定性非目标数据能否表明存在 PFAS 污染?环境样本中与 EOF 相关性的初步证据

IF 8.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jonathan Zweigle*, Fabian Simon*, Björn Meermann and Christian Zwiener, 
{"title":"定性非目标数据能否表明存在 PFAS 污染?环境样本中与 EOF 相关性的初步证据","authors":"Jonathan Zweigle*,&nbsp;Fabian Simon*,&nbsp;Björn Meermann and Christian Zwiener,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.estlett.4c0044210.1021/acs.estlett.4c00442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We correlated nontarget screening (NTS) features and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) data for PFAS analysis in environmental samples. Soils, sediments, and ashes from different locations (Germany, France, and Lithuania) (<i>n</i> = 34) were analyzed via liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and high-resolution continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry. NTS feature prioritization based on mass to carbon (<i>m</i>/C) and mass defect to carbon (MD/C) ratios was applied to discriminate potential PFAS features from common co-extracted organic matrix. Our results show a high correlation between quantitative EOF and the prioritized feature number (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.87; <i>r</i><sub>Pearson</sub> = 0.93) and the total peak area of prioritized features (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97; <i>r</i><sub>Pearson</sub> = 0.98), while commonly applied MD ranges for filtering showed much weaker correlation with EOF. The observed correlations in PFAS-contaminated samples highlight that MD/C–<i>m</i>/C prioritization is associated with a good indication of the overall PFAS burden as evidenced by EOF. Also, semiquantitative data can be extracted as shown by EOF versus prioritized peak areas. The correlations indicate that weakly fluorinated compounds were negligible and that the EOF was mostly composed of highly fluorinated substances. Our method features the potential to automatically screen large NTS data sets for potential PFAS, determine the contribution of PFAS to EOF, and provide preliminary estimates of the overall PFAS burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":37,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","volume":"11 9","pages":"996–1001 996–1001"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Qualitative Nontarget Data Be Indicative of PFAS Contamination? First Evidence by Correlation with EOF in Environmental Samples\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Zweigle*,&nbsp;Fabian Simon*,&nbsp;Björn Meermann and Christian Zwiener,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.estlett.4c0044210.1021/acs.estlett.4c00442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >We correlated nontarget screening (NTS) features and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) data for PFAS analysis in environmental samples. Soils, sediments, and ashes from different locations (Germany, France, and Lithuania) (<i>n</i> = 34) were analyzed via liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and high-resolution continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry. NTS feature prioritization based on mass to carbon (<i>m</i>/C) and mass defect to carbon (MD/C) ratios was applied to discriminate potential PFAS features from common co-extracted organic matrix. Our results show a high correlation between quantitative EOF and the prioritized feature number (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.87; <i>r</i><sub>Pearson</sub> = 0.93) and the total peak area of prioritized features (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97; <i>r</i><sub>Pearson</sub> = 0.98), while commonly applied MD ranges for filtering showed much weaker correlation with EOF. The observed correlations in PFAS-contaminated samples highlight that MD/C–<i>m</i>/C prioritization is associated with a good indication of the overall PFAS burden as evidenced by EOF. Also, semiquantitative data can be extracted as shown by EOF versus prioritized peak areas. The correlations indicate that weakly fluorinated compounds were negligible and that the EOF was mostly composed of highly fluorinated substances. Our method features the potential to automatically screen large NTS data sets for potential PFAS, determine the contribution of PFAS to EOF, and provide preliminary estimates of the overall PFAS burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.\",\"volume\":\"11 9\",\"pages\":\"996–1001 996–1001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将非目标筛选(NTS)特征和可萃取有机氟(EOF)数据关联起来,用于分析环境样本中的全氟辛烷磺酸。我们通过液相色谱-高分辨率质谱法和高分辨率连续光源-石墨炉分子吸收光谱法分析了不同地点(德国、法国和立陶宛)的土壤、沉积物和灰烬(n = 34)。根据质量与碳(m/C)和质量缺陷与碳(MD/C)的比率对 NTS 特征进行了优先排序,以从常见的共萃取有机基质中分辨出潜在的 PFAS 特征。我们的结果表明,定量 EOF 与优先特征数(R2 = 0.87;rPearson = 0.93)和优先特征的总峰面积(R2 = 0.97;rPearson = 0.98)之间具有很高的相关性,而用于过滤的常用 MD 范围与 EOF 的相关性要弱得多。在受 PFAS 污染的样本中观察到的相关性突出表明,MD/C-m/C 优先级与 EOF 所显示的 PFAS 总体负担的良好指示相关。此外,如 EOF 与优先峰面积所示,还可提取半定量数据。相关性表明,弱氟化合物微不足道,而 EOF 主要由高氟物质组成。我们的方法具有自动筛选大型 NTS 数据集中潜在的全氟辛烷磺酸、确定全氟辛烷磺酸对 EOF 的贡献以及初步估计全氟辛烷磺酸总体负担的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Can Qualitative Nontarget Data Be Indicative of PFAS Contamination? First Evidence by Correlation with EOF in Environmental Samples

Can Qualitative Nontarget Data Be Indicative of PFAS Contamination? First Evidence by Correlation with EOF in Environmental Samples

We correlated nontarget screening (NTS) features and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) data for PFAS analysis in environmental samples. Soils, sediments, and ashes from different locations (Germany, France, and Lithuania) (n = 34) were analyzed via liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and high-resolution continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry. NTS feature prioritization based on mass to carbon (m/C) and mass defect to carbon (MD/C) ratios was applied to discriminate potential PFAS features from common co-extracted organic matrix. Our results show a high correlation between quantitative EOF and the prioritized feature number (R2 = 0.87; rPearson = 0.93) and the total peak area of prioritized features (R2 = 0.97; rPearson = 0.98), while commonly applied MD ranges for filtering showed much weaker correlation with EOF. The observed correlations in PFAS-contaminated samples highlight that MD/C–m/C prioritization is associated with a good indication of the overall PFAS burden as evidenced by EOF. Also, semiquantitative data can be extracted as shown by EOF versus prioritized peak areas. The correlations indicate that weakly fluorinated compounds were negligible and that the EOF was mostly composed of highly fluorinated substances. Our method features the potential to automatically screen large NTS data sets for potential PFAS, determine the contribution of PFAS to EOF, and provide preliminary estimates of the overall PFAS burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.
Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ. ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology Letters serves as an international forum for brief communications on experimental or theoretical results of exceptional timeliness in all aspects of environmental science, both pure and applied. Published as soon as accepted, these communications are summarized in monthly issues. Additionally, the journal features short reviews on emerging topics in environmental science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信