Valerie A. van Ingen-Buijs , Anouk C. van Westerhoven , Petros Skiadas , Xander C.L. Zuijdgeest , Sajeet Haridas , Christopher Daum , Kecia Duffy , Jie Guo , Hope Hundley , Kurt LaButti , Anna Lipzen , Jasmyn Pangilinan , Robert Riley , Jie Wang , Mi Yan , Francis Martin , Kerrie Barry , Igor V. Grigoriev , Johannes Z. Groenewald , Pedro W. Crous , Michael F. Seidl
{"title":"根据系统发生组分析,Phyllosticta paracitricarpa 与欧盟检疫真菌 P. Citricarpa 同源。","authors":"Valerie A. van Ingen-Buijs , Anouk C. van Westerhoven , Petros Skiadas , Xander C.L. Zuijdgeest , Sajeet Haridas , Christopher Daum , Kecia Duffy , Jie Guo , Hope Hundley , Kurt LaButti , Anna Lipzen , Jasmyn Pangilinan , Robert Riley , Jie Wang , Mi Yan , Francis Martin , Kerrie Barry , Igor V. Grigoriev , Johannes Z. Groenewald , Pedro W. Crous , Michael F. Seidl","doi":"10.1016/j.fgb.2024.103925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Phyllosticta citricarpa</em> is an important citrus-pathogen and a quarantine organism in the European Union. Its recently described relative, <em>P. paracitricarpa</em>, is very closely related and not listed as a quarantine organism. <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> is very difficult to distinguish from <em>P. citricarpa</em>, since its morphological features overlap and the barcoding gene sequences that were originally used to delimit them as distinct species have a low number of species-specific polymorphisms that have subsequently been shown to overlap between the two clades. Therefore, we performed extensive genomic analyses to determine whether the genetic variation between <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> strains should be considered to represent infraspecific variation within <em>P. citricarpa</em>, or whether it is indicative of distinct species. Using a phylogenomic analysis with 3,000 single copy ortholog genes and whole-genome comparisons, we determined that the variation between <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> can be considered as infraspecies variation within <em>P. citricarpa</em>. We also determined the level of variation in mitochondrial assemblies of several <em>Phyllosticta</em> species and concluded there are only minimal differences between the assemblies of <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em>. Thus, using several orthogonal approaches, we here demonstrate that variation within the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of other <em>Phyllosticta</em> species is larger than variation between genomes obtained from <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> strains. Thus, <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> should be considered as conspecific.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55135,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Genetics and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087184524000628/pdfft?md5=551c0118874a22b2fde3b8d86173256b&pid=1-s2.0-S1087184524000628-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phyllosticta paracitricarpa is synonymous with the EU quarantine fungus P. citricarpa based on phylogenomic analyses\",\"authors\":\"Valerie A. van Ingen-Buijs , Anouk C. van Westerhoven , Petros Skiadas , Xander C.L. Zuijdgeest , Sajeet Haridas , Christopher Daum , Kecia Duffy , Jie Guo , Hope Hundley , Kurt LaButti , Anna Lipzen , Jasmyn Pangilinan , Robert Riley , Jie Wang , Mi Yan , Francis Martin , Kerrie Barry , Igor V. Grigoriev , Johannes Z. Groenewald , Pedro W. Crous , Michael F. Seidl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fgb.2024.103925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Phyllosticta citricarpa</em> is an important citrus-pathogen and a quarantine organism in the European Union. Its recently described relative, <em>P. paracitricarpa</em>, is very closely related and not listed as a quarantine organism. <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> is very difficult to distinguish from <em>P. citricarpa</em>, since its morphological features overlap and the barcoding gene sequences that were originally used to delimit them as distinct species have a low number of species-specific polymorphisms that have subsequently been shown to overlap between the two clades. Therefore, we performed extensive genomic analyses to determine whether the genetic variation between <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> strains should be considered to represent infraspecific variation within <em>P. citricarpa</em>, or whether it is indicative of distinct species. Using a phylogenomic analysis with 3,000 single copy ortholog