从 COVID-19 大流行期间政府公共卫生人员的激增中汲取的经验和教训。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Katie Morrison Lee, Alyssa Bosold, Cindy Alvarez, Oluwatosin O Dada, Deborah S Porterfield
{"title":"从 COVID-19 大流行期间政府公共卫生人员的激增中汲取的经验和教训。","authors":"Katie Morrison Lee, Alyssa Bosold, Cindy Alvarez, Oluwatosin O Dada, Deborah S Porterfield","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States relied on the public health workforce to control the spread of COVID-19 while continuing to provide foundational public health services. Facing longstanding staffing shortages, state, tribal, local, and territorial (STLT) public health agencies (PHAs) used various strategies and supports to surge the workforce in response to the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study explored (1) the types of strategies and supports STLT PHAs used to surge the public health workforce during the pandemic, (2) assessments of surge strategies and supports, and (3) approaches to using the range of surge strategies available.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted 27 semi-structured interviews in 2023 and performed thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Interviewees included STLT public health officials, leaders of organizations that directly supported the COVID-19 workforce surge, and public health workforce experts indirectly involved in the workforce surge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To surge the workforce, interviewees relied on partnerships, staffing agencies, the National Guard, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation's COVID-19 Corps, the Medical Reserve Corps, and other strategies. Interviewees valued strategies that rapidly engaged staff and volunteers at no cost to their PHA and flexible funding from the federal government to support surge efforts but noted shortcomings in the strategies and supports available. Interviewees described using multiple strategies simultaneously but noted challenges in implementing these strategies due to inadequate planning and insufficient staff and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the need for STLT PHAs to establish mechanisms to surge the workforce as part of ongoing planning for emergency preparedness. Focus areas include building administrative and hiring capacity within STLT PHAs and sustaining partnerships and contractual agreements that helped fill staffing gaps during the pandemic. To support efforts to build workforce capacity to meet future surge management needs, STLT PHAs should consider creative solutions to attract and retain staff, as well as opportunities to engage students in public health work.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"283-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and Lessons Learned From Surging the Governmental Public Health Workforce During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Katie Morrison Lee, Alyssa Bosold, Cindy Alvarez, Oluwatosin O Dada, Deborah S Porterfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States relied on the public health workforce to control the spread of COVID-19 while continuing to provide foundational public health services. Facing longstanding staffing shortages, state, tribal, local, and territorial (STLT) public health agencies (PHAs) used various strategies and supports to surge the workforce in response to the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study explored (1) the types of strategies and supports STLT PHAs used to surge the public health workforce during the pandemic, (2) assessments of surge strategies and supports, and (3) approaches to using the range of surge strategies available.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted 27 semi-structured interviews in 2023 and performed thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Interviewees included STLT public health officials, leaders of organizations that directly supported the COVID-19 workforce surge, and public health workforce experts indirectly involved in the workforce surge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To surge the workforce, interviewees relied on partnerships, staffing agencies, the National Guard, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation's COVID-19 Corps, the Medical Reserve Corps, and other strategies. Interviewees valued strategies that rapidly engaged staff and volunteers at no cost to their PHA and flexible funding from the federal government to support surge efforts but noted shortcomings in the strategies and supports available. Interviewees described using multiple strategies simultaneously but noted challenges in implementing these strategies due to inadequate planning and insufficient staff and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the need for STLT PHAs to establish mechanisms to surge the workforce as part of ongoing planning for emergency preparedness. Focus areas include building administrative and hiring capacity within STLT PHAs and sustaining partnerships and contractual agreements that helped fill staffing gaps during the pandemic. To support efforts to build workforce capacity to meet future surge management needs, STLT PHAs should consider creative solutions to attract and retain staff, as well as opportunities to engage students in public health work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"283-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,美国依靠公共卫生人员控制 COVID-19 的传播,同时继续提供基本的公共卫生服务。面对长期存在的人员短缺问题,州、部落、地方和地区(STLT)公共卫生机构(PHAs)采用了各种策略和支持措施来扩充劳动力,以应对大流行病:本研究探讨了:(1)STLT 公共卫生机构在大流行期间用于增援公共卫生人员的策略和支持类型;(2)对增援策略和支持的评估;以及(3)使用一系列增援策略的方法:我们在 2023 年进行了 27 次半结构式访谈,并进行了主题分析:受访者包括 STLT 公共卫生官员、直接支持 COVID-19 人员激增的组织领导以及间接参与人员激增的公共卫生人员专家:受访者依靠合作伙伴关系、人员配置机构、国民警卫队、疾病控制与预防中心基金会的 COVID-19 部队、医疗后备队及其他策略来实现人员激增。受访者重视那些能让工作人员和志愿者快速参与进来,且不需要公共卫生机构承担任何费用的战略,以及联邦政府为支持增援工作而提供的灵活资金,但也指出了现有战略和支持的不足之处。受访者描述了同时使用多种策略的情况,但指出由于规划不足、人员和资源不足,在实施这些策略时面临挑战:本研究强调了 STLT 公共卫生服务机构有必要建立机制,作为持续规划应急准备工作的一部分,实现劳动力的激增。重点领域包括在 STLT PHA 内部建立行政和招聘能力,以及维持合作伙伴关系和合同协议,以帮助填补大流行期间的人员缺口。为支持劳动力能力建设以满足未来激增的管理需求,STLT 公共卫生机构应考虑创造性的解决方案,以吸引和留住员工,并提供机会让学生参与公共卫生工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences and Lessons Learned From Surging the Governmental Public Health Workforce During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Context: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States relied on the public health workforce to control the spread of COVID-19 while continuing to provide foundational public health services. Facing longstanding staffing shortages, state, tribal, local, and territorial (STLT) public health agencies (PHAs) used various strategies and supports to surge the workforce in response to the pandemic.

Objectives: The study explored (1) the types of strategies and supports STLT PHAs used to surge the public health workforce during the pandemic, (2) assessments of surge strategies and supports, and (3) approaches to using the range of surge strategies available.

Design: We conducted 27 semi-structured interviews in 2023 and performed thematic analysis.

Participants: Interviewees included STLT public health officials, leaders of organizations that directly supported the COVID-19 workforce surge, and public health workforce experts indirectly involved in the workforce surge.

Results: To surge the workforce, interviewees relied on partnerships, staffing agencies, the National Guard, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation's COVID-19 Corps, the Medical Reserve Corps, and other strategies. Interviewees valued strategies that rapidly engaged staff and volunteers at no cost to their PHA and flexible funding from the federal government to support surge efforts but noted shortcomings in the strategies and supports available. Interviewees described using multiple strategies simultaneously but noted challenges in implementing these strategies due to inadequate planning and insufficient staff and resources.

Conclusion: The study underscores the need for STLT PHAs to establish mechanisms to surge the workforce as part of ongoing planning for emergency preparedness. Focus areas include building administrative and hiring capacity within STLT PHAs and sustaining partnerships and contractual agreements that helped fill staffing gaps during the pandemic. To support efforts to build workforce capacity to meet future surge management needs, STLT PHAs should consider creative solutions to attract and retain staff, as well as opportunities to engage students in public health work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信