通过 Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 的光学相干断层扫描模式和光学相干断层血管造影模式获取的糖尿病患者黄斑厚度的比较。

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
{"title":"通过 Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 的光学相干断层扫描模式和光学相干断层血管造影模式获取的糖尿病患者黄斑厚度的比较。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare macular thickness obtained using two different modes of image acquisitions with Cirrus HD-OCT 5000.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with diabetes were recruited and macular thickness were obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT) mode and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) mode. The OCT mode involved a Macular Cube (512×128 pixels) centred on the fovea covering a 6 × 6 mm<sup>2</sup> macular region. The OCTA acquisition involved scanning of a 6 × 6 mm² scan (350×350 pixels) centred on the fovea. Data was exported and compared according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) subfields. Fixation deviation was defined as the deviation of the foveal point from the grid center in the OCT scan and OCTA scan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-six diabetic patients were recruited had similar macular thickness in all ETDRS subfield except the superior outer sector. The 95 % limits of agreement between the two modes were within 9.7μm to -9.0μm. It took longer to complete each OCTA mode (median of 7.4 s) than the OCT mode (median time of 5.8 s) (Wilcoxon test, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), but OCTA generated a smaller fixation deviation (median 68.8μm) than the OCT mode (median 103.0μm) (Wilcoxon test, <em>p</em> = 0.014).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Improved fixation in OCTA compared with OCT was evident, likely because of the faster scanning speed and higher sampling density of OCTA. Macular thickness was found similar. There appears no requirement to obtain macular thickness measurements using a separate OCT mode. This approach can reduce patient chair time, improve patient comfort, and streamline the clinical workflow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000074/pdfft?md5=3963b1936e4edd53c5b45bf47cbf4152&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429624000074-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of macular thickness in diabetic patients acquired from optical coherence tomography mode and optical coherence tomography angiography mode in Cirrus HD-OCT 5000\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare macular thickness obtained using two different modes of image acquisitions with Cirrus HD-OCT 5000.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with diabetes were recruited and macular thickness were obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT) mode and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) mode. The OCT mode involved a Macular Cube (512×128 pixels) centred on the fovea covering a 6 × 6 mm<sup>2</sup> macular region. The OCTA acquisition involved scanning of a 6 × 6 mm² scan (350×350 pixels) centred on the fovea. Data was exported and compared according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) subfields. Fixation deviation was defined as the deviation of the foveal point from the grid center in the OCT scan and OCTA scan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-six diabetic patients were recruited had similar macular thickness in all ETDRS subfield except the superior outer sector. The 95 % limits of agreement between the two modes were within 9.7μm to -9.0μm. It took longer to complete each OCTA mode (median of 7.4 s) than the OCT mode (median time of 5.8 s) (Wilcoxon test, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), but OCTA generated a smaller fixation deviation (median 68.8μm) than the OCT mode (median 103.0μm) (Wilcoxon test, <em>p</em> = 0.014).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Improved fixation in OCTA compared with OCT was evident, likely because of the faster scanning speed and higher sampling density of OCTA. Macular thickness was found similar. There appears no requirement to obtain macular thickness measurements using a separate OCT mode. This approach can reduce patient chair time, improve patient comfort, and streamline the clinical workflow.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000074/pdfft?md5=3963b1936e4edd53c5b45bf47cbf4152&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429624000074-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较使用 Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 的两种不同图像采集模式获得的黄斑厚度:方法:招募糖尿病患者,使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)模式和光学相干断层血管造影(OCTA)模式获取黄斑厚度。OCT 模式包括以眼窝为中心的黄斑立方体(512×128 像素),覆盖 6×6 平方毫米的黄斑区域。OCTA 采集以眼窝为中心扫描 6 × 6 平方毫米(350×350 像素)。数据根据早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)子区域导出并进行比较。固定偏差的定义是,OCT扫描和OCTA扫描中眼窝点与网格中心的偏差:被招募的 86 名糖尿病患者除了外上扇区外,所有 ETDRS 子区域的黄斑厚度都相似。两种模式的 95 % 一致性范围在 9.7μm 到 -9.0μm 之间。完成每个 OCTA 模式(中位数 7.4 秒)所需的时间比 OCT 模式(中位数 5.8 秒)长(Wilcoxon 检验,p < 0.001),但 OCTA 产生的固定偏差(中位数 68.8μm)比 OCT 模式(中位数 103.0μm)小(Wilcoxon 检验,p = 0.014):结论:与 OCT 相比,OCTA 的固定性明显提高,这可能是因为 OCTA 扫描速度更快,取样密度更高。黄斑厚度相似。似乎不需要使用单独的 OCT 模式来测量黄斑厚度。这种方法可以减少患者的坐诊时间,提高患者的舒适度,并简化临床工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of macular thickness in diabetic patients acquired from optical coherence tomography mode and optical coherence tomography angiography mode in Cirrus HD-OCT 5000

Purpose

To compare macular thickness obtained using two different modes of image acquisitions with Cirrus HD-OCT 5000.

Methods

Patients with diabetes were recruited and macular thickness were obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT) mode and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) mode. The OCT mode involved a Macular Cube (512×128 pixels) centred on the fovea covering a 6 × 6 mm2 macular region. The OCTA acquisition involved scanning of a 6 × 6 mm² scan (350×350 pixels) centred on the fovea. Data was exported and compared according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) subfields. Fixation deviation was defined as the deviation of the foveal point from the grid center in the OCT scan and OCTA scan.

Results

Eighty-six diabetic patients were recruited had similar macular thickness in all ETDRS subfield except the superior outer sector. The 95 % limits of agreement between the two modes were within 9.7μm to -9.0μm. It took longer to complete each OCTA mode (median of 7.4 s) than the OCT mode (median time of 5.8 s) (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001), but OCTA generated a smaller fixation deviation (median 68.8μm) than the OCT mode (median 103.0μm) (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.014).

Conclusions

Improved fixation in OCTA compared with OCT was evident, likely because of the faster scanning speed and higher sampling density of OCTA. Macular thickness was found similar. There appears no requirement to obtain macular thickness measurements using a separate OCT mode. This approach can reduce patient chair time, improve patient comfort, and streamline the clinical workflow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信