genes and whole-genome comparisons, we determined that the variation between <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> can be considered as infraspecies variation within <em>P. citricarpa</em>. We also determined the level of variation in mitochondrial assemblies of several <em>Phyllosticta</em> species and concluded there are only minimal differences between the assemblies of <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em>. Thus, using several orthogonal approaches, we here demonstrate that variation within the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of other <em>Phyllosticta</em> species is larger than variation between genomes obtained from <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> strains. Thus, <em>P. citricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracitricarpa</em> should be considered as conspecific.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal Genetics and Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087184524000628/pdfft?md5=551c0118874a22b2fde3b8d86173256b&pid=1-s2.0-S1087184524000628-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal Genetics and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087184524000628\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Genetics and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087184524000628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Phyllosticta citricarpa 是一种重要的柑橘病原体,也是欧盟的一种检疫生物。它最近描述的近亲 P. paracitricarpa 与它关系密切,但未被列为检疫生物。P. paracitricarpa 与 P. citricarpa 很难区分,因为它们的形态特征相互重叠,而且最初用于将它们划分为不同物种的条形码基因序列具有较少的物种特异性多态性,这些多态性随后被证明在两个支系之间重叠。因此,我们进行了广泛的基因组分析,以确定 P. citricarpa 和 P. paracitricarpa 菌株之间的遗传变异是否应被视为 P. citricarpa 内部的种下变异,或者是否表明了不同的物种。通过使用 3,000 个单拷贝直向同源基因和全基因组比较进行系统发生组分析,我们确定了 P. citricarpa 和 P. paracitricarpa 之间的变异可被视为 P. citricarpa 的种下变异。我们还确定了几个 Phyllosticta 物种线粒体组合的变异水平,并得出结论:P. citricarpa 和 P. paracitricarpa 的线粒体组合差异很小。因此,我们在此使用几种正交方法证明,其他 Phyllosticta 物种的核基因组和线粒体基因组内的变异大于从 P. citricarpa 和 P. paracitricarpa 菌株中获得的基因组之间的变异。因此,P. citricarpa 和 P. paracitricarpa 应被视为同种。
Phyllosticta paracitricarpa is synonymous with the EU quarantine fungus P. citricarpa based on phylogenomic analyses
Phyllosticta citricarpa is an important citrus-pathogen and a quarantine organism in the European Union. Its recently described relative, P. paracitricarpa, is very closely related and not listed as a quarantine organism. P. paracitricarpa is very difficult to distinguish from P. citricarpa, since its morphological features overlap and the barcoding gene sequences that were originally used to delimit them as distinct species have a low number of species-specific polymorphisms that have subsequently been shown to overlap between the two clades. Therefore, we performed extensive genomic analyses to determine whether the genetic variation between P. citricarpa and P. paracitricarpa strains should be considered to represent infraspecific variation within P. citricarpa, or whether it is indicative of distinct species. Using a phylogenomic analysis with 3,000 single copy ortholog genes and whole-genome comparisons, we determined that the variation between P. citricarpa and P. paracitricarpa can be considered as infraspecies variation within P. citricarpa. We also determined the level of variation in mitochondrial assemblies of several Phyllosticta species and concluded there are only minimal differences between the assemblies of P. citricarpa and P. paracitricarpa. Thus, using several orthogonal approaches, we here demonstrate that variation within the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of other Phyllosticta species is larger than variation between genomes obtained from P. citricarpa and P. paracitricarpa strains. Thus, P. citricarpa and P. paracitricarpa should be considered as conspecific.
期刊介绍:
Fungal Genetics and Biology, formerly known as Experimental Mycology, publishes experimental investigations of fungi and their traditional allies that relate structure and function to growth, reproduction, morphogenesis, and differentiation. This journal especially welcomes studies of gene organization and expression and of developmental processes at the cellular, subcellular, and molecular levels. The journal also includes suitable experimental inquiries into fungal cytology, biochemistry, physiology, genetics, and phylogeny.
Fungal Genetics and Biology publishes basic research conducted by mycologists, cell biologists, biochemists, geneticists, and molecular biologists.
Research Areas include:
• Biochemistry
• Cytology
• Developmental biology
• Evolutionary biology
• Genetics
• Molecular biology
• Phylogeny
• Physiology.