检测和量化爱尔兰都柏林一个主要铁路终点站附近火车和公路交通产生的 PM2.5 和二氧化氮。

IF 7.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shanmuga Priyan, Yuxuan Guo, Aonghus McNabola, Brian Broderick, Brian Caulfield, Margaret O'Mahony, John Gallagher
{"title":"检测和量化爱尔兰都柏林一个主要铁路终点站附近火车和公路交通产生的 PM2.5 和二氧化氮。","authors":"Shanmuga Priyan, Yuxuan Guo, Aonghus McNabola, Brian Broderick, Brian Caulfield, Margaret O'Mahony, John Gallagher","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Air pollution from transport hubs is a recognised health concern for local urban inhabitants. Within the domain of transport hubs, significant attention has been given to larger airport and port settings, however concerns have been raised about emissions from urban railway hubs, especially those with diesel trains. This paper presents an approach that adopts low-cost monitoring (LCM) for fixed site monitoring (FSM) to quantify and disaggregate PM<sub>2.5</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> contributions from railway station and road traffic on air quality in the vicinity of railway station in Dublin, Ireland. The NO<sub>2</sub> sensor showed larger discrepancies than the PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensor when compared to the reference monitor. Machine learning models (XGBoost and Random Forest (RF) regression) were applied to calibrate the LCM devices, with the XGBoost model (NO<sub>2,</sub> R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8 and RSME = 9.1 μg/m<sup>3</sup> & PM<sub>2.5</sub>, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.92 and RSME = 2.2 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) deemed more appropriate than the RF model. Local wind conditions, pressure, PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, and road traffic significantly impacted NO<sub>2</sub> model results, while raw PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensor readings greatly influenced the PM<sub>2.5</sub> model output. This highlights that the NO<sub>2</sub> sensor requires more input data for accurate calibration, unlike the PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensor. The monitoring results from the one-month monitoring campaign from 25 May 2023 to 25 June 2023 presented elevated NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations measured at the railway station, which translated to exceedances of the annual WHO limits (PM<sub>2.5</sub> = 5 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub> = 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) by 1.6-1.8 and 3.2-5.2 times respectively at the study site. A subsequent data filtering technique based on wind orientation, revealed that the railway station was the main PM<sub>2.5</sub> source and road traffic was the main NO<sub>2</sub> source when winds come from the railway station. This study highlights the value of LCM devices alongside robust machine learning techniques to capture air quality in urban settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting and quantifying PM<sub>2.5</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> contributions from train and road traffic in the vicinity of a major railway terminal in Dublin, Ireland.\",\"authors\":\"Shanmuga Priyan, Yuxuan Guo, Aonghus McNabola, Brian Broderick, Brian Caulfield, Margaret O'Mahony, John Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Air pollution from transport hubs is a recognised health concern for local urban inhabitants. Within the domain of transport hubs, significant attention has been given to larger airport and port settings, however concerns have been raised about emissions from urban railway hubs, especially those with diesel trains. This paper presents an approach that adopts low-cost monitoring (LCM) for fixed site monitoring (FSM) to quantify and disaggregate PM<sub>2.5</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> contributions from railway station and road traffic on air quality in the vicinity of railway station in Dublin, Ireland. The NO<sub>2</sub> sensor showed larger discrepancies than the PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensor when compared to the reference monitor. Machine learning models (XGBoost and Random Forest (RF) regression) were applied to calibrate the LCM devices, with the XGBoost model (NO<sub>2,</sub> R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8 and RSME = 9.1 μg/m<sup>3</sup> & PM<sub>2.5</sub>, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.92 and RSME = 2.2 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) deemed more appropriate than the RF model. Local wind conditions, pressure, PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, and road traffic significantly impacted NO<sub>2</sub> model results, while raw PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensor readings greatly influenced the PM<sub>2.5</sub> model output. This highlights that the NO<sub>2</sub> sensor requires more input data for accurate calibration, unlike the PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensor. The monitoring results from the one-month monitoring campaign from 25 May 2023 to 25 June 2023 presented elevated NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations measured at the railway station, which translated to exceedances of the annual WHO limits (PM<sub>2.5</sub> = 5 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub> = 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) by 1.6-1.8 and 3.2-5.2 times respectively at the study site. A subsequent data filtering technique based on wind orientation, revealed that the railway station was the main PM<sub>2.5</sub> source and road traffic was the main NO<sub>2</sub> source when winds come from the railway station. This study highlights the value of LCM devices alongside robust machine learning techniques to capture air quality in urban settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Pollution\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124903\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通枢纽的空气污染是当地城市居民公认的健康问题。在交通枢纽领域,较大的机场和港口环境受到了极大关注,但城市铁路枢纽,尤其是使用柴油列车的铁路枢纽的排放问题也引起了人们的关注。本文介绍了一种采用低成本监测(LCM)进行固定地点监测(FSM)的方法,以量化和分解火车站和道路交通对爱尔兰都柏林火车站附近空气质量产生的 PM2.5 和二氧化氮的影响。与参考监测仪相比,二氧化氮传感器显示出比 PM2.5 传感器更大的差异。机器学习模型(XGBoost 和随机森林 (RF) 回归)被用于校准 LCM 设备,其中 XGBoost 模型(NO2,R2 = 0.8,RSME = 9.1 μg/m3 和 PM2.5,R2 = 0.92,RSME = 2.2 μg/m3)被认为比 RF 模型更合适。当地风力条件、气压、PM2.5 浓度和道路交通对 NO2 模型结果影响很大,而 PM2.5 传感器的原始读数对 PM2.5 模型输出影响很大。这突出表明,与 PM2.5 传感器不同,二氧化氮传感器需要更多的输入数据来进行精确校准。从 2023 年 5 月 25 日至 2023 年 6 月 25 日为期一个月的监测活动的监测结果显示,在火车站测得的二氧化氮和 PM2.5 浓度升高,导致研究地点的 PM2.5 = 5 μg/m3 和二氧化氮 = 10 μg/m3 分别超出世界卫生组织年度限值的 1.6-1.8 倍和 3.2-5.2 倍。随后基于风向的数据过滤技术显示,当风来自火车站时,火车站是 PM2.5 的主要来源,而道路交通是 NO2 的主要来源。这项研究强调了 LCM 设备和强大的机器学习技术在捕捉城市环境空气质量方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting and quantifying PM2.5 and NO2 contributions from train and road traffic in the vicinity of a major railway terminal in Dublin, Ireland.

Air pollution from transport hubs is a recognised health concern for local urban inhabitants. Within the domain of transport hubs, significant attention has been given to larger airport and port settings, however concerns have been raised about emissions from urban railway hubs, especially those with diesel trains. This paper presents an approach that adopts low-cost monitoring (LCM) for fixed site monitoring (FSM) to quantify and disaggregate PM2.5 and NO2 contributions from railway station and road traffic on air quality in the vicinity of railway station in Dublin, Ireland. The NO2 sensor showed larger discrepancies than the PM2.5 sensor when compared to the reference monitor. Machine learning models (XGBoost and Random Forest (RF) regression) were applied to calibrate the LCM devices, with the XGBoost model (NO2, R2 = 0.8 and RSME = 9.1 μg/m3 & PM2.5, R2 = 0.92 and RSME = 2.2 μg/m3) deemed more appropriate than the RF model. Local wind conditions, pressure, PM2.5 concentrations, and road traffic significantly impacted NO2 model results, while raw PM2.5 sensor readings greatly influenced the PM2.5 model output. This highlights that the NO2 sensor requires more input data for accurate calibration, unlike the PM2.5 sensor. The monitoring results from the one-month monitoring campaign from 25 May 2023 to 25 June 2023 presented elevated NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations measured at the railway station, which translated to exceedances of the annual WHO limits (PM2.5 = 5 μg/m3, NO2 = 10 μg/m3) by 1.6-1.8 and 3.2-5.2 times respectively at the study site. A subsequent data filtering technique based on wind orientation, revealed that the railway station was the main PM2.5 source and road traffic was the main NO2 source when winds come from the railway station. This study highlights the value of LCM devices alongside robust machine learning techniques to capture air quality in urban settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信