印度老年人利用住院和门诊服务获得保健服务的经验

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mayanka Ambade , Rockli Kim , S.V. Subramanian
{"title":"印度老年人利用住院和门诊服务获得保健服务的经验","authors":"Mayanka Ambade ,&nbsp;Rockli Kim ,&nbsp;S.V. Subramanian","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patient experiences have not been documented at all India level among older adults for inpatient and outpatient services. We provide all-India and sub national estimates on six domains of patient experience, namely: waiting time, respectful treatment, clarity of explanation provided, privacy during consultation, treated by provider of choice, and cleanliness of facility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unit records of adults aged 45 years and above for their inpatient (n = 4330) or outpatient (n = 33,724) service use were assessed from the Longitudinal Ageing Survey of India (LASI), conducted in 2017-18. We identified patient experience as negative if the respondent rated it as either “Bad” or “Very Bad” on a five-point Likert scale. We computed proportion of negative experience by socio-economic status, geographic location, and type of healthcare facilities. We used binary logistic regression to estimate predictors of negative patient experience, and a three-level logistic regression model to partition the total geographic variation of patient experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Most individuals rated their experience in all six domains as “Good”. Negative experiences were higher among patients who used public facilities, specifically for waiting time and cleanliness of facility. Among inpatients, the higher-than-average negative experience was noted in the north and northwest, while among outpatients, it was higher in the northeast. The largest geographic variation in negative patient experience was attributable to the villages/CEBs for all domains in outpatient services and three domains of inpatient services, whereas states accounted for the other three inpatient domains.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Majority of older adults rated their experience of healthcare use positively, but less for public health facilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000788/pdfft?md5=8227ac0b18ce5f57c3cb8b14a412d5c0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000788-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience of health care utilization for inpatient and outpatient services among older adults in India\",\"authors\":\"Mayanka Ambade ,&nbsp;Rockli Kim ,&nbsp;S.V. Subramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patient experiences have not been documented at all India level among older adults for inpatient and outpatient services. We provide all-India and sub national estimates on six domains of patient experience, namely: waiting time, respectful treatment, clarity of explanation provided, privacy during consultation, treated by provider of choice, and cleanliness of facility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unit records of adults aged 45 years and above for their inpatient (n = 4330) or outpatient (n = 33,724) service use were assessed from the Longitudinal Ageing Survey of India (LASI), conducted in 2017-18. We identified patient experience as negative if the respondent rated it as either “Bad” or “Very Bad” on a five-point Likert scale. We computed proportion of negative experience by socio-economic status, geographic location, and type of healthcare facilities. We used binary logistic regression to estimate predictors of negative patient experience, and a three-level logistic regression model to partition the total geographic variation of patient experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Most individuals rated their experience in all six domains as “Good”. Negative experiences were higher among patients who used public facilities, specifically for waiting time and cleanliness of facility. Among inpatients, the higher-than-average negative experience was noted in the north and northwest, while among outpatients, it was higher in the northeast. The largest geographic variation in negative patient experience was attributable to the villages/CEBs for all domains in outpatient services and three domains of inpatient services, whereas states accounted for the other three inpatient domains.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Majority of older adults rated their experience of healthcare use positively, but less for public health facilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000788/pdfft?md5=8227ac0b18ce5f57c3cb8b14a412d5c0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000788-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尚未记录全印度老年人在住院和门诊服务方面的患者体验。我们就患者体验的六个方面提供了全印度和次国家一级的估计值,即:等待时间、尊重治疗、提供的解释清晰度、就诊期间的隐私、由选择的提供者治疗以及设施的清洁度。方法从 2017-18 年进行的印度老龄化纵向调查(LASI)中评估了 45 岁及以上成年人使用住院(n = 4330)或门诊(n = 33724)服务的单位记录。如果受访者在李克特五点量表中将患者体验评为 "糟糕 "或 "非常糟糕",我们就将其认定为负面体验。我们按社会经济地位、地理位置和医疗机构类型计算了负面体验的比例。我们使用二元逻辑回归法来估计患者负面体验的预测因素,并使用三级逻辑回归模型来划分患者体验的总体地域差异。在使用公共设施的患者中,负面体验较多,特别是在等候时间和设施清洁度方面。在住院病人中,北部和西北部的负面体验高于平均水平,而在门诊病人中,东北部的负面体验较高。在门诊服务的所有领域和住院服务的三个领域中,患者负面体验的最大地域差异归因于村/社区卫生中心,而在住院服务的其他三个领域中,各州的差异最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience of health care utilization for inpatient and outpatient services among older adults in India

Background

Patient experiences have not been documented at all India level among older adults for inpatient and outpatient services. We provide all-India and sub national estimates on six domains of patient experience, namely: waiting time, respectful treatment, clarity of explanation provided, privacy during consultation, treated by provider of choice, and cleanliness of facility.

Methods

Unit records of adults aged 45 years and above for their inpatient (n = 4330) or outpatient (n = 33,724) service use were assessed from the Longitudinal Ageing Survey of India (LASI), conducted in 2017-18. We identified patient experience as negative if the respondent rated it as either “Bad” or “Very Bad” on a five-point Likert scale. We computed proportion of negative experience by socio-economic status, geographic location, and type of healthcare facilities. We used binary logistic regression to estimate predictors of negative patient experience, and a three-level logistic regression model to partition the total geographic variation of patient experiences.

Findings

Most individuals rated their experience in all six domains as “Good”. Negative experiences were higher among patients who used public facilities, specifically for waiting time and cleanliness of facility. Among inpatients, the higher-than-average negative experience was noted in the north and northwest, while among outpatients, it was higher in the northeast. The largest geographic variation in negative patient experience was attributable to the villages/CEBs for all domains in outpatient services and three domains of inpatient services, whereas states accounted for the other three inpatient domains.

Interpretation

Majority of older adults rated their experience of healthcare use positively, but less for public health facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信