慢性肾病患者的非泵与泵上冠状动脉旁路移植术:最新系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Muhammad Ahmed, Kanwal Majeed, Hassam Ali, Hina Syed, Atiya Batool
{"title":"慢性肾病患者的非泵与泵上冠状动脉旁路移植术:最新系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Muhammad Ahmed, Kanwal Majeed, Hassam Ali, Hina Syed, Atiya Batool","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04198-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular disease is found to be the primary cause of mortality, and after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), their prognosis deteriorates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis comparing off-pump CABG versus on-pump CABG in CKD patients. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, using relevant keywords. We included studies comparing off-pump CABG with on-pump CABG in patients with chronic kidney disease, which was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Effect estimates were synthesized using a random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our primary outcome was short-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 studies, of which 23 were observational and 2 were RCTs, were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 234,585 patients (66,591 in the off-pump group and 167,994 in the on-pump group). Our meta-analysis showed that there was a significantly higher mortality rate in the on-pump CABG group as compared to the off-pump CABG group (RR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]; P = 0.0006, I<sup>2</sup> = 60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with OPCAB, short-term mortality was significantly higher in ONCAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ahmed, Kanwal Majeed, Hassam Ali, Hina Syed, Atiya Batool\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11255-024-04198-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular disease is found to be the primary cause of mortality, and after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), their prognosis deteriorates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis comparing off-pump CABG versus on-pump CABG in CKD patients. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, using relevant keywords. We included studies comparing off-pump CABG with on-pump CABG in patients with chronic kidney disease, which was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Effect estimates were synthesized using a random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our primary outcome was short-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 studies, of which 23 were observational and 2 were RCTs, were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 234,585 patients (66,591 in the off-pump group and 167,994 in the on-pump group). Our meta-analysis showed that there was a significantly higher mortality rate in the on-pump CABG group as compared to the off-pump CABG group (RR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]; P = 0.0006, I<sup>2</sup> = 60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with OPCAB, short-term mortality was significantly higher in ONCAB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04198-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04198-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中,心血管疾病是死亡的主要原因,而在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后,他们的预后会恶化:我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了在 CKD 患者中进行非泵 CABG 与泵上 CABG 的效果。我们使用相关关键词检索了电子数据库,包括 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Google Scholar。我们纳入了对慢性肾脏病患者(定义为估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)2)进行非泵 CABG 与泵上 CABG 比较的研究。采用随机效应模型对效应估计值进行综合,二分法结果用风险比(RR)表示,连续法结果用平均差(MD)表示,并附有相应的 95% 置信区间(CI)。我们的主要结果是短期死亡率:本次荟萃分析共纳入了 25 项研究,其中 23 项为观察性研究,2 项为 RCT 研究,包括 234,585 名患者(非泵组 66,591 人,泵上组 167,994 人)。我们的荟萃分析表明,与非泵 CABG 组相比,泵上 CABG 组的死亡率明显更高(RR:0.73,95% CI [0.61,0.88];P = 0.0006,I2 = 60%):结论:与 OPCAB 相比,ONCAB 的短期死亡率明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular disease is found to be the primary cause of mortality, and after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), their prognosis deteriorates.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis comparing off-pump CABG versus on-pump CABG in CKD patients. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, using relevant keywords. We included studies comparing off-pump CABG with on-pump CABG in patients with chronic kidney disease, which was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Effect estimates were synthesized using a random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our primary outcome was short-term mortality.

Results: A total of 25 studies, of which 23 were observational and 2 were RCTs, were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 234,585 patients (66,591 in the off-pump group and 167,994 in the on-pump group). Our meta-analysis showed that there was a significantly higher mortality rate in the on-pump CABG group as compared to the off-pump CABG group (RR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]; P = 0.0006, I2 = 60%).

Conclusion: Compared with OPCAB, short-term mortality was significantly higher in ONCAB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信