在工作记忆任务中,预期干扰因素的强度会影响脑电图的阿尔法和θ振荡。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
{"title":"在工作记忆任务中,预期干扰因素的强度会影响脑电图的阿尔法和θ振荡。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Working Memory (WM) requires maintenance of task-relevant information and suppression of task-irrelevant/distracting information. Alpha and theta oscillations have been extensively investigated in relation to WM. However, studies that examine both theta and alpha bands in relation to distractors, encompassing not only power modulation but also connectivity modulation, remain scarce. Here, we depicted, at the EEG-source level, the increase in power and connectivity in theta and alpha bands induced by strong relative to weak distractors during a visual Sternberg-like WM task involving the encoding of verbal items. During retention, a strong or weak distractor was presented, predictable in time and nature. Analysis focused on the encoding and retention phases before distractor presentation. Theta and alpha power were computed in cortical regions of interest, and connectivity networks estimated via spectral Granger causality and synthetized using in/out degree indices. The following modulations were observed for strong vs. weak distractors. In theta band during encoding, the power in frontal regions increased, together with frontal-to-frontal and bottom-up occipital-to-temporal-to-frontal connectivity; even during retention, bottom-up theta connectivity increased. In alpha band during retention, but not during encoding, the power in temporal-occipital regions increased, together with top-down frontal-to-occipital and temporal-to-occipital connectivity. From our results, we postulate a proactive cooperation between theta and alpha mechanisms: the first would mediate enhancement of target representation both during encoding and retention, and the second would mediate increased inhibition of sensory areas during retention only, to suppress the processing of imminent distractor without interfering with the processing of ongoing target stimulus during encoding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381192400332X/pdfft?md5=03fac5ee5a078d78b3f301023c1f4ed7&pid=1-s2.0-S105381192400332X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The strength of anticipated distractors shapes EEG alpha and theta oscillations in a Working Memory task\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Working Memory (WM) requires maintenance of task-relevant information and suppression of task-irrelevant/distracting information. Alpha and theta oscillations have been extensively investigated in relation to WM. However, studies that examine both theta and alpha bands in relation to distractors, encompassing not only power modulation but also connectivity modulation, remain scarce. Here, we depicted, at the EEG-source level, the increase in power and connectivity in theta and alpha bands induced by strong relative to weak distractors during a visual Sternberg-like WM task involving the encoding of verbal items. During retention, a strong or weak distractor was presented, predictable in time and nature. Analysis focused on the encoding and retention phases before distractor presentation. Theta and alpha power were computed in cortical regions of interest, and connectivity networks estimated via spectral Granger causality and synthetized using in/out degree indices. The following modulations were observed for strong vs. weak distractors. In theta band during encoding, the power in frontal regions increased, together with frontal-to-frontal and bottom-up occipital-to-temporal-to-frontal connectivity; even during retention, bottom-up theta connectivity increased. In alpha band during retention, but not during encoding, the power in temporal-occipital regions increased, together with top-down frontal-to-occipital and temporal-to-occipital connectivity. From our results, we postulate a proactive cooperation between theta and alpha mechanisms: the first would mediate enhancement of target representation both during encoding and retention, and the second would mediate increased inhibition of sensory areas during retention only, to suppress the processing of imminent distractor without interfering with the processing of ongoing target stimulus during encoding.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroImage\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381192400332X/pdfft?md5=03fac5ee5a078d78b3f301023c1f4ed7&pid=1-s2.0-S105381192400332X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroImage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381192400332X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381192400332X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作记忆(WM)要求保持与任务相关的信息,并抑制与任务无关/分散注意力的信息。阿尔法和θ振荡已被广泛研究与工作记忆有关。然而,同时研究θ和α波段与分心者的关系,不仅包括功率调制,还包括连接性调制的研究仍然很少。在这里,我们在脑电图源水平上描绘了在一项涉及言语项目编码的视觉斯特恩伯格式 WM 任务中,强分心源相对于弱分心源引起的θ和α波段的功率和连通性的增加。在保留过程中,会出现一个强或弱的干扰项,其时间和性质均可预测。分析主要集中在分心物出现前的编码和保持阶段。在感兴趣的皮层区域计算θ和α功率,通过频谱格兰杰因果关系估算连接网络,并使用进出度指数进行合成。在强干扰物和弱干扰物之间观察到以下调节。在编码期间的θ波段,额叶区域的功率增加,额叶到额叶以及枕叶到颞叶到额叶的自下而上的连通性也增加了;即使在保留期间,自下而上的θ连通性也增加了。在α波段,保留期间颞枕区的功率增加,同时额叶到枕叶和颞叶到枕叶的连通性也自上而下地增加。根据我们的研究结果,我们推测θ和α机制之间存在一种积极的合作关系:前者会在编码和保留过程中介导目标表征的增强,而后者则只在保留过程中介导感觉区域抑制的增强,以抑制对即将出现的干扰物的处理,同时又不干扰编码过程中对正在进行的目标刺激的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The strength of anticipated distractors shapes EEG alpha and theta oscillations in a Working Memory task

Working Memory (WM) requires maintenance of task-relevant information and suppression of task-irrelevant/distracting information. Alpha and theta oscillations have been extensively investigated in relation to WM. However, studies that examine both theta and alpha bands in relation to distractors, encompassing not only power modulation but also connectivity modulation, remain scarce. Here, we depicted, at the EEG-source level, the increase in power and connectivity in theta and alpha bands induced by strong relative to weak distractors during a visual Sternberg-like WM task involving the encoding of verbal items. During retention, a strong or weak distractor was presented, predictable in time and nature. Analysis focused on the encoding and retention phases before distractor presentation. Theta and alpha power were computed in cortical regions of interest, and connectivity networks estimated via spectral Granger causality and synthetized using in/out degree indices. The following modulations were observed for strong vs. weak distractors. In theta band during encoding, the power in frontal regions increased, together with frontal-to-frontal and bottom-up occipital-to-temporal-to-frontal connectivity; even during retention, bottom-up theta connectivity increased. In alpha band during retention, but not during encoding, the power in temporal-occipital regions increased, together with top-down frontal-to-occipital and temporal-to-occipital connectivity. From our results, we postulate a proactive cooperation between theta and alpha mechanisms: the first would mediate enhancement of target representation both during encoding and retention, and the second would mediate increased inhibition of sensory areas during retention only, to suppress the processing of imminent distractor without interfering with the processing of ongoing target stimulus during encoding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信