Jesús Privado , Miren Pérez-Eizaguirre , Marta Martínez-Rodríguez , Luis Ponce-de-León
{"title":"预测学习成绩的认知和非认知因素","authors":"Jesús Privado , Miren Pérez-Eizaguirre , Marta Martínez-Rodríguez , Luis Ponce-de-León","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Attempts have been made to predict academic performance (AP) from different factors, but in most cases it has been done with one measure or by combining two. We propose a study in which as predictors of AP we use: intelligence, estimated based on six factors (<em>Gf</em>, <em>Gc</em>, <em>Gv</em>, <em>Gs</em>, <em>Gsm</em> and <em>Gy</em>), general factor of personality, motivation (intrinsic, achievement and fear of failure), emotional intelligence, study skills, and psychopathology (anxiety, depression and stress). We evaluated 603 primary and secondary school students aged 12.88 (<em>SD</em> = 1.47), 47.6 % female. Results coming from structural equation modeling indicate that AP in primary school is explained by <em>g</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.40), <em>Gf</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.24), psychopathology (<em>β</em> = −0.17) and personality (<em>β</em> = 0.86) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0,983, NFI = 0,916, SRMR = 0,089); and in secondary school by <em>g</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.64), <em>Gs</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.29) and personality (<em>β</em> = 0.68) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0.990, NFI = 0.884, SRMR = 0.098). The results coincide with previous studies, with small discrepancies that may be due to the use of multiple predictors of AP. In conclusion, cognitive factors appear to be the best predictor of AP in primary and secondary school.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive and non-cognitive factors as predictors of academic performance\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Privado , Miren Pérez-Eizaguirre , Marta Martínez-Rodríguez , Luis Ponce-de-León\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Attempts have been made to predict academic performance (AP) from different factors, but in most cases it has been done with one measure or by combining two. We propose a study in which as predictors of AP we use: intelligence, estimated based on six factors (<em>Gf</em>, <em>Gc</em>, <em>Gv</em>, <em>Gs</em>, <em>Gsm</em> and <em>Gy</em>), general factor of personality, motivation (intrinsic, achievement and fear of failure), emotional intelligence, study skills, and psychopathology (anxiety, depression and stress). We evaluated 603 primary and secondary school students aged 12.88 (<em>SD</em> = 1.47), 47.6 % female. Results coming from structural equation modeling indicate that AP in primary school is explained by <em>g</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.40), <em>Gf</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.24), psychopathology (<em>β</em> = −0.17) and personality (<em>β</em> = 0.86) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0,983, NFI = 0,916, SRMR = 0,089); and in secondary school by <em>g</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.64), <em>Gs</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.29) and personality (<em>β</em> = 0.68) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0.990, NFI = 0.884, SRMR = 0.098). The results coincide with previous studies, with small discrepancies that may be due to the use of multiple predictors of AP. In conclusion, cognitive factors appear to be the best predictor of AP in primary and secondary school.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001298\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001298","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cognitive and non-cognitive factors as predictors of academic performance
Attempts have been made to predict academic performance (AP) from different factors, but in most cases it has been done with one measure or by combining two. We propose a study in which as predictors of AP we use: intelligence, estimated based on six factors (Gf, Gc, Gv, Gs, Gsm and Gy), general factor of personality, motivation (intrinsic, achievement and fear of failure), emotional intelligence, study skills, and psychopathology (anxiety, depression and stress). We evaluated 603 primary and secondary school students aged 12.88 (SD = 1.47), 47.6 % female. Results coming from structural equation modeling indicate that AP in primary school is explained by g (β = 0.40), Gf (β = 0.24), psychopathology (β = −0.17) and personality (β = 0.86) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0,983, NFI = 0,916, SRMR = 0,089); and in secondary school by g (β = 0.64), Gs (β = 0.29) and personality (β = 0.68) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0.990, NFI = 0.884, SRMR = 0.098). The results coincide with previous studies, with small discrepancies that may be due to the use of multiple predictors of AP. In conclusion, cognitive factors appear to be the best predictor of AP in primary and secondary school.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).