, sediments, and ashes from different locations (Germany, France, and Lithuania) (<i>n</i> = 34) were analyzed via liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and high-resolution continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry. NTS feature prioritization based on mass to carbon (<i>m</i>/C) and mass defect to carbon (MD/C) ratios was applied to discriminate potential PFAS features from common co-extracted organic matrix. Our results show a high correlation between quantitative EOF and the prioritized feature number (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.87; <i>r</i><sub>Pearson</sub> = 0.93) and the total peak area of prioritized features (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97; <i>r</i><sub>Pearson</sub> = 0.98), while commonly applied MD ranges for filtering showed much weaker correlation with EOF. The observed correlations in PFAS-contaminated samples highlight that MD/C–<i>m</i>/C prioritization is associated with a good indication of the overall PFAS burden as evidenced by EOF. Also, semiquantitative data can be extracted as shown by EOF versus prioritized peak areas. The correlations indicate that weakly fluorinated compounds were negligible and that the EOF was mostly composed of highly fluorinated substances. Our method features the potential to automatically screen large NTS data sets for potential PFAS, determine the contribution of PFAS to EOF, and provide preliminary estimates of the overall PFAS burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.\",\"volume\":\"11 9\",\"pages\":\"996–1001 996–1001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can Qualitative Nontarget Data Be Indicative of PFAS Contamination? First Evidence by Correlation with EOF in Environmental Samples
We correlated nontarget screening (NTS) features and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) data for PFAS analysis in environmental samples. Soils, sediments, and ashes from different locations (Germany, France, and Lithuania) (n = 34) were analyzed via liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and high-resolution continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry. NTS feature prioritization based on mass to carbon (m/C) and mass defect to carbon (MD/C) ratios was applied to discriminate potential PFAS features from common co-extracted organic matrix. Our results show a high correlation between quantitative EOF and the prioritized feature number (R2 = 0.87; rPearson = 0.93) and the total peak area of prioritized features (R2 = 0.97; rPearson = 0.98), while commonly applied MD ranges for filtering showed much weaker correlation with EOF. The observed correlations in PFAS-contaminated samples highlight that MD/C–m/C prioritization is associated with a good indication of the overall PFAS burden as evidenced by EOF. Also, semiquantitative data can be extracted as shown by EOF versus prioritized peak areas. The correlations indicate that weakly fluorinated compounds were negligible and that the EOF was mostly composed of highly fluorinated substances. Our method features the potential to automatically screen large NTS data sets for potential PFAS, determine the contribution of PFAS to EOF, and provide preliminary estimates of the overall PFAS burden.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology Letters serves as an international forum for brief communications on experimental or theoretical results of exceptional timeliness in all aspects of environmental science, both pure and applied. Published as soon as accepted, these communications are summarized in monthly issues. Additionally, the journal features short reviews on emerging topics in environmental science and technology.