使用随机生存林算法预测混交林的采伐时间

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Dinuka Madhushan Senevirathne , Sheng-I Yang , Consuelo Brandeis , Donald G. Hodges
{"title":"使用随机生存林算法预测混交林的采伐时间","authors":"Dinuka Madhushan Senevirathne ,&nbsp;Sheng-I Yang ,&nbsp;Consuelo Brandeis ,&nbsp;Donald G. Hodges","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Survival analysis is composed of a group of analytical approaches that can be used to predict the occurrence of harvest activities, which provides insightful information about the dynamics of natural resources utilization in a region. Recently, random survival forest (RSF) has been proposed in survival analysis to capture the complex relationships among variables. The main objective of this study was to employ the RSF algorithm to examine the temporal evolution of tree harvest, accounting for stand and environmental variables. Specifically, the predictability of the RSF model was compared with the Cox proportional hazard (Cox) model, a popular model in survival analysis. Important variables in explaining the variation of harvest time were identified. Data collected by the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program from permanent plots in the southern Appalachian region were utilized in the analysis. Results showed that the RSF model consistently outperformed the Cox model based on prediction accuracy. Among 14 variables examined, ownership, forest type, elevation, state, and slope emerged as most important. Utilizing only these five variables in a reduced model produced satisfactory prediction accuracy compared to the full model (i.e., the models with all variables included). The findings of this work provide insights for forest managers and policy makers to utilize survival analysis methods in understanding harvest activities at the regional scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000721/pdfft?md5=6ead7827de7a41d9a140180c17125890&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000721-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting time-to-harvest in mixed-species forests using a random survival forest algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Dinuka Madhushan Senevirathne ,&nbsp;Sheng-I Yang ,&nbsp;Consuelo Brandeis ,&nbsp;Donald G. Hodges\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Survival analysis is composed of a group of analytical approaches that can be used to predict the occurrence of harvest activities, which provides insightful information about the dynamics of natural resources utilization in a region. Recently, random survival forest (RSF) has been proposed in survival analysis to capture the complex relationships among variables. The main objective of this study was to employ the RSF algorithm to examine the temporal evolution of tree harvest, accounting for stand and environmental variables. Specifically, the predictability of the RSF model was compared with the Cox proportional hazard (Cox) model, a popular model in survival analysis. Important variables in explaining the variation of harvest time were identified. Data collected by the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program from permanent plots in the southern Appalachian region were utilized in the analysis. Results showed that the RSF model consistently outperformed the Cox model based on prediction accuracy. Among 14 variables examined, ownership, forest type, elevation, state, and slope emerged as most important. Utilizing only these five variables in a reduced model produced satisfactory prediction accuracy compared to the full model (i.e., the models with all variables included). The findings of this work provide insights for forest managers and policy makers to utilize survival analysis methods in understanding harvest activities at the regional scale.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000721/pdfft?md5=6ead7827de7a41d9a140180c17125890&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000721-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生存分析由一组分析方法组成,可用于预测收获活动的发生,从而提供有关一个地区自然资源利用动态的有洞察力的信息。最近,生存分析中提出了随机生存林(RSF)来捕捉变量之间的复杂关系。本研究的主要目的是采用 RSF 算法,在考虑林分和环境变量的情况下,研究树木采伐的时间演变。具体而言,将 RSF 模型的可预测性与生存分析中常用的 Cox 比例危险(Cox)模型进行了比较。确定了解释采伐时间变化的重要变量。美国农业部林业局森林资源调查与分析 (FIA) 计划从阿巴拉契亚南部地区的永久性地块收集的数据被用于分析。结果表明,RSF 模型的预测准确性一直优于 Cox 模型。在研究的 14 个变量中,所有权、森林类型、海拔高度、状态和坡度最为重要。与完整模型(即包含所有变量的模型)相比,在简化模型中仅使用这五个变量就能获得令人满意的预测准确性。这项工作的发现为森林管理者和政策制定者利用生存分析方法了解区域范围内的采伐活动提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting time-to-harvest in mixed-species forests using a random survival forest algorithm

Survival analysis is composed of a group of analytical approaches that can be used to predict the occurrence of harvest activities, which provides insightful information about the dynamics of natural resources utilization in a region. Recently, random survival forest (RSF) has been proposed in survival analysis to capture the complex relationships among variables. The main objective of this study was to employ the RSF algorithm to examine the temporal evolution of tree harvest, accounting for stand and environmental variables. Specifically, the predictability of the RSF model was compared with the Cox proportional hazard (Cox) model, a popular model in survival analysis. Important variables in explaining the variation of harvest time were identified. Data collected by the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program from permanent plots in the southern Appalachian region were utilized in the analysis. Results showed that the RSF model consistently outperformed the Cox model based on prediction accuracy. Among 14 variables examined, ownership, forest type, elevation, state, and slope emerged as most important. Utilizing only these five variables in a reduced model produced satisfactory prediction accuracy compared to the full model (i.e., the models with all variables included). The findings of this work provide insights for forest managers and policy makers to utilize survival analysis methods in understanding harvest activities at the regional scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信