负压伤口疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡的效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Michel Marcos Dalmedico, Angela do Rocio Fedalto, Waleska Alves Martins, Chayane Karla Lucena de Carvalho, Beatriz Luci Fernandes, Sergio Ossamu Ioshii
{"title":"负压伤口疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡的效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Michel Marcos Dalmedico, Angela do Rocio Fedalto, Waleska Alves Martins, Chayane Karla Lucena de Carvalho, Beatriz Luci Fernandes, Sergio Ossamu Ioshii","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present devastating complications. Management of these wounds includes applying a vacuum device composed of a fenestrated tube embedded in a foam dressing and connected to a vacuum pump to collect the fluid in a vessel.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treating DFUs and evaluate the clinical outcomes of full and partial wound healing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted after searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that described the use of NPWT in the management of DFUs were included and compared with different interventions for the proposed outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies were included, 1 of which was later excluded during internal validation. Wound healing outcomes were analyzed in 2 studies, showing the superiority of total wound healing in the NPWT group. Ten studies compared the effect of different interventions on wound area reduction and 8 of these results were best with NPWT. Three studies showed clinical and statistical homogeneity (I² = 100%), making it possible to conduct a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the articles included in this systematic review have limitations regarding methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity, the results showed the potential benefit of NPWT in healing and wound area reduction. These outcomes are essential in the prevention of amputation in patients with DFU.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Michel Marcos Dalmedico, Angela do Rocio Fedalto, Waleska Alves Martins, Chayane Karla Lucena de Carvalho, Beatriz Luci Fernandes, Sergio Ossamu Ioshii\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present devastating complications. Management of these wounds includes applying a vacuum device composed of a fenestrated tube embedded in a foam dressing and connected to a vacuum pump to collect the fluid in a vessel.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treating DFUs and evaluate the clinical outcomes of full and partial wound healing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted after searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that described the use of NPWT in the management of DFUs were included and compared with different interventions for the proposed outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies were included, 1 of which was later excluded during internal validation. Wound healing outcomes were analyzed in 2 studies, showing the superiority of total wound healing in the NPWT group. Ten studies compared the effect of different interventions on wound area reduction and 8 of these results were best with NPWT. Three studies showed clinical and statistical homogeneity (I² = 100%), making it possible to conduct a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the articles included in this systematic review have limitations regarding methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity, the results showed the potential benefit of NPWT in healing and wound area reduction. These outcomes are essential in the prevention of amputation in patients with DFU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是一种破坏性并发症。处理这些伤口的方法包括使用真空装置,该装置由一根嵌入泡沫敷料并与真空泵相连的栅格管组成,用于将液体收集到一个容器中:回顾负压伤口疗法(NPWT)治疗DFU的有效性,并评估伤口完全愈合和部分愈合的临床效果:方法:通过搜索 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,对随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。结果:共纳入了 14 项研究,其中有 3 项研究的临床结果与 NPWT 的临床结果一致,有 2 项研究的临床结果与 NPWT 的临床结果一致:结果:共纳入 14 项研究,其中 1 项后来在内部验证时被排除。2项研究对伤口愈合结果进行了分析,结果显示NPWT组的伤口完全愈合效果更好。10 项研究比较了不同干预措施对缩小伤口面积的效果,其中 8 项研究结果显示 NPWT 效果最佳。三项研究显示出临床和统计上的同质性(I² = 100%),因此可以进行荟萃分析:尽管本系统性综述所收录的文章在方法质量和临床异质性方面存在局限性,但结果显示了 NPWT 对伤口愈合和减少伤口面积的潜在益处。这些结果对于预防DFU患者截肢至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present devastating complications. Management of these wounds includes applying a vacuum device composed of a fenestrated tube embedded in a foam dressing and connected to a vacuum pump to collect the fluid in a vessel.

Objective: To review the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treating DFUs and evaluate the clinical outcomes of full and partial wound healing.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted after searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that described the use of NPWT in the management of DFUs were included and compared with different interventions for the proposed outcomes.

Results: A total of 14 studies were included, 1 of which was later excluded during internal validation. Wound healing outcomes were analyzed in 2 studies, showing the superiority of total wound healing in