关于学龄儿童健康行为调查中 "体型认知 "项目的收敛性、判别性和并发有效性的跨国研究

IF 3.8 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Manon Rouche , Thérésa Lebacq , Anna Dzielska , Colette Kelly , Saoirse Nic Gabhainn , Caroline Mertens , Katia Castetbon
{"title":"关于学龄儿童健康行为调查中 \"体型认知 \"项目的收敛性、判别性和并发有效性的跨国研究","authors":"Manon Rouche ,&nbsp;Thérésa Lebacq ,&nbsp;Anna Dzielska ,&nbsp;Colette Kelly ,&nbsp;Saoirse Nic Gabhainn ,&nbsp;Caroline Mertens ,&nbsp;Katia Castetbon","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite its significant usefulness in adolescent health studies, the single-item “body size perception” question, developed within the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey, has yet to undergo multidimensional validation.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the convergent, divergent and concurrent validity of the HBSC body size perception question among adolescents.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The single-item HBSC body size perception question is as follows: “Do you think your body is…?,” with answers ranging from “much too thin” to “much too fat.” Fifteen-year-old participants included in the analysis were 72,086 from 45 HBSC countries in 2017/18 (concurrent validity), and 595, 127, and 615 in 2021/22 in French-speaking Belgium, Ireland, and Poland, respectively. The convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity was assessed with body dissatisfaction, social desirability, and selfesteem, respectively. The concurrent validity was also examined with body mass index (BMI) from the 2017/18 HBSC data. All analyses were sex-stratified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cohen’s Kappa values were 0.67 [confidence interval (CI): 95%: 0.62, 0.72] and 0.64 (0.59, 0.69) for boys and girls, respectively, in all 3 countries together. Body size perception was associated with social desirability, selfesteem, and BMI, with a stronger association in girls than that in boys. For instance, girls with higher social desirability were less likely to perceive themselves as “too thin” [Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) = 0.78 (0.69, 0.89)] rather than as the “right size.” Boys with higher selfesteem were less likely to perceive themselves as “too fat” [0.93 (0.90, 0.97)] rather than the “right size.” Girls with underweight were less likely to perceive themselves as “too fat” [0.38 (0.34, 043)] rather than “right size” and girls with overweight/obesity were more likely to perceive themselves as such [8.19 (7.49, 8.95)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The single-item HBSC body size perception question demonstrated good convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity. It reflects adolescents’ own perception of body size, possibly influenced by societal norms and ideals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"8 9","pages":"Article 104445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124023795/pdfft?md5=c20036509d17d09d0bcee9033cbd4634&pid=1-s2.0-S2475299124023795-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-National Study on the Convergent, Discriminant, and Concurrent Validity of the “Body Size Perception” Item in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey\",\"authors\":\"Manon Rouche ,&nbsp;Thérésa Lebacq ,&nbsp;Anna Dzielska ,&nbsp;Colette Kelly ,&nbsp;Saoirse Nic Gabhainn ,&nbsp;Caroline Mertens ,&nbsp;Katia Castetbon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite its significant usefulness in adolescent health studies, the single-item “body size perception” question, developed within the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey, has yet to undergo multidimensional validation.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the convergent, divergent and concurrent validity of the HBSC body size perception question among adolescents.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The single-item HBSC body size perception question is as follows: “Do you think your body is…?,” with answers ranging from “much too thin” to “much too fat.” Fifteen-year-old participants included in the analysis were 72,086 from 45 HBSC countries in 2017/18 (concurrent validity), and 595, 127, and 615 in 2021/22 in French-speaking Belgium, Ireland, and Poland, respectively. The convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity was assessed with body dissatisfaction, social desirability, and selfesteem, respectively. The concurrent validity was also examined with body mass index (BMI) from the 2017/18 HBSC data. All analyses were sex-stratified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cohen’s Kappa values were 0.67 [confidence interval (CI): 95%: 0.62, 0.72] and 0.64 (0.59, 0.69) for boys and girls, respectively, in all 3 countries together. Body size perception was associated with social desirability, selfesteem, and BMI, with a stronger association in girls than that in boys. For instance, girls with higher social desirability were less likely to perceive themselves as “too thin” [Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) = 0.78 (0.69, 0.89)] rather than as the “right size.” Boys with higher selfesteem were less likely to perceive themselves as “too fat” [0.93 (0.90, 0.97)] rather than the “right size.” Girls with underweight were less likely to perceive themselves as “too fat” [0.38 (0.34, 043)] rather than “right size” and girls with overweight/obesity were more likely to perceive themselves as such [8.19 (7.49, 8.95)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The single-item HBSC body size perception question demonstrated good convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity. It reflects adolescents’ own perception of body size, possibly influenced by societal norms and ideals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"8 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 104445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124023795/pdfft?md5=c20036509d17d09d0bcee9033cbd4634&pid=1-s2.0-S2475299124023795-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124023795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124023795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管 "体型感知 "单项问题在青少年健康研究中非常有用,但该问题是在学龄儿童健康行为调查(HBSC)中开发出来的,尚未经过多维验证。方法HBSC体型感知单项问题如下:"您认为您的身材好吗?"你认为自己的身体......吗?",答案范围从 "太瘦 "到 "太胖"。纳入分析的 15 岁参与者中,2017/18 年度有来自 45 个 HBSC 国家的 72086 人(同时有效性),2021/22 年度在比利时法语区、爱尔兰和波兰分别有 595 人、127 人和 615 人。对身体不满意度、社会期望值和自尊分别进行了收敛效度、发散效度和并发效度评估。同时效度还与2017/18年度HBSC数据中的身体质量指数(BMI)进行了检验。所有分析均按性别进行了分层。结果在所有3个国家中,男生和女生的Cohen's Kappa值分别为0.67[置信区间(CI):95%:0.62,0.72]和0.64(0.59,0.69)。体型感知与社会期望值、自尊和体重指数有关,女孩的相关性比男孩强。例如,社会期望值较高的女孩不太可能认为自己 "太瘦"[相对风险比(RRR)= 0.78 (0.69, 0.89)],而不是 "体型合适"。自尊心较强的男孩认为自己 "太胖"[0.93(0.90,0.97)]而不是 "体型合适 "的可能性较小。体重不足的女孩认为自己 "太胖"[0.38 (0.34, 043)]而不是 "体型合适 "的可能性较小,而超重/肥胖的女孩认为自己 "太胖"[8.19 (7.49, 8.95)]的可能性较大。它反映了青少年自己对体型的看法,可能受到了社会规范和理想的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-National Study on the Convergent, Discriminant, and Concurrent Validity of the “Body Size Perception” Item in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey

