预测学习成绩的认知和非认知因素

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Jesús Privado , Miren Pérez-Eizaguirre , Marta Martínez-Rodríguez , Luis Ponce-de-León
{"title":"预测学习成绩的认知和非认知因素","authors":"Jesús Privado ,&nbsp;Miren Pérez-Eizaguirre ,&nbsp;Marta Martínez-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Luis Ponce-de-León","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Attempts have been made to predict academic performance (AP) from different factors, but in most cases it has been done with one measure or by combining two. We propose a study in which as predictors of AP we use: intelligence, estimated based on six factors (<em>Gf</em>, <em>Gc</em>, <em>Gv</em>, <em>Gs</em>, <em>Gsm</em> and <em>Gy</em>), general factor of personality, motivation (intrinsic, achievement and fear of failure), emotional intelligence, study skills, and psychopathology (anxiety, depression and stress). We evaluated 603 primary and secondary school students aged 12.88 (<em>SD</em> = 1.47), 47.6 % female. Results coming from structural equation modeling indicate that AP in primary school is explained by <em>g</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.40), <em>Gf</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.24), psychopathology (<em>β</em> = −0.17) and personality (<em>β</em> = 0.86) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0,983, NFI = 0,916, SRMR = 0,089); and in secondary school by <em>g</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.64), <em>Gs</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.29) and personality (<em>β</em> = 0.68) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0.990, NFI = 0.884, SRMR = 0.098). The results coincide with previous studies, with small discrepancies that may be due to the use of multiple predictors of AP. In conclusion, cognitive factors appear to be the best predictor of AP in primary and secondary school.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive and non-cognitive factors as predictors of academic performance\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Privado ,&nbsp;Miren Pérez-Eizaguirre ,&nbsp;Marta Martínez-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Luis Ponce-de-León\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Attempts have been made to predict academic performance (AP) from different factors, but in most cases it has been done with one measure or by combining two. We propose a study in which as predictors of AP we use: intelligence, estimated based on six factors (<em>Gf</em>, <em>Gc</em>, <em>Gv</em>, <em>Gs</em>, <em>Gsm</em> and <em>Gy</em>), general factor of personality, motivation (intrinsic, achievement and fear of failure), emotional intelligence, study skills, and psychopathology (anxiety, depression and stress). We evaluated 603 primary and secondary school students aged 12.88 (<em>SD</em> = 1.47), 47.6 % female. Results coming from structural equation modeling indicate that AP in primary school is explained by <em>g</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.40), <em>Gf</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.24), psychopathology (<em>β</em> = −0.17) and personality (<em>β</em> = 0.86) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0,983, NFI = 0,916, SRMR = 0,089); and in secondary school by <em>g</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.64), <em>Gs</em> (<em>β</em> = 0.29) and personality (<em>β</em> = 0.68) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0.990, NFI = 0.884, SRMR = 0.098). The results coincide with previous studies, with small discrepancies that may be due to the use of multiple predictors of AP. In conclusion, cognitive factors appear to be the best predictor of AP in primary and secondary school.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001298\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001298","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经有人尝试用不同的因素来预测学习成绩(AP),但大多数情况下都是用一种测量方法或将两种测量方法结合起来。我们提出了一项研究,使用以下因素作为学业成绩的预测因子:智力(根据六个因子(Gf、Gc、Gv、Gs、Gsm 和 Gy)估算)、一般人格因子、动机(内在动机、成就动机和对失败的恐惧)、情商、学习技能和心理病理学(焦虑、抑郁和压力)。我们对 603 名中小学生进行了评估,他们的年龄为 12.88 岁(SD = 1.47),47.6% 为女性。结构方程模型的结果表明,小学学业成绩由 g(β = 0.40)、Gf(β = 0.24)、心理病理学(β = -0.17)和人格(β = 0.86)(拟合优度:GFI = 0,983,NFI = 0,916,SRR = 0,089);在中学阶段,g(β = 0.64)、Gs(β = 0.29)和人格(β = 0.68)(拟合优度:GFI = 0.990,NFI = 0.884,SRR = 0.098)。结果与之前的研究相吻合,差异较小,可能是由于使用了多个 AP 预测因子。总之,认知因素似乎是预测中小学学习成绩的最佳指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive and non-cognitive factors as predictors of academic performance

Attempts have been made to predict academic performance (AP) from different factors, but in most cases it has been done with one measure or by combining two. We propose a study in which as predictors of AP we use: intelligence, estimated based on six factors (Gf, Gc, Gv, Gs, Gsm and Gy), general factor of personality, motivation (intrinsic, achievement and fear of failure), emotional intelligence, study skills, and psychopathology (anxiety, depression and stress). We evaluated 603 primary and secondary school students aged 12.88 (SD = 1.47), 47.6 % female. Results coming from structural equation modeling indicate that AP in primary school is explained by g (β = 0.40), Gf (β = 0.24), psychopathology (β = −0.17) and personality (β = 0.86) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0,983, NFI = 0,916, SRMR = 0,089); and in secondary school by g (β = 0.64), Gs (β = 0.29) and personality (β = 0.68) (Goodness of fit: GFI = 0.990, NFI = 0.884, SRMR = 0.098). The results coincide with previous studies, with small discrepancies that may be due to the use of multiple predictors of AP. In conclusion, cognitive factors appear to be the best predictor of AP in primary and secondary school.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信