内生生育率模型下的教育选择和人力资本积累

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Hiroki Tanaka , Masaya Yasuoka
{"title":"内生生育率模型下的教育选择和人力资本积累","authors":"Hiroki Tanaka ,&nbsp;Masaya Yasuoka","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper, after presenting development of an endogenous fertility model with endogenous education investment, examines determination of the shares of households which select public education, income growth, income inequality, and fertility. Results demonstrate that a child allowance raises the share of households selecting public education. Furthermore, an increase in a subsidy for private education investment is not always sufficient to raise aggregate human capital accumulation, even if the share of households selecting private education is large. Furthermore, this paper presents an examination of how government spending on subsidy policies is determined as a result of a voting system. Numerical examples verify the result obtained using the theoretical model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 194-207"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education choice and human capital accumulation with an endogenous fertility model\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Tanaka ,&nbsp;Masaya Yasuoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2024.08.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper, after presenting development of an endogenous fertility model with endogenous education investment, examines determination of the shares of households which select public education, income growth, income inequality, and fertility. Results demonstrate that a child allowance raises the share of households selecting public education. Furthermore, an increase in a subsidy for private education investment is not always sufficient to raise aggregate human capital accumulation, even if the share of households selecting private education is large. Furthermore, this paper presents an examination of how government spending on subsidy policies is determined as a result of a voting system. Numerical examples verify the result obtained using the theoretical model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 194-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在介绍了一个具有内生教育投资的内生生育率模型后,研究了选择公共教育的家庭比例、收入增长、收入不平等和生育率的决定因素。结果表明,儿童津贴提高了选择公共教育的家庭比例。此外,即使选择私立教育的家庭比例很大,增加对私立教育投资的补贴也不一定足以提高人力资本积累总量。此外,本文还探讨了投票制度如何决定政府在补贴政策上的支出。数字实例验证了理论模型得出的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education choice and human capital accumulation with an endogenous fertility model

This paper, after presenting development of an endogenous fertility model with endogenous education investment, examines determination of the shares of households which select public education, income growth, income inequality, and fertility. Results demonstrate that a child allowance raises the share of households selecting public education. Furthermore, an increase in a subsidy for private education investment is not always sufficient to raise aggregate human capital accumulation, even if the share of households selecting private education is large. Furthermore, this paper presents an examination of how government spending on subsidy policies is determined as a result of a voting system. Numerical examples verify the result obtained using the theoretical model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信