功能鉴赏量表(FAS)在哥伦比亚和西班牙的测量不变性和项目功能差异

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Moisés Mebarak , Christophe Maïano , Juan Mendoza , Ángel Zamora , Rosa Baños , Lorena Desdentado , Marta Miragall , Rocío Herrero , Viren Swami
{"title":"功能鉴赏量表(FAS)在哥伦比亚和西班牙的测量不变性和项目功能差异","authors":"Moisés Mebarak ,&nbsp;Christophe Maïano ,&nbsp;Juan Mendoza ,&nbsp;Ángel Zamora ,&nbsp;Rosa Baños ,&nbsp;Lorena Desdentado ,&nbsp;Marta Miragall ,&nbsp;Rocío Herrero ,&nbsp;Viren Swami","doi":"10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS) is increasingly used in diverse national and linguistic contexts. However, limited work has assessed the extent to which the instrument demonstrates measurement invariance and differential item functioning (DIF) across nations and respondent characteristics. Here, we examined measurement invariance and DIF of the FAS using archival data from adults in Colombia (Mebarak et al., 2023) and Spain (Zamora et al., 2024). Participants included 1420 (women <em>n</em> = 804, men <em>n</em> = 616) respondents from Colombia and 838 (women <em>n</em> = 415, men <em>n</em> = 423) respondents from Spain who completed translations of the FAS. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure of the FAS in both national groups. Additionally, the FAS achieved full measurement invariance (up to latent mean invariance) across both groups. We also found that the FAS lacked DIF as a function of age, body mass index (BMI), and gender identity across both national groups. Older participants (relative to younger participants), men (relative to women), and participants with lower BMIs (relative to those with higher BMIs) had higher FAS scores. These results support the notion that the FAS is measuring a common underlying construct across these national groups and respondent characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48312,"journal":{"name":"Body Image","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101787"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement invariance and differential item functioning of the functionality appreciation scale (FAS) in Colombia and Spain\",\"authors\":\"Moisés Mebarak ,&nbsp;Christophe Maïano ,&nbsp;Juan Mendoza ,&nbsp;Ángel Zamora ,&nbsp;Rosa Baños ,&nbsp;Lorena Desdentado ,&nbsp;Marta Miragall ,&nbsp;Rocío Herrero ,&nbsp;Viren Swami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS) is increasingly used in diverse national and linguistic contexts. However, limited work has assessed the extent to which the instrument demonstrates measurement invariance and differential item functioning (DIF) across nations and respondent characteristics. Here, we examined measurement invariance and DIF of the FAS using archival data from adults in Colombia (Mebarak et al., 2023) and Spain (Zamora et al., 2024). Participants included 1420 (women <em>n</em> = 804, men <em>n</em> = 616) respondents from Colombia and 838 (women <em>n</em> = 415, men <em>n</em> = 423) respondents from Spain who completed translations of the FAS. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure of the FAS in both national groups. Additionally, the FAS achieved full measurement invariance (up to latent mean invariance) across both groups. We also found that the FAS lacked DIF as a function of age, body mass index (BMI), and gender identity across both national groups. Older participants (relative to younger participants), men (relative to women), and participants with lower BMIs (relative to those with higher BMIs) had higher FAS scores. These results support the notion that the FAS is measuring a common underlying construct across these national groups and respondent characteristics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Body Image\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Body Image\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144524001098\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144524001098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

功能鉴赏量表(FAS)越来越多地被用于不同的国家和语言环境中。然而,对该量表在不同国家和受访者特征之间的测量不变性和差异项目功能(DIF)进行评估的工作十分有限。在此,我们使用来自哥伦比亚(Mebarak 等人,2023 年)和西班牙(Zamora 等人,2024 年)成年人的档案数据对 FAS 的测量不变性和 DIF 进行了研究。参与者包括哥伦比亚的 1420 名受访者(女性为 804 人,男性为 616 人)和西班牙的 838 名受访者(女性为 415 人,男性为 423 人),他们都完成了 FAS 的翻译。在这两个国家组中,确认性因素分析都支持 FAS 的单维结构。此外,FAS 在两个群体中都实现了完全的测量不变性(达到潜在平均不变性)。我们还发现,在两个国家组中,FAS 在年龄、体重指数(BMI)和性别认同方面都不存在 DIF。年龄较大的参与者(相对于年龄较小的参与者)、男性(相对于女性)和体重指数较低的参与者(相对于体重指数较高的参与者)的 FAS 分数较高。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即 FAS 测量的是这些国家群体和受访者特征中共同的基本结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement invariance and differential item functioning of the functionality appreciation scale (FAS) in Colombia and Spain

The Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS) is increasingly used in diverse national and linguistic contexts. However, limited work has assessed the extent to which the instrument demonstrates measurement invariance and differential item functioning (DIF) across nations and respondent characteristics. Here, we examined measurement invariance and DIF of the FAS using archival data from adults in Colombia (Mebarak et al., 2023) and Spain (Zamora et al., 2024). Participants included 1420 (women n = 804, men n = 616) respondents from Colombia and 838 (women n = 415, men n = 423) respondents from Spain who completed translations of the FAS. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure of the FAS in both national groups. Additionally, the FAS achieved full measurement invariance (up to latent mean invariance) across both groups. We also found that the FAS lacked DIF as a function of age, body mass index (BMI), and gender identity across both national groups. Older participants (relative to younger participants), men (relative to women), and participants with lower BMIs (relative to those with higher BMIs) had higher FAS scores. These results support the notion that the FAS is measuring a common underlying construct across these national groups and respondent characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Body Image
Body Image Multiple-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
28.80%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Body Image is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, scientific articles on body image and human physical appearance. Body Image is a multi-faceted concept that refers to persons perceptions and attitudes about their own body, particularly but not exclusively its appearance. The journal invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines-psychological science, other social and behavioral sciences, and medical and health sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, theoretical and review papers, and science-based practitioner reports of interest. Dissertation abstracts are also published online, and the journal gives an annual award for the best doctoral dissertation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信