Background

Despite its significant usefulness in adolescent health studies, the single-item “body size perception” question, developed within the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey, has yet to undergo multidimensional validation.

Objectives

To assess the convergent, divergent and concurrent validity of the HBSC body size perception question among adolescents.

Methods

The single-item HBSC body size perception question is as follows: “Do you think your body is…?,” with answers ranging from “much too thin” to “much too fat.” Fifteen-year-old participants included in the analysis were 72,086 from 45 HBSC countries in 2017/18 (concurrent validity), and 595, 127, and 615 in 2021/22 in French-speaking Belgium, Ireland, and Poland, respectively. The convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity was assessed with body dissatisfaction, social desirability, and selfesteem, respectively. The concurrent validity was also examined with body mass index (BMI) from the 2017/18 HBSC data. All analyses were sex-stratified.

Results

Cohen’s Kappa values were 0.67 [confidence interval (CI): 95%: 0.62, 0.72] and 0.64 (0.59, 0.69) for boys and girls, respectively, in all 3 countries together. Body size perception was associated with social desirability, selfesteem, and BMI, with a stronger association in girls than that in boys. For instance, girls with higher social desirability were less likely to perceive themselves as “too thin” [Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) = 0.78 (0.69, 0.89)] rather than as the “right size.” Boys with higher selfesteem were less likely to perceive themselves as “too fat” [0.93 (0.90, 0.97)] rather than the “right size.” Girls with underweight were less likely to perceive themselves as “too fat” [0.38 (0.34, 043)] rather than “right size” and girls with overweight/obesity were more likely to perceive themselves as such [8.19 (7.49, 8.95)].

Conclusions

The single-item HBSC body size perception question demonstrated good convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity. It reflects adolescents’ own perception of body size, possibly influenced by societal norms and ideals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信