{"title":"\"CT 放射组学在肺癌脑转移中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析\"。","authors":"Ting Li, Tian Gan, Jingting Wang, Yun Long, Kemeng Zhang, Meiyan Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to systematically assess the quality and performance of computed tomography (CT) radiomics studies in predicting brain metastasis (BM) among patients with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies predicting BM in patients with lung cancer using CT-based radiomics features. Information regarding patients, imaging, and radiomics analysis was extracted from eligible studies. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Radiomics Quality Scoring (RQS) tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A meta-analysis of studies regarding the prediction of BM in patients with lung cancer was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 75 to 602. The mean RQS of the studies was 12 (range 9–16), and the corresponding percentage of the score was 33.55 % (range 25.00–44.44 %). Four studies (30.8 %) were considered as low risk of bias, while the remaining nine studies (69.2 %) were considered to have unclear risks. The meta-analysis included twelve studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and Area Under the Curve (AUC) value with 95 % confidence intervals were 0.75 [0.69, 0.80], 0.76 [0.68, 0.82], and 0.81 [0.77–0.84], respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CT radiomics-based models show promising results as a non-invasive method to predict BM in lung cancer patients. However, multicenter and prospective studies are warranted to enhance the stability and acceptance of radiomics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 110275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Application of CT radiomics in brain metastasis of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”\",\"authors\":\"Ting Li, Tian Gan, Jingting Wang, Yun Long, Kemeng Zhang, Meiyan Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to systematically assess the quality and performance of computed tomography (CT) radiomics studies in predicting brain metastasis (BM) among patients with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies predicting BM in patients with lung cancer using CT-based radiomics features. Information regarding patients, imaging, and radiomics analysis was extracted from eligible studies. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Radiomics Quality Scoring (RQS) tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A meta-analysis of studies regarding the prediction of BM in patients with lung cancer was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 75 to 602. The mean RQS of the studies was 12 (range 9–16), and the corresponding percentage of the score was 33.55 % (range 25.00–44.44 %). Four studies (30.8 %) were considered as low risk of bias, while the remaining nine studies (69.2 %) were considered to have unclear risks. The meta-analysis included twelve studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and Area Under the Curve (AUC) value with 95 % confidence intervals were 0.75 [0.69, 0.80], 0.76 [0.68, 0.82], and 0.81 [0.77–0.84], respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CT radiomics-based models show promising results as a non-invasive method to predict BM in lung cancer patients. However, multicenter and prospective studies are warranted to enhance the stability and acceptance of radiomics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Application of CT radiomics in brain metastasis of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”
Purpose
This study aimed to systematically assess the quality and performance of computed tomography (CT) radiomics studies in predicting brain metastasis (BM) among patients with lung cancer.
Methods
The PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies predicting BM in patients with lung cancer using CT-based radiomics features. Information regarding patients, imaging, and radiomics analysis was extracted from eligible studies. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Radiomics Quality Scoring (RQS) tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A meta-analysis of studies regarding the prediction of BM in patients with lung cancer was performed.
Results
Thirteen studies were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 75 to 602. The mean RQS of the studies was 12 (range 9–16), and the corresponding percentage of the score was 33.55 % (range 25.00–44.44 %). Four studies (30.8 %) were considered as low risk of bias, while the remaining nine studies (69.2 %) were considered to have unclear risks. The meta-analysis included twelve studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and Area Under the Curve (AUC) value with 95 % confidence intervals were 0.75 [0.69, 0.80], 0.76 [0.68, 0.82], and 0.81 [0.77–0.84], respectively.
Conclusion
CT radiomics-based models show promising results as a non-invasive method to predict BM in lung cancer patients. However, multicenter and prospective studies are warranted to enhance the stability and acceptance of radiomics.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology