中国 "双世界一流 "政策对高校基础学科科研产出的影响

IF 2.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
{"title":"中国 \"双世界一流 \"政策对高校基础学科科研产出的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The basic disciplines of universities prove the source of technological innovation and the key disciplines of the “double world-class” (DWC) policy in China, which play an important role in boosting basic research of universities and solving the “bottleneck” problem of science and technology in China. Now China's first round of DWC policy has ended, during which the country has provided continuous policy preference and abundant investment for basic disciplines in universities, but it still lacks empirical investigation on the impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines. Therefore, based on the panel data of 191 basic disciplines of 89 universities in China from 2013 to 2020, a difference-in-differences (DID) model is developed to explore the impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines of relevant universities. The results show that, first, the DWC policy has significantly promoted the scientific research outputs of chemistry and biology disciplines in relevant universities but has no significant impact on those of mathematics and physics disciplines. Furthermore, this promoting impact can only be observed from an absolute growth perspective, but insignificant when evaluated in the relative terms. Second, the DWC policy has promoted the scientific research outputs of chemistry and biology disciplines by encouraging universities to obtain scientific research funding support and improving the international cooperation level. Third, the promoting impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines in comprehensive universities is significantly larger than that of other types of universities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of China's “double world-class” policy on the scientific research outputs of basic disciplines in universities\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The basic disciplines of universities prove the source of technological innovation and the key disciplines of the “double world-class” (DWC) policy in China, which play an important role in boosting basic research of universities and solving the “bottleneck” problem of science and technology in China. Now China's first round of DWC policy has ended, during which the country has provided continuous policy preference and abundant investment for basic disciplines in universities, but it still lacks empirical investigation on the impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines. Therefore, based on the panel data of 191 basic disciplines of 89 universities in China from 2013 to 2020, a difference-in-differences (DID) model is developed to explore the impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines of relevant universities. The results show that, first, the DWC policy has significantly promoted the scientific research outputs of chemistry and biology disciplines in relevant universities but has no significant impact on those of mathematics and physics disciplines. Furthermore, this promoting impact can only be observed from an absolute growth perspective, but insignificant when evaluated in the relative terms. Second, the DWC policy has promoted the scientific research outputs of chemistry and biology disciplines by encouraging universities to obtain scientific research funding support and improving the international cooperation level. Third, the promoting impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines in comprehensive universities is significantly larger than that of other types of universities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035524001320\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035524001320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高校基础学科是科技创新的源头,也是我国 "双一流 "建设的重点学科,对促进高校基础研究、解决我国科技 "瓶颈 "问题具有重要作用。目前,我国第一轮 "双一流 "政策已经结束,在此期间,国家对高校基础学科给予了持续的政策倾斜和大量的投入,但对 "双一流 "政策对基础学科科研产出的影响仍缺乏实证研究。因此,本文基于2013-2020年我国89所高校191个基础学科的面板数据,建立了差分(DID)模型,探讨了DWC政策对相关高校基础学科科研产出的影响。结果表明:首先,DWC 政策显著促进了相关高校化学和生物学科的科研产出,但对数学和物理学科的科研产出没有显著影响。此外,这种促进作用只能从绝对增长的角度观察到,但从相对角度评估则不明显。其次,DWC 政策通过鼓励高校获得科研经费支持和提高国际合作水平,促进了化学和生物学科的科研产出。第三,DWC 政策对综合性大学基础学科科研产出的促进作用明显大于其他类型大学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of China's “double world-class” policy on the scientific research outputs of basic disciplines in universities

The basic disciplines of universities prove the source of technological innovation and the key disciplines of the “double world-class” (DWC) policy in China, which play an important role in boosting basic research of universities and solving the “bottleneck” problem of science and technology in China. Now China's first round of DWC policy has ended, during which the country has provided continuous policy preference and abundant investment for basic disciplines in universities, but it still lacks empirical investigation on the impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines. Therefore, based on the panel data of 191 basic disciplines of 89 universities in China from 2013 to 2020, a difference-in-differences (DID) model is developed to explore the impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines of relevant universities. The results show that, first, the DWC policy has significantly promoted the scientific research outputs of chemistry and biology disciplines in relevant universities but has no significant impact on those of mathematics and physics disciplines. Furthermore, this promoting impact can only be observed from an absolute growth perspective, but insignificant when evaluated in the relative terms. Second, the DWC policy has promoted the scientific research outputs of chemistry and biology disciplines by encouraging universities to obtain scientific research funding support and improving the international cooperation level. Third, the promoting impact of the DWC policy on the scientific research output of basic disciplines in comprehensive universities is significantly larger than that of other types of universities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信