制度检疫与经济偏好:来自中国的实验证据

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yanan Zhang , Jianbiao Li , Qian Cao , Xiaofei Niu
{"title":"制度检疫与经济偏好:来自中国的实验证据","authors":"Yanan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianbiao Li ,&nbsp;Qian Cao ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Niu","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quarantine is a public health measure that has been used for centuries to curb the spread of infectious diseases, but its social costs remain underexplored. Based on a quarantine event, we conduct online lab-in-the-field experiments in China to examine the effect of institutional quarantine on economic preferences. We find that institutional quarantine reduces social preferences (altruism, trust, and trustworthiness), but has no effect on risk and time preferences. These effects persist throughout the quarantine period. Notably, expressing gratitude through a thank-you note during quarantine can mitigate the adverse effects of institutional quarantine on altruism and trust, though not on trustworthiness. Trust returns to pre-quarantine levels about six months later, altruism also fully recovers after one year and two months, but trustworthiness does not. Policymakers should develop strategies to mitigate the negative social impacts of institutional quarantine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 102251"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional quarantine and economic preferences: Experimental evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Yanan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianbiao Li ,&nbsp;Qian Cao ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Quarantine is a public health measure that has been used for centuries to curb the spread of infectious diseases, but its social costs remain underexplored. Based on a quarantine event, we conduct online lab-in-the-field experiments in China to examine the effect of institutional quarantine on economic preferences. We find that institutional quarantine reduces social preferences (altruism, trust, and trustworthiness), but has no effect on risk and time preferences. These effects persist throughout the quarantine period. Notably, expressing gratitude through a thank-you note during quarantine can mitigate the adverse effects of institutional quarantine on altruism and trust, though not on trustworthiness. Trust returns to pre-quarantine levels about six months later, altruism also fully recovers after one year and two months, but trustworthiness does not. Policymakers should develop strategies to mitigate the negative social impacts of institutional quarantine.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001408\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001408","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

检疫是一种公共卫生措施,数百年来一直用于遏制传染病的传播,但其社会成本仍未得到充分探讨。基于检疫事件,我们在中国进行了 "实验室-现场 "在线实验,研究制度性检疫对经济偏好的影响。我们发现,制度性检疫降低了社会偏好(利他主义、信任和守信),但对风险和时间偏好没有影响。这些影响在整个隔离期间持续存在。值得注意的是,在检疫期间通过感谢信表达感激之情可以减轻制度性检疫对利他主义和信任的不利影响,但不会影响可信度。大约六个月后,信任度恢复到检疫前的水平,利他主义也在一年零两个月后完全恢复,但可信度却没有恢复。政策制定者应制定战略,减轻制度隔离的负面社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional quarantine and economic preferences: Experimental evidence from China

Quarantine is a public health measure that has been used for centuries to curb the spread of infectious diseases, but its social costs remain underexplored. Based on a quarantine event, we conduct online lab-in-the-field experiments in China to examine the effect of institutional quarantine on economic preferences. We find that institutional quarantine reduces social preferences (altruism, trust, and trustworthiness), but has no effect on risk and time preferences. These effects persist throughout the quarantine period. Notably, expressing gratitude through a thank-you note during quarantine can mitigate the adverse effects of institutional quarantine on altruism and trust, though not on trustworthiness. Trust returns to pre-quarantine levels about six months later, altruism also fully recovers after one year and two months, but trustworthiness does not. Policymakers should develop strategies to mitigate the negative social impacts of institutional quarantine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信