媒体对首席执行官过度自信的描述如何影响激进创新

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Michael D. Howard , Priyanka Dwivedi , Laura D'Oria , Marjorie Lyles , Peter Inho Nahm
{"title":"媒体对首席执行官过度自信的描述如何影响激进创新","authors":"Michael D. Howard ,&nbsp;Priyanka Dwivedi ,&nbsp;Laura D'Oria ,&nbsp;Marjorie Lyles ,&nbsp;Peter Inho Nahm","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The characteristics, actions, and potential biases of strategic leaders play an important role in setting their organizations on the path of radical innovation. An important and growing stream of research has recognized that, due to its impact on a CEO's decision-making processes, CEO overconfidence has critical effects on firm innovation both in terms of the resources that overconfident CEOs are willing to allocate to their firms' innovation activities (input) and the outcome that they reap from these investments (output). However, prior research has yet to fully explore how public, external observations of CEO overconfidence may steer the inner workings of a firm's innovation network toward the pursuit of radical innovation. The socially embedded processes of knowledge diffusion that occur among a firm's knowledge workers may change when they observe the overconfidence of their CEO, affecting a firm's future paths of knowledge exploration—in the pursuit of radical innovations—or paths of knowledge exploitation—in the pursuit of incremental innovation. We draw from agenda-setting theory, cognitive and social psychology, and innovation networks to develop a theoretical framework to address this issue. Our empirical analyses of S&amp;P 500 and S&amp;P 1000 firms in the biotech, pharmaceutical, and medical devices industries suggest that media portrayal of greater CEO overconfidence leads firms' knowledge workers to focus on exploiting core knowledge and reduces their emphasis on exploring new avenues of recombinatory knowledge diffusion. Thus, we uncover a paradox: while overconfident CEOs are more likely to invest in exploratory knowledge search favoring radical innovation, we consider whether knowledge workers observing their overconfidence in the media may be more likely to converge toward exploitative, incremental innovation practices. Our work offers important contributions to research on the relationship between CEO overconfidence and innovation and the understanding of the role of media portrayal of CEOs on knowledge workers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"53 10","pages":"Article 105105"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How media portrayal of CEO overconfidence impacts radical innovation\",\"authors\":\"Michael D. Howard ,&nbsp;Priyanka Dwivedi ,&nbsp;Laura D'Oria ,&nbsp;Marjorie Lyles ,&nbsp;Peter Inho Nahm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The characteristics, actions, and potential biases of strategic leaders play an important role in setting their organizations on the path of radical innovation. An important and growing stream of research has recognized that, due to its impact on a CEO's decision-making processes, CEO overconfidence has critical effects on firm innovation both in terms of the resources that overconfident CEOs are willing to allocate to their firms' innovation activities (input) and the outcome that they reap from these investments (output). However, prior research has yet to fully explore how public, external observations of CEO overconfidence may steer the inner workings of a firm's innovation network toward the pursuit of radical innovation. The socially embedded processes of knowledge diffusion that occur among a firm's knowledge workers may change when they observe the overconfidence of their CEO, affecting a firm's future paths of knowledge exploration—in the pursuit of radical innovations—or paths of knowledge exploitation—in the pursuit of incremental innovation. We draw from agenda-setting theory, cognitive and social psychology, and innovation networks to develop a theoretical framework to address this issue. Our empirical analyses of S&amp;P 500 and S&amp;P 1000 firms in the biotech, pharmaceutical, and medical devices industries suggest that media portrayal of greater CEO overconfidence leads firms' knowledge workers to focus on exploiting core knowledge and reduces their emphasis on exploring new avenues of recombinatory knowledge diffusion. Thus, we uncover a paradox: while overconfident CEOs are more likely to invest in exploratory knowledge search favoring radical innovation, we consider whether knowledge workers observing their overconfidence in the media may be more likely to converge toward exploitative, incremental innovation practices. Our work offers important contributions to research on the relationship between CEO overconfidence and innovation and the understanding of the role of media portrayal of CEOs on knowledge workers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 105105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001549\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001549","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战略领导者的特点、行动和潜在偏见在使组织走上彻底创新之路方面发挥着重要作用。越来越多的重要研究认识到,由于对首席执行官决策过程的影响,首席执行官的过度自信对企业创新有着至关重要的影响,这体现在过度自信的首席执行官愿意分配给企业创新活动的资源(投入)以及他们从这些投资中获得的成果(产出)两方面。然而,先前的研究尚未充分探讨首席执行官过度自信的公开外部观察如何引导企业创新网络的内部运作走向追求激进创新。当企业的知识工作者观察到其首席执行官过于自信时,企业知识工作者之间的社会嵌入式知识传播过程可能会发生变化,从而影响企业未来的知识探索--追求激进创新--或知识利用--追求渐进创新的路径。我们借鉴议程设置理论、认知心理学和社会心理学以及创新网络,建立了一个理论框架来解决这一问题。我们对生物技术、制药和医疗器械行业的 S&P 500 强企业和 S&P 1000 强企业进行的实证分析表明,媒体对首席执行官过度自信的描述导致企业的知识工作者专注于利用核心知识,而减少了对探索重组知识传播新途径的重视。因此,我们发现了一个悖论:过于自信的首席执行官更有可能投资于探索性的知识搜索,倾向于激进式创新,而我们考虑的是,在媒体中观察到他们过于自信的知识工作者是否更有可能趋向于开发性的渐进式创新实践。我们的研究为研究首席执行官过度自信与创新之间的关系以及理解媒体对首席执行官的描述对知识工作者的作用做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How media portrayal of CEO overconfidence impacts radical innovation

The characteristics, actions, and potential biases of strategic leaders play an important role in setting their organizations on the path of radical innovation. An important and growing stream of research has recognized that, due to its impact on a CEO's decision-making processes, CEO overconfidence has critical effects on firm innovation both in terms of the resources that overconfident CEOs are willing to allocate to their firms' innovation activities (input) and the outcome that they reap from these investments (output). However, prior research has yet to fully explore how public, external observations of CEO overconfidence may steer the inner workings of a firm's innovation network toward the pursuit of radical innovation. The socially embedded processes of knowledge diffusion that occur among a firm's knowledge workers may change when they observe the overconfidence of their CEO, affecting a firm's future paths of knowledge exploration—in the pursuit of radical innovations—or paths of knowledge exploitation—in the pursuit of incremental innovation. We draw from agenda-setting theory, cognitive and social psychology, and innovation networks to develop a theoretical framework to address this issue. Our empirical analyses of S&P 500 and S&P 1000 firms in the biotech, pharmaceutical, and medical devices industries suggest that media portrayal of greater CEO overconfidence leads firms' knowledge workers to focus on exploiting core knowledge and reduces their emphasis on exploring new avenues of recombinatory knowledge diffusion. Thus, we uncover a paradox: while overconfident CEOs are more likely to invest in exploratory knowledge search favoring radical innovation, we consider whether knowledge workers observing their overconfidence in the media may be more likely to converge toward exploitative, incremental innovation practices. Our work offers important contributions to research on the relationship between CEO overconfidence and innovation and the understanding of the role of media portrayal of CEOs on knowledge workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信