内窥镜集成多点激光系统对颅底前部缺损进行定量测量。

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

Clinical Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1111/coa.14219

Gani Nuredini, Priscilla Parmar, Andrew Hall, Annakan Navaratnam

引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍：内窥镜鼻窦手术（ESS）中的测量通常精度不一。我们的目的是验证内窥镜多点综合激光系统（EIMLS）在ESS中的应用，该系统可获得百分之一毫米以内的测量值：方法：使用在视野中投射 49 个激光点的 4.4 毫米柔性内窥镜 EIMLS 评估模拟前颅底缺损。由两名外科医生进行前后和侧面测量并重复 20 次。这些测量结果与使用手术卡尺进行的测量结果进行了比较。对观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性进行了评估：每位耳鼻喉科外科医生对模拟颅底缺损进行了 80 次测量，并与人工测量结果进行了比较。显示的平均差异为 0.56 厘米。Bland-Altman图显示偏差较低（0.044），但95%的一致性范围较宽（-1.8-1.9）：结论：EIMLS 可以在模拟 ESS 环境中进行可靠、简便的测量。结论：EIMLS 可在模拟 ESS 环境中进行可靠、简便的测量，该技术的应用为未来临床环境带来了希望，但还需要进一步改进以提高准确性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Endoscopic Integrated Multipoint Laser System to Perform Quantitative Measurements for Anterior Skull Base Defects

查看原文本刊更多论文

Endoscopic Integrated Multipoint Laser System to Perform Quantitative Measurements for Anterior Skull Base Defects

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

4.80%

发文量

106

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with: current otorhinolaryngological practice audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL head and neck oncology head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery continuing medical education and ORL training The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research. Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject. • Negative/null results In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.