"CT 放射组学在肺癌脑转移中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析"。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"\"CT 放射组学在肺癌脑转移中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析\"。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to systematically assess the quality and performance of computed tomography (CT) radiomics studies in predicting brain metastasis (BM) among patients with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies predicting BM in patients with lung cancer using CT-based radiomics features. Information regarding patients, imaging, and radiomics analysis was extracted from eligible studies. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Radiomics Quality Scoring (RQS) tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A meta-analysis of studies regarding the prediction of BM in patients with lung cancer was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 75 to 602. The mean RQS of the studies was 12 (range 9–16), and the corresponding percentage of the score was 33.55 % (range 25.00–44.44 %). Four studies (30.8 %) were considered as low risk of bias, while the remaining nine studies (69.2 %) were considered to have unclear risks. The meta-analysis included twelve studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and Area Under the Curve (AUC) value with 95 % confidence intervals were 0.75 [0.69, 0.80], 0.76 [0.68, 0.82], and 0.81 [0.77–0.84], respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CT radiomics-based models show promising results as a non-invasive method to predict BM in lung cancer patients. However, multicenter and prospective studies are warranted to enhance the stability and acceptance of radiomics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Application of CT radiomics in brain metastasis of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to systematically assess the quality and performance of computed tomography (CT) radiomics studies in predicting brain metastasis (BM) among patients with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies predicting BM in patients with lung cancer using CT-based radiomics features. Information regarding patients, imaging, and radiomics analysis was extracted from eligible studies. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Radiomics Quality Scoring (RQS) tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A meta-analysis of studies regarding the prediction of BM in patients with lung cancer was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 75 to 602. The mean RQS of the studies was 12 (range 9–16), and the corresponding percentage of the score was 33.55 % (range 25.00–44.44 %). Four studies (30.8 %) were considered as low risk of bias, while the remaining nine studies (69.2 %) were considered to have unclear risks. The meta-analysis included twelve studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and Area Under the Curve (AUC) value with 95 % confidence intervals were 0.75 [0.69, 0.80], 0.76 [0.68, 0.82], and 0.81 [0.77–0.84], respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CT radiomics-based models show promising results as a non-invasive method to predict BM in lung cancer patients. However, multicenter and prospective studies are warranted to enhance the stability and acceptance of radiomics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在系统评估计算机断层扫描(CT)放射组学研究在预测肺癌患者脑转移(BM)方面的质量和性能:方法:在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science上搜索使用基于CT的放射组学特征预测肺癌患者脑转移的研究。从符合条件的研究中提取有关患者、成像和放射组学分析的信息。我们使用放射组学质量评分(RQS)工具和诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)对纳入研究的质量进行了评估。对有关肺癌患者BM预测的研究进行了荟萃分析:结果:共发现 13 项研究,样本量从 75 到 602 不等。研究的平均 RQS 为 12(范围为 9-16),相应的得分百分比为 33.55%(范围为 25.00-44.44%)。四项研究(30.8%)被认为存在低偏倚风险,其余九项研究(69.2%)被认为存在不明确的风险。荟萃分析包括 12 项研究。汇总的灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)值(95% 置信区间)分别为 0.75 [0.69,0.80]、0.76 [0.68,0.82] 和 0.81 [0.77-0.84]:基于 CT 放射组学的模型作为预测肺癌患者 BM 的无创方法,显示出良好的效果。然而,为了提高放射组学的稳定性和可接受性,还需要进行多中心和前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Application of CT radiomics in brain metastasis of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”

Purpose

This study aimed to systematically assess the quality and performance of computed tomography (CT) radiomics studies in predicting brain metastasis (BM) among patients with lung cancer.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies predicting BM in patients with lung cancer using CT-based radiomics features. Information regarding patients, imaging, and radiomics analysis was extracted from eligible studies. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Radiomics Quality Scoring (RQS) tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A meta-analysis of studies regarding the prediction of BM in patients with lung cancer was performed.

Results

Thirteen studies were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 75 to 602. The mean RQS of the studies was 12 (range 9–16), and the corresponding percentage of the score was 33.55 % (range 25.00–44.44 %). Four studies (30.8 %) were considered as low risk of bias, while the remaining nine studies (69.2 %) were considered to have unclear risks. The meta-analysis included twelve studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and Area Under the Curve (AUC) value with 95 % confidence intervals were 0.75 [0.69, 0.80], 0.76 [0.68, 0.82], and 0.81 [0.77–0.84], respectively.

Conclusion

CT radiomics-based models show promising results as a non-invasive method to predict BM in lung cancer patients. However, multicenter and prospective studies are warranted to enhance the stability and acceptance of radiomics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信