用于识别恶性肿瘤患者腹盆腔计算机断层扫描中被忽视的肺转移的人工智能系统。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hye Soo Cho, Eui Jin Hwang, Jaeyoun Yi, Boorym Choi, Chang Min Park
{"title":"用于识别恶性肿瘤患者腹盆腔计算机断层扫描中被忽视的肺转移的人工智能系统。","authors":"Hye Soo Cho, Eui Jin Hwang, Jaeyoun Yi, Boorym Choi, Chang Min Park","doi":"10.4274/dir.2024.242835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system can identify basal lung metastatic nodules examined using abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) that were initially overlooked by radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included abdominopelvic CT images with the following inclusion criteria: a) CT images from patients with solid organ malignancies between March 1 and March 31, 2019, in a single institution; and b) abdominal CT images interpreted as negative for basal lung metastases. Reference standards for diagnosis of lung metastases were confirmed by reviewing medical records and subsequent CT images. An AI system that could automatically detect lung nodules on CT images was applied retrospectively. A radiologist reviewed the AI detection results to classify them as lesions with the possibility of metastasis or clearly benign. The performance of the initial AI results and the radiologist's review of the AI results were evaluated using patient-level and lesion-level sensitivities, false-positive rates, and the number of false-positive lesions per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 878 patients (580 men; mean age, 63 years) were included, with overlooked basal lung metastases confirmed in 13 patients (1.5%). The AI exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.911 for the identification of overlooked basal lung metastases. Patient- and lesion-level sensitivities of the AI system ranged from 69.2% to 92.3% and 46.2% to 92.3%, respectively. After a radiologist reviewed the AI results, the sensitivity remained unchanged. The false-positive rate and number of false-positive lesions per patient ranged from 5.8% to 27.6% and 0.1% to 0.5%, respectively. Radiologist reviews significantly reduced the false-positive rate (2.4%-12.6%; all <i>P</i> values < 0.001) and the number of false-positive lesions detected per patient (0.03-0.20, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI system could accurately identify basal lung metastases detected in abdominopelvic CT images that were overlooked by radiologists, suggesting its potential as a tool for radiologist interpretation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The AI system can identify missed basal lung lesions in abdominopelvic CT scans in patients with malignancy, providing feedback to radiologists, which can reduce the risk of missing basal lung metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence system for identification of overlooked lung metastasis in abdominopelvic computed tomography scans of patients with malignancy.\",\"authors\":\"Hye Soo Cho, Eui Jin Hwang, Jaeyoun Yi, Boorym Choi, Chang Min Park\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/dir.2024.242835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system can identify basal lung metastatic nodules examined using abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) that were initially overlooked by radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included abdominopelvic CT images with the following inclusion criteria: a) CT images from patients with solid organ malignancies between March 1 and March 31, 2019, in a single institution; and b) abdominal CT images interpreted as negative for basal lung metastases. Reference standards for diagnosis of lung metastases were confirmed by reviewing medical records and subsequent CT images. An AI system that could automatically detect lung nodules on CT images was applied retrospectively. A radiologist reviewed the AI detection results to classify them as lesions with the possibility of metastasis or clearly benign. The performance of the initial AI results and the radiologist's review of the AI results were evaluated using patient-level and lesion-level sensitivities, false-positive rates, and the number of false-positive lesions per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 878 patients (580 men; mean age, 63 years) were included, with overlooked basal lung metastases confirmed in 13 patients (1.5%). The AI exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.911 for the identification of overlooked basal lung metastases. Patient- and lesion-level sensitivities of the AI system ranged from 69.2% to 92.3% and 46.2% to 92.3%, respectively. After a radiologist reviewed the AI results, the sensitivity remained unchanged. The false-positive rate and number of false-positive lesions per patient ranged from 5.8% to 27.6% and 0.1% to 0.5%, respectively. Radiologist reviews significantly reduced the false-positive rate (2.4%-12.6%; all <i>P</i> values < 0.001) and the number of false-positive lesions detected per patient (0.03-0.20, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI system could accurately identify basal lung metastases detected in abdominopelvic CT images that were overlooked by radiologists, suggesting its potential as a tool for radiologist interpretation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The AI system can identify missed basal lung lesions in abdominopelvic CT scans in patients with malignancy, providing feedback to radiologists, which can reduce the risk of missing basal lung metastasis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2024.242835\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2024.242835","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)系统能否识别出使用腹盆腔计算机断层扫描(CT)检查出的最初被放射科医生忽视的基底肺转移结节:我们回顾性地纳入了具有以下纳入标准的腹盆腔CT图像:a)2019年3月1日至3月31日期间来自单一机构的实体器官恶性肿瘤患者的CT图像;b)腹部CT图像被解释为基底肺转移阴性。通过查看病历和随后的 CT 图像,确认了诊断肺转移的参考标准。回顾性应用了可自动检测 CT 图像上肺结节的人工智能系统。放射科医生对人工智能检测结果进行审查,将其分为有转移可能的病灶和明显的良性病灶。使用患者级别和病灶级别的灵敏度、假阳性率和每位患者的假阳性病灶数量评估了初始人工智能结果和放射科医生对人工智能结果的审查:共纳入了 878 名患者(580 名男性,平均年龄 63 岁),其中 13 名患者(1.5%)证实了被忽视的基底肺转移。人工智能在识别被忽视的基底肺转移方面的接收者操作特征曲线下面积值为0.911。人工智能系统对患者和病灶的敏感度分别为 69.2% 至 92.3% 和 46.2% 至 92.3%。在放射科医生审核 AI 结果后,灵敏度保持不变。每位患者的假阳性率和假阳性病变数量分别为 5.8% 至 27.6% 和 0.1% 至 0.5%。放射医师的复查大大降低了假阳性率(2.4%-12.6%;所有P值均小于0.001)和每位患者检测到的假阳性病变数量(分别为0.03-0.20):结论:人工智能系统能准确识别出放射科医生在腹盆腔CT图像中忽略的基底肺转移灶,这表明它有可能成为放射科医生解读图像的工具:人工智能系统可以识别恶性肿瘤患者腹盆腔CT扫描中漏诊的肺基底病变,为放射科医生提供反馈,从而降低漏诊肺基底转移的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence system for identification of overlooked lung metastasis in abdominopelvic computed tomography scans of patients with malignancy.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system can identify basal lung metastatic nodules examined using abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) that were initially overlooked by radiologists.

Methods: We retrospectively included abdominopelvic CT images with the following inclusion criteria: a) CT images from patients with solid organ malignancies between March 1 and March 31, 2019, in a single institution; and b) abdominal CT images interpreted as negative for basal lung metastases. Reference standards for diagnosis of lung metastases were confirmed by reviewing medical records and subsequent CT images. An AI system that could automatically detect lung nodules on CT images was applied retrospectively. A radiologist reviewed the AI detection results to classify them as lesions with the possibility of metastasis or clearly benign. The performance of the initial AI results and the radiologist's review of the AI results were evaluated using patient-level and lesion-level sensitivities, false-positive rates, and the number of false-positive lesions per patient.

Results: A total of 878 patients (580 men; mean age, 63 years) were included, with overlooked basal lung metastases confirmed in 13 patients (1.5%). The AI exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.911 for the identification of overlooked basal lung metastases. Patient- and lesion-level sensitivities of the AI system ranged from 69.2% to 92.3% and 46.2% to 92.3%, respectively. After a radiologist reviewed the AI results, the sensitivity remained unchanged. The false-positive rate and number of false-positive lesions per patient ranged from 5.8% to 27.6% and 0.1% to 0.5%, respectively. Radiologist reviews significantly reduced the false-positive rate (2.4%-12.6%; all P values < 0.001) and the number of false-positive lesions detected per patient (0.03-0.20, respectively).

Conclusion: The AI system could accurately identify basal lung metastases detected in abdominopelvic CT images that were overlooked by radiologists, suggesting its potential as a tool for radiologist interpretation.

Clinical significance: The AI system can identify missed basal lung lesions in abdominopelvic CT scans in patients with malignancy, providing feedback to radiologists, which can reduce the risk of missing basal lung metastasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信