使用皮下腹壁提升法进行无气缩孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(GRP-LM)的影响因素:对日本966例大型队列的回顾性分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hiroe Ito, Yasukazu Sagawa, Junko Nakagawa, Tomoyoshi Akaeda, Kiyoaki Tsutsumi, Keiichi Isaka
{"title":"使用皮下腹壁提升法进行无气缩孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(GRP-LM)的影响因素:对日本966例大型队列的回顾性分析。","authors":"Hiroe Ito, Yasukazu Sagawa, Junko Nakagawa, Tomoyoshi Akaeda, Kiyoaki Tsutsumi, Keiichi Isaka","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07706-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the usefulness of gasless reduced-port laparoscopic myomectomy (GRP-LM) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In GRP-LM, after lifting the abdominal wall by a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method, a 1.5-cm incision is made in the lateral abdomen, Lap Protector<sup>®</sup> is placed. The operation is performed by two surgeons, one who inserts multiple forceps from the Lap Protector and performs the operation, and an assistant who operates the laparoscope and uterine manipulator. The surgical outcome of GRP-LM and the factors that affect it were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GRP-LM was performed in 966 patients. Complications (0.5%) and blood transfusions (0.3%) were remarkably rare, and there were no cases of conversion to open surgery. With regard to the correlation between the number of fibroids extracted and each factor, the number of fibroids extracted correlated with fibroid weight and operation time, but not with blood loss. The average number of sutures per case was 21, and the average suture and ligation time per suture was 77 s. Comparing the cost of GRP-LM with that of the conventional insufflation LM, a saving of $875 was possible with GRP-LM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GRP-LM is a suitable for multiple fibroids, and is cosmetic and economical, because it allows rapid and reliable suture and ligation, despite having only one port for the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting gasless reduced-port laparoscopic myomectomy (GRP-LM) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method: a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of 966 cases in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroe Ito, Yasukazu Sagawa, Junko Nakagawa, Tomoyoshi Akaeda, Kiyoaki Tsutsumi, Keiichi Isaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07706-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the usefulness of gasless reduced-port laparoscopic myomectomy (GRP-LM) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In GRP-LM, after lifting the abdominal wall by a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method, a 1.5-cm incision is made in the lateral abdomen, Lap Protector<sup>®</sup> is placed. The operation is performed by two surgeons, one who inserts multiple forceps from the Lap Protector and performs the operation, and an assistant who operates the laparoscope and uterine manipulator. The surgical outcome of GRP-LM and the factors that affect it were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GRP-LM was performed in 966 patients. Complications (0.5%) and blood transfusions (0.3%) were remarkably rare, and there were no cases of conversion to open surgery. With regard to the correlation between the number of fibroids extracted and each factor, the number of fibroids extracted correlated with fibroid weight and operation time, but not with blood loss. The average number of sutures per case was 21, and the average suture and ligation time per suture was 77 s. Comparing the cost of GRP-LM with that of the conventional insufflation LM, a saving of $875 was possible with GRP-LM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GRP-LM is a suitable for multiple fibroids, and is cosmetic and economical, because it allows rapid and reliable suture and ligation, despite having only one port for the procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07706-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07706-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估无气减孔腹腔镜肌瘤切除术(GRP-LM)使用皮下腹壁提升法的实用性:在 GRP-LM 中,通过皮下腹壁提升法提升腹壁后,在侧腹部开一个 1.5 厘米的切口,放置 Lap Protector®。手术由两名外科医生进行,一名外科医生从 Lap Protector 中插入多个钳子并进行手术,另一名助手操作腹腔镜和子宫操作器。我们对 GRP-LM 的手术效果和影响因素进行了调查:结果:966 名患者接受了 GRP-LM 手术。并发症(0.5%)和输血(0.3%)非常罕见,而且没有转为开腹手术的病例。关于肌瘤剔除数量与各因素之间的相关性,肌瘤剔除数量与肌瘤重量和手术时间相关,但与失血量无关。每例平均缝合次数为 21 次,每次缝合和结扎的平均时间为 77 秒。将 GRP-LM 的成本与传统的充气 LM 相比,GRP-LM 可节省 875 美元:结论:GRP-LM 适用于多发性子宫肌瘤,既美观又经济,因为它可以快速、可靠地缝合和结扎,尽管只有一个手术孔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors affecting gasless reduced-port laparoscopic myomectomy (GRP-LM) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method: a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of 966 cases in Japan.

Factors affecting gasless reduced-port laparoscopic myomectomy (GRP-LM) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method: a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of 966 cases in Japan.

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of gasless reduced-port laparoscopic myomectomy (GRP-LM) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method.

Methods: In GRP-LM, after lifting the abdominal wall by a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method, a 1.5-cm incision is made in the lateral abdomen, Lap Protector® is placed. The operation is performed by two surgeons, one who inserts multiple forceps from the Lap Protector and performs the operation, and an assistant who operates the laparoscope and uterine manipulator. The surgical outcome of GRP-LM and the factors that affect it were investigated.

Results: GRP-LM was performed in 966 patients. Complications (0.5%) and blood transfusions (0.3%) were remarkably rare, and there were no cases of conversion to open surgery. With regard to the correlation between the number of fibroids extracted and each factor, the number of fibroids extracted correlated with fibroid weight and operation time, but not with blood loss. The average number of sutures per case was 21, and the average suture and ligation time per suture was 77 s. Comparing the cost of GRP-LM with that of the conventional insufflation LM, a saving of $875 was possible with GRP-LM.

Conclusion: GRP-LM is a suitable for multiple fibroids, and is cosmetic and economical, because it allows rapid and reliable suture and ligation, despite having only one port for the procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信