Bruna Gonçalves Fonseca Moura, Bruno Pérez Ferreira, Ana Carolina Costa Corrêa
{"title":"巴西银行的风险承担和系统性风险","authors":"Bruna Gonçalves Fonseca Moura, Bruno Pérez Ferreira, Ana Carolina Costa Corrêa","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyzes the marginal contribution of Brazilian banks to the systemic risk. The objective is to identify whether banks that share common characteristics similarly contribute to systemic financial shocks. First, the risk assumed by a sample of listed banks is measured from the accounting, market, and regulatory perspectives. Sample banks were segregated using an unsupervised clustering model. The results were compared with the methodology currently used by the Central Bank of Brazil to segment the banking institutions. Finally, we evaluate the banking groups’ marginal contribution to systemic financial risk using <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>C</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>R</mi></mrow></math></span>. These results suggest that institutions that share similar characteristics in relation to their risk profiles behave similarly during times of greater market stress. Notably, size, geographic diversification, and liquidity were common attributes among banks contributing significantly to systemic risk during financial crises. This study advances the field of banking finance by introducing an analytical framework that goes beyond the traditional focus on bank balance sheet size, aligning with international standards for evaluating the systemic importance of financial institutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 101913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brazilian banks risk-taking and systemic risk\",\"authors\":\"Bruna Gonçalves Fonseca Moura, Bruno Pérez Ferreira, Ana Carolina Costa Corrêa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study analyzes the marginal contribution of Brazilian banks to the systemic risk. The objective is to identify whether banks that share common characteristics similarly contribute to systemic financial shocks. First, the risk assumed by a sample of listed banks is measured from the accounting, market, and regulatory perspectives. Sample banks were segregated using an unsupervised clustering model. The results were compared with the methodology currently used by the Central Bank of Brazil to segment the banking institutions. Finally, we evaluate the banking groups’ marginal contribution to systemic financial risk using <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>C</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>R</mi></mrow></math></span>. These results suggest that institutions that share similar characteristics in relation to their risk profiles behave similarly during times of greater market stress. Notably, size, geographic diversification, and liquidity were common attributes among banks contributing significantly to systemic risk during financial crises. This study advances the field of banking finance by introducing an analytical framework that goes beyond the traditional focus on bank balance sheet size, aligning with international standards for evaluating the systemic importance of financial institutions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924001194\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924001194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This study analyzes the marginal contribution of Brazilian banks to the systemic risk. The objective is to identify whether banks that share common characteristics similarly contribute to systemic financial shocks. First, the risk assumed by a sample of listed banks is measured from the accounting, market, and regulatory perspectives. Sample banks were segregated using an unsupervised clustering model. The results were compared with the methodology currently used by the Central Bank of Brazil to segment the banking institutions. Finally, we evaluate the banking groups’ marginal contribution to systemic financial risk using . These results suggest that institutions that share similar characteristics in relation to their risk profiles behave similarly during times of greater market stress. Notably, size, geographic diversification, and liquidity were common attributes among banks contributing significantly to systemic risk during financial crises. This study advances the field of banking finance by introducing an analytical framework that goes beyond the traditional focus on bank balance sheet size, aligning with international standards for evaluating the systemic importance of financial institutions.
期刊介绍:
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.