{"title":"哈利法克斯躯体症状障碍试验:急诊科短期强化动态心理治疗试点随机对照试验。","authors":"Joel M. Town , Allan Abbass , Samuel Campbell","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients commonly present at hospital Emergency Departments (ED) with distress that meet criteria for a Somatic Symptom and Related Disorder (SSRD). Without access to effective treatment, risk of ongoing patient disability and further ED visits is high.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This pilot trial used a randomized parallel group design to test the efficacy of Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy (ISTDP). ED patients who met criteria for SSRD were recruited. The effects of ISTDP plus medical care as usual (MCAU) were judged through comparison against 8 weeks of MCAU plus wait-list symptom monitoring (WL-SM). The primary outcome was somatic symptom at 8 weeks. Patients allocated to WL-SM could cross-over to receive ISTDP and 6-month follow-up data was collected. Baseline measures of patient attachment style and alexithymia were collected to examine vulnerabilities to somatic symptoms. <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>: <span><span>NCT02076867</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-seven patients were randomized to 2 groups (ISTDP = 19 and WL-SM = 18). Multi-level modelling showed that change over time on somatic symptoms was significantly greater in the ISTDP group. Between-group differences were large at 8 weeks (Cohen's <em>d</em> = 0.94) and increased by end of treatment (Cohen's <em>d</em> = 1.54). Observed differences in symptoms of depression and illness anxiety were also large, favoring ISTDP, and effects were maintained at follow-up. Patients receiving ISTDP had reduced ED service utilization at 2-year follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ISTDP appears an efficacious treatment for SSRD and a larger randomized trial is justified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 111889"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Halifax somatic symptom disorder trial: A pilot randomized controlled trial of intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Joel M. Town , Allan Abbass , Samuel Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients commonly present at hospital Emergency Departments (ED) with distress that meet criteria for a Somatic Symptom and Related Disorder (SSRD). Without access to effective treatment, risk of ongoing patient disability and further ED visits is high.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This pilot trial used a randomized parallel group design to test the efficacy of Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy (ISTDP). ED patients who met criteria for SSRD were recruited. The effects of ISTDP plus medical care as usual (MCAU) were judged through comparison against 8 weeks of MCAU plus wait-list symptom monitoring (WL-SM). The primary outcome was somatic symptom at 8 weeks. Patients allocated to WL-SM could cross-over to receive ISTDP and 6-month follow-up data was collected. Baseline measures of patient attachment style and alexithymia were collected to examine vulnerabilities to somatic symptoms. <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>: <span><span>NCT02076867</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-seven patients were randomized to 2 groups (ISTDP = 19 and WL-SM = 18). Multi-level modelling showed that change over time on somatic symptoms was significantly greater in the ISTDP group. Between-group differences were large at 8 weeks (Cohen's <em>d</em> = 0.94) and increased by end of treatment (Cohen's <em>d</em> = 1.54). Observed differences in symptoms of depression and illness anxiety were also large, favoring ISTDP, and effects were maintained at follow-up. Patients receiving ISTDP had reduced ED service utilization at 2-year follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ISTDP appears an efficacious treatment for SSRD and a larger randomized trial is justified.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在医院急诊科(ED)就诊的患者通常都有符合躯体症状及相关障碍(SSRD)标准的困扰。如果得不到有效治疗,患者持续致残和进一步到急诊科就诊的风险很高:这项试点试验采用随机平行分组设计,以测试短期强化动态心理疗法(ISTDP)的疗效。试验招募了符合 SSRD 标准的急诊室患者。通过与为期8周的常规医疗护理(MCAU)和候补症状监测(WL-SM)进行比较,判断ISTDP和常规医疗护理(MCAU)的效果。主要结果是 8 周后的躯体症状。接受 WL-SM 治疗的患者可交叉接受 ISTDP 治疗,并收集 6 个月的随访数据。此外,还收集了患者依恋风格和情感障碍的基线测量数据,以检查患者对躯体症状的易感性:NCT02076867.结果:37名患者被随机分为两组(ISTDP=19和WL-SM=18)。多层次建模显示,ISTDP组躯体症状随时间的变化明显更大。8 周时,组间差异较大(Cohen's d = 0.94),治疗结束时,组间差异有所扩大(Cohen's d = 1.54)。抑郁症状和疾病焦虑的观察差异也很大,有利于 ISTDP,而且效果在随访中保持不变。接受ISTDP治疗的患者在2年的随访中减少了对急诊室服务的使用:ISTDP似乎是一种治疗SSRD的有效方法,有理由进行更大规模的随机试验。
Halifax somatic symptom disorder trial: A pilot randomized controlled trial of intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy in the emergency department
Background
Patients commonly present at hospital Emergency Departments (ED) with distress that meet criteria for a Somatic Symptom and Related Disorder (SSRD). Without access to effective treatment, risk of ongoing patient disability and further ED visits is high.
Method
This pilot trial used a randomized parallel group design to test the efficacy of Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy (ISTDP). ED patients who met criteria for SSRD were recruited. The effects of ISTDP plus medical care as usual (MCAU) were judged through comparison against 8 weeks of MCAU plus wait-list symptom monitoring (WL-SM). The primary outcome was somatic symptom at 8 weeks. Patients allocated to WL-SM could cross-over to receive ISTDP and 6-month follow-up data was collected. Baseline measures of patient attachment style and alexithymia were collected to examine vulnerabilities to somatic symptoms. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02076867.
Results
Thirty-seven patients were randomized to 2 groups (ISTDP = 19 and WL-SM = 18). Multi-level modelling showed that change over time on somatic symptoms was significantly greater in the ISTDP group. Between-group differences were large at 8 weeks (Cohen's d = 0.94) and increased by end of treatment (Cohen's d = 1.54). Observed differences in symptoms of depression and illness anxiety were also large, favoring ISTDP, and effects were maintained at follow-up. Patients receiving ISTDP had reduced ED service utilization at 2-year follow-up.
Conclusions
ISTDP appears an efficacious treatment for SSRD and a larger randomized trial is justified.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.