{"title":"连续照射 115 瓦 6.78 兆赫单极射频疗法后五个美容单元面部提升效果的三维对比分析。","authors":"JongSeo Kim","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern aesthetic trends favor noninvasive facelift procedures, shifting away from traditional surgery. This study explores the three-dimensional evaluation of facial lifting across aesthetic units using the VolNewMer (VNM) device after continuous 115-W 6.78-MHz monopolar radiofrequency (RF) therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 30 Korean women underwent VNM treatment with a detailed protocol, including energy levels, cooling techniques, and stem cell media application. Lifting amount was analyzed using a three-dimensional scanner with computer program in five specific areas, including the forehead, lateral orbital rim, mid-face, low-face, and neck areas. The changes in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for skin texture, tightening, and lifting were surveyed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immediate and sustained improvement was observed in the mid-cheeks and lower face area. The lifting amount of facial mid-cheek areas was 1.88 ± 0.76 mm, whereas the lifting amount of lower face areas was 1.79 ± 0.91, lateral orbital rim areas was 1.62 ± 0.99, forehead areas was 1.46 ± 1.26, and neck areas was 2.66 ± 1.40 mm immediately after the procedure. The lifting amount of mid-cheek areas was 1.93 ± 0.90 mm, whereas lower face areas was 1.67 ± 1.04, lateral orbital rim areas was 1.58 ± .072, forehead areas was 1.31 ± 0.73, and neck areas was 2.80 ± 0.78 mm 1 month after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RF treatment is emerging as a recommended noninvasive procedure for facial lifting. VNM-RF treatment showed a significant lifting effect immediately after the procedure, and the lifting effect continued 1 month later (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale skin texture was more satisfying 1 month later than immediately after, suggesting a potential correlation with collagen regeneration, indicating a lasting effect over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Three-dimensional Analysis of Facial Lifting Effects across Five Aesthetic Units following Continuous Radiation 115-Watt 6.78-MHz Monopolar Radiofrequency Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"JongSeo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern aesthetic trends favor noninvasive facelift procedures, shifting away from traditional surgery. This study explores the three-dimensional evaluation of facial lifting across aesthetic units using the VolNewMer (VNM) device after continuous 115-W 6.78-MHz monopolar radiofrequency (RF) therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 30 Korean women underwent VNM treatment with a detailed protocol, including energy levels, cooling techniques, and stem cell media application. Lifting amount was analyzed using a three-dimensional scanner with computer program in five specific areas, including the forehead, lateral orbital rim, mid-face, low-face, and neck areas. The changes in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for skin texture, tightening, and lifting were surveyed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immediate and sustained improvement was observed in the mid-cheeks and lower face area. The lifting amount of facial mid-cheek areas was 1.88 ± 0.76 mm, whereas the lifting amount of lower face areas was 1.79 ± 0.91, lateral orbital rim areas was 1.62 ± 0.99, forehead areas was 1.46 ± 1.26, and neck areas was 2.66 ± 1.40 mm immediately after the procedure. The lifting amount of mid-cheek areas was 1.93 ± 0.90 mm, whereas lower face areas was 1.67 ± 1.04, lateral orbital rim areas was 1.58 ± .072, forehead areas was 1.31 ± 0.73, and neck areas was 2.80 ± 0.78 mm 1 month after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RF treatment is emerging as a recommended noninvasive procedure for facial lifting. VNM-RF treatment showed a significant lifting effect immediately after the procedure, and the lifting effect continued 1 month later (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale skin texture was more satisfying 1 month later than immediately after, suggesting a potential correlation with collagen regeneration, indicating a lasting effect over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379479/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Three-dimensional Analysis of Facial Lifting Effects across Five Aesthetic Units following Continuous Radiation 115-Watt 6.78-MHz Monopolar Radiofrequency Therapy.
Background: Modern aesthetic trends favor noninvasive facelift procedures, shifting away from traditional surgery. This study explores the three-dimensional evaluation of facial lifting across aesthetic units using the VolNewMer (VNM) device after continuous 115-W 6.78-MHz monopolar radiofrequency (RF) therapy.
Methods: A cohort of 30 Korean women underwent VNM treatment with a detailed protocol, including energy levels, cooling techniques, and stem cell media application. Lifting amount was analyzed using a three-dimensional scanner with computer program in five specific areas, including the forehead, lateral orbital rim, mid-face, low-face, and neck areas. The changes in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for skin texture, tightening, and lifting were surveyed.
Results: Immediate and sustained improvement was observed in the mid-cheeks and lower face area. The lifting amount of facial mid-cheek areas was 1.88 ± 0.76 mm, whereas the lifting amount of lower face areas was 1.79 ± 0.91, lateral orbital rim areas was 1.62 ± 0.99, forehead areas was 1.46 ± 1.26, and neck areas was 2.66 ± 1.40 mm immediately after the procedure. The lifting amount of mid-cheek areas was 1.93 ± 0.90 mm, whereas lower face areas was 1.67 ± 1.04, lateral orbital rim areas was 1.58 ± .072, forehead areas was 1.31 ± 0.73, and neck areas was 2.80 ± 0.78 mm 1 month after the procedure.
Conclusions: RF treatment is emerging as a recommended noninvasive procedure for facial lifting. VNM-RF treatment showed a significant lifting effect immediately after the procedure, and the lifting effect continued 1 month later (P < 0.05). Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale skin texture was more satisfying 1 month later than immediately after, suggesting a potential correlation with collagen regeneration, indicating a lasting effect over time.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.