{"title":"植物枯落物和根系碳输入量的变化改变了气候过渡区三种不同森林的土壤呼吸作用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Both plant litter and roots are major sources of soil carbon (C) pools, however, the relative contributions of these two C input pathways to soil respiration, especially in different forest types, are largely unexplored, leading to a great uncertainty in estimating soil C sinks. As part of a field experiment with five-year (2016–2020) C input manipulations in three forests all between the subtropical and warm temperate region, this study was conducted to explore the responses of soil respiration to litter addition, litter removal, and root exclusion in a coniferous forest, a broadleaved forest, and a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our results showed that litter addition enhanced soil respiration by 9.57 %, 15.5 %, and 24.5 % in the coniferous, broadleaved, and mixed forests, whereas litter removal decreased it by 4.06 % and 8.30 % in the coniferous and broadleaved forests across the five years due to the changes in soil microclimate and litter-derived C sources as well as a potential priming effect in the soil. Root exclusion reduced soil respiration in all the three forests, but its effect did not differ with that of litter removal, primarily attributing to the indistinctive deviation between these two C input pathways on soil microbial biomass. The influences of different C inputs on soil respiration varied with forest types, with interactions of root exclusion with litter manipulations occurring in the coniferous and broadleaved forests but additive effects of those in the mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our findings indicate different responses of soil respiration to plant litter and root manipulations in diverse forests, and imply that rational regulating of plant-derived C inputs can help to reduce soil C loss under climate change scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in plant litter and root carbon inputs alter soil respiration in three different forests of a climate transitional region\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Both plant litter and roots are major sources of soil carbon (C) pools, however, the relative contributions of these two C input pathways to soil respiration, especially in different forest types, are largely unexplored, leading to a great uncertainty in estimating soil C sinks. As part of a field experiment with five-year (2016–2020) C input manipulations in three forests all between the subtropical and warm temperate region, this study was conducted to explore the responses of soil respiration to litter addition, litter removal, and root exclusion in a coniferous forest, a broadleaved forest, and a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our results showed that litter addition enhanced soil respiration by 9.57 %, 15.5 %, and 24.5 % in the coniferous, broadleaved, and mixed forests, whereas litter removal decreased it by 4.06 % and 8.30 % in the coniferous and broadleaved forests across the five years due to the changes in soil microclimate and litter-derived C sources as well as a potential priming effect in the soil. Root exclusion reduced soil respiration in all the three forests, but its effect did not differ with that of litter removal, primarily attributing to the indistinctive deviation between these two C input pathways on soil microbial biomass. The influences of different C inputs on soil respiration varied with forest types, with interactions of root exclusion with litter manipulations occurring in the coniferous and broadleaved forests but additive effects of those in the mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our findings indicate different responses of soil respiration to plant litter and root manipulations in diverse forests, and imply that rational regulating of plant-derived C inputs can help to reduce soil C loss under climate change scenarios.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Changes in plant litter and root carbon inputs alter soil respiration in three different forests of a climate transitional region
Both plant litter and roots are major sources of soil carbon (C) pools, however, the relative contributions of these two C input pathways to soil respiration, especially in different forest types, are largely unexplored, leading to a great uncertainty in estimating soil C sinks. As part of a field experiment with five-year (2016–2020) C input manipulations in three forests all between the subtropical and warm temperate region, this study was conducted to explore the responses of soil respiration to litter addition, litter removal, and root exclusion in a coniferous forest, a broadleaved forest, and a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our results showed that litter addition enhanced soil respiration by 9.57 %, 15.5 %, and 24.5 % in the coniferous, broadleaved, and mixed forests, whereas litter removal decreased it by 4.06 % and 8.30 % in the coniferous and broadleaved forests across the five years due to the changes in soil microclimate and litter-derived C sources as well as a potential priming effect in the soil. Root exclusion reduced soil respiration in all the three forests, but its effect did not differ with that of litter removal, primarily attributing to the indistinctive deviation between these two C input pathways on soil microbial biomass. The influences of different C inputs on soil respiration varied with forest types, with interactions of root exclusion with litter manipulations occurring in the coniferous and broadleaved forests but additive effects of those in the mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our findings indicate different responses of soil respiration to plant litter and root manipulations in diverse forests, and imply that rational regulating of plant-derived C inputs can help to reduce soil C loss under climate change scenarios.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.