企业从专利申请中获得了什么?全球信息和通信技术产业案例

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
{"title":"企业从专利申请中获得了什么?全球信息和通信技术产业案例","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the causal relationship between patent grants and firms’ dynamics in the global Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry, as the latter is a peculiar sector of modern economies, often under the lens of antitrust authorities. We exploit matched financial accounts and patent grants in 2009–2017 by 179,660 companies in 39 countries. Preliminarily, we find that less than 2% of larger firms are responsible for 89% of the grants. We propose a quasi-experimental strategy that first controls for reverse causality and then separates the impact of IPR protection from the innovative content of inventions making use of exogenous variation at the patent offices. We find that patents have a considerable impact on market shares and the size of smaller companies (31.7% and 30.7%, respectively) in the first year after the grants, which is mainly due to IPR protection. Most of the bigger firms’ gains fade away after controlling for reverse causality and endogeneity. Notably, we never observe a direct impact on profitability for any firm size category. Eventually, we argue that IPR reform proposals should consider firms’ heterogeneity and improve IPR access for smaller companies to enhance competition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005390/pdfft?md5=6c20cf95b0b35864e642255ce4b2a8b3&pid=1-s2.0-S0040162524005390-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do firms gain from patenting? The case of the global ICT industry\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the causal relationship between patent grants and firms’ dynamics in the global Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry, as the latter is a peculiar sector of modern economies, often under the lens of antitrust authorities. We exploit matched financial accounts and patent grants in 2009–2017 by 179,660 companies in 39 countries. Preliminarily, we find that less than 2% of larger firms are responsible for 89% of the grants. We propose a quasi-experimental strategy that first controls for reverse causality and then separates the impact of IPR protection from the innovative content of inventions making use of exogenous variation at the patent offices. We find that patents have a considerable impact on market shares and the size of smaller companies (31.7% and 30.7%, respectively) in the first year after the grants, which is mainly due to IPR protection. Most of the bigger firms’ gains fade away after controlling for reverse causality and endogeneity. Notably, we never observe a direct impact on profitability for any firm size category. Eventually, we argue that IPR reform proposals should consider firms’ heterogeneity and improve IPR access for smaller companies to enhance competition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005390/pdfft?md5=6c20cf95b0b35864e642255ce4b2a8b3&pid=1-s2.0-S0040162524005390-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005390\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了专利授权与全球信息和通信技术(ICT)行业企业动态之间的因果关系,因为后者是现代经济的一个特殊部门,经常受到反垄断机构的关注。我们利用了 39 个国家 179,660 家公司 2009-2017 年的财务账目和专利授予情况。我们初步发现,不到 2% 的大型企业对 89% 的专利授权负责。我们提出了一种准实验策略,首先控制反向因果关系,然后利用专利局的外生变化将知识产权保护的影响与发明的创新内容分离开来。我们发现,专利授权后的第一年,专利对较小公司的市场份额和规模有相当大的影响(分别为 31.7% 和 30.7%),这主要归功于知识产权保护。在控制了反向因果关系和内生性之后,规模较大的公司的大部分收益都会消失。值得注意的是,我们从未观察到任何企业规模类别对盈利能力产生直接影响。最后,我们认为,知识产权改革提案应考虑企业的异质性,改善小公司的知识产权准入,以增强竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What do firms gain from patenting? The case of the global ICT industry

This study investigates the causal relationship between patent grants and firms’ dynamics in the global Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry, as the latter is a peculiar sector of modern economies, often under the lens of antitrust authorities. We exploit matched financial accounts and patent grants in 2009–2017 by 179,660 companies in 39 countries. Preliminarily, we find that less than 2% of larger firms are responsible for 89% of the grants. We propose a quasi-experimental strategy that first controls for reverse causality and then separates the impact of IPR protection from the innovative content of inventions making use of exogenous variation at the patent offices. We find that patents have a considerable impact on market shares and the size of smaller companies (31.7% and 30.7%, respectively) in the first year after the grants, which is mainly due to IPR protection. Most of the bigger firms’ gains fade away after controlling for reverse causality and endogeneity. Notably, we never observe a direct impact on profitability for any firm size category. Eventually, we argue that IPR reform proposals should consider firms’ heterogeneity and improve IPR access for smaller companies to enhance competition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信