Kristine A Tsantilas, Gennifer E Merrihew, Julia E Robbins, Richard S Johnson, Jea Park, Deanna L Plubell, Jesse D Canterbury, Eric Huang, Michael Riffle, Vagisha Sharma, Brendan X MacLean, Josh Eckels, Christine C Wu, Michael S Bereman, Sandra E Spencer, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Michael J MacCoss
{"title":"定量蛋白质组学质量控制框架","authors":"Kristine A Tsantilas, Gennifer E Merrihew, Julia E Robbins, Richard S Johnson, Jea Park, Deanna L Plubell, Jesse D Canterbury, Eric Huang, Michael Riffle, Vagisha Sharma, Brendan X MacLean, Josh Eckels, Christine C Wu, Michael S Bereman, Sandra E Spencer, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Michael J MacCoss","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A thorough evaluation of the quality, reproducibility, and variability of bottom-up proteomics data is necessary at every stage of a workflow, from planning to analysis. We share vignettes applying adaptable quality control (QC) measures to assess sample preparation, system function, and quantitative analysis. System suitability samples are repeatedly measured longitudinally with targeted methods, and we share examples where they are used on three instrument platforms to identify severe system failures and track function over months to years. Internal QCs incorporated at the protein and peptide levels allow our team to assess sample preparation issues and to differentiate system failures from sample-specific issues. External QC samples prepared alongside our experimental samples are used to verify the consistency and quantitative potential of our results during batch correction and normalization before assessing biological phenotypes. We combine these controls with rapid analysis (Skyline), longitudinal QC metrics (AutoQC), and server-based data deposition (PanoramaWeb). We propose that this integrated approach to QC is a useful starting point for groups to facilitate rapid quality control assessment to ensure that valuable instrument time is used to collect the best quality data possible. Data are available on Panorama Public and ProteomeXchange under the identifier PXD051318.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for Quality Control in Quantitative Proteomics.\",\"authors\":\"Kristine A Tsantilas, Gennifer E Merrihew, Julia E Robbins, Richard S Johnson, Jea Park, Deanna L Plubell, Jesse D Canterbury, Eric Huang, Michael Riffle, Vagisha Sharma, Brendan X MacLean, Josh Eckels, Christine C Wu, Michael S Bereman, Sandra E Spencer, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Michael J MacCoss\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A thorough evaluation of the quality, reproducibility, and variability of bottom-up proteomics data is necessary at every stage of a workflow, from planning to analysis. We share vignettes applying adaptable quality control (QC) measures to assess sample preparation, system function, and quantitative analysis. System suitability samples are repeatedly measured longitudinally with targeted methods, and we share examples where they are used on three instrument platforms to identify severe system failures and track function over months to years. Internal QCs incorporated at the protein and peptide levels allow our team to assess sample preparation issues and to differentiate system failures from sample-specific issues. External QC samples prepared alongside our experimental samples are used to verify the consistency and quantitative potential of our results during batch correction and normalization before assessing biological phenotypes. We combine these controls with rapid analysis (Skyline), longitudinal QC metrics (AutoQC), and server-based data deposition (PanoramaWeb). We propose that this integrated approach to QC is a useful starting point for groups to facilitate rapid quality control assessment to ensure that valuable instrument time is used to collect the best quality data possible. Data are available on Panorama Public and ProteomeXchange under the identifier PXD051318.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00363\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从计划到分析,在工作流程的每个阶段都有必要对自下而上蛋白质组学数据的质量、可重复性和可变性进行全面评估。我们分享了一些应用可调整的质量控制(QC)措施来评估样品制备、系统功能和定量分析的案例。我们分享了在三个仪器平台上使用这些方法识别严重系统故障并跟踪数月至数年功能的实例。在蛋白质和肽水平上加入内部质量控制,使我们的团队能够评估样品制备问题,并将系统故障与特定样品问题区分开来。与实验样本同时制备的外部质控样本用于在评估生物表型之前的批次校正和归一化过程中验证结果的一致性和定量潜力。我们将这些控制与快速分析(Skyline)、纵向质控指标(AutoQC)和基于服务器的数据沉积(PanoramaWeb)相结合。我们建议,这种综合质量控制方法是各小组促进快速质量控制评估的有用起点,以确保将宝贵的仪器时间用于收集尽可能高质量的数据。数据可在 Panorama Public 和 ProteomeXchange 上查阅,标识符为 PXD051318。
A Framework for Quality Control in Quantitative Proteomics.
A thorough evaluation of the quality, reproducibility, and variability of bottom-up proteomics data is necessary at every stage of a workflow, from planning to analysis. We share vignettes applying adaptable quality control (QC) measures to assess sample preparation, system function, and quantitative analysis. System suitability samples are repeatedly measured longitudinally with targeted methods, and we share examples where they are used on three instrument platforms to identify severe system failures and track function over months to years. Internal QCs incorporated at the protein and peptide levels allow our team to assess sample preparation issues and to differentiate system failures from sample-specific issues. External QC samples prepared alongside our experimental samples are used to verify the consistency and quantitative potential of our results during batch correction and normalization before assessing biological phenotypes. We combine these controls with rapid analysis (Skyline), longitudinal QC metrics (AutoQC), and server-based data deposition (PanoramaWeb). We propose that this integrated approach to QC is a useful starting point for groups to facilitate rapid quality control assessment to ensure that valuable instrument time is used to collect the best quality data possible. Data are available on Panorama Public and ProteomeXchange under the identifier PXD051318.