{"title":"硫酸考利司汀治疗耐碳青霉烯菌感染的临床有效性和安全性及影响因素分析。","authors":"Ying-Chao Ma, Ya-Qing Sun, Xia Wu, Yong-Jing Wang, Xiu-Ling Yang, Jian-Jun Gu","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S473200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate in treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) and to analyze potential factors impacting its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, medical records of CRO-infected patients from June 2020 to June 2023 were analyzed, divided into effective and ineffective treatment groups, and compared for clinical outcomes and adverse reactions. Multifactorial logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were used to identify influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 226 patients, with 124 in the effective treatment group and 102 in the ineffective group. A total of 293 CRO strains were cultured. The clinical efficacy rate of colistin sulfate was 54.87%, the microbiological efficacy rate 46.46%, and the hospital mortality rate 20.80%, with nephrotoxicity observed in 11.50% of patients. Multifactorial analysis identified APACHE II scores and vasoactive drug use as independent predictors of ineffective treatment, while treatment duration and albumin levels predicted effective treatment. ROC analysis indicated that albumin levels >34 g/L, APACHE II scores <13, and treatment duration >10 days correlated with better clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colistin sulfate is both safe and effective in clinical settings. Factors such as treatment duration, albumin levels, APACHE II scores, and vasoactive drug use independently affect its clinical efficacy, providing valuable guidance for its informed clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Colistin Sulphate in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms and Analysis of Influencing Factors.\",\"authors\":\"Ying-Chao Ma, Ya-Qing Sun, Xia Wu, Yong-Jing Wang, Xiu-Ling Yang, Jian-Jun Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IDR.S473200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate in treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) and to analyze potential factors impacting its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, medical records of CRO-infected patients from June 2020 to June 2023 were analyzed, divided into effective and ineffective treatment groups, and compared for clinical outcomes and adverse reactions. Multifactorial logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were used to identify influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 226 patients, with 124 in the effective treatment group and 102 in the ineffective group. A total of 293 CRO strains were cultured. The clinical efficacy rate of colistin sulfate was 54.87%, the microbiological efficacy rate 46.46%, and the hospital mortality rate 20.80%, with nephrotoxicity observed in 11.50% of patients. Multifactorial analysis identified APACHE II scores and vasoactive drug use as independent predictors of ineffective treatment, while treatment duration and albumin levels predicted effective treatment. ROC analysis indicated that albumin levels >34 g/L, APACHE II scores <13, and treatment duration >10 days correlated with better clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colistin sulfate is both safe and effective in clinical settings. Factors such as treatment duration, albumin levels, APACHE II scores, and vasoactive drug use independently affect its clinical efficacy, providing valuable guidance for its informed clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S473200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S473200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估硫酸考利司汀治疗耐碳青霉烯菌(CRO)感染的有效性和安全性,并分析影响其有效性的潜在因素:在这项回顾性研究中,分析了2020年6月至2023年6月期间CRO感染患者的病历,将其分为有效治疗组和无效治疗组,并比较了临床结果和不良反应。采用多因素逻辑回归和ROC曲线分析确定影响因素:研究共纳入 226 例患者,其中有效治疗组 124 例,无效治疗组 102 例。共培养出 293 株 CRO 菌株。硫酸可乐定的临床有效率为 54.87%,微生物有效率为 46.46%,住院死亡率为 20.80%,11.50% 的患者出现肾毒性。多因素分析表明,APACHE II 评分和血管活性药物的使用是治疗无效的独立预测因素,而治疗时间和白蛋白水平则是治疗有效的预测因素。ROC分析表明,白蛋白水平大于34克/升、APACHE II评分10天与更好的临床疗效相关:结论:硫酸考利司汀在临床上既安全又有效。治疗时间、白蛋白水平、APACHE II 评分和血管活性药物的使用等因素会独立影响其临床疗效,这为临床应用提供了有价值的指导。
Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Colistin Sulphate in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms and Analysis of Influencing Factors.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate in treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) and to analyze potential factors impacting its effectiveness.
Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of CRO-infected patients from June 2020 to June 2023 were analyzed, divided into effective and ineffective treatment groups, and compared for clinical outcomes and adverse reactions. Multifactorial logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were used to identify influencing factors.
Results: The study included 226 patients, with 124 in the effective treatment group and 102 in the ineffective group. A total of 293 CRO strains were cultured. The clinical efficacy rate of colistin sulfate was 54.87%, the microbiological efficacy rate 46.46%, and the hospital mortality rate 20.80%, with nephrotoxicity observed in 11.50% of patients. Multifactorial analysis identified APACHE II scores and vasoactive drug use as independent predictors of ineffective treatment, while treatment duration and albumin levels predicted effective treatment. ROC analysis indicated that albumin levels >34 g/L, APACHE II scores <13, and treatment duration >10 days correlated with better clinical efficacy.
Conclusion: Colistin sulfate is both safe and effective in clinical settings. Factors such as treatment duration, albumin levels, APACHE II scores, and vasoactive drug use independently affect its clinical efficacy, providing valuable guidance for its informed clinical application.
期刊介绍:
About Journal
Editors
Peer Reviewers
Articles
Article Publishing Charges
Aims and Scope
Call For Papers
ISSN: 1178-6973
Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony
An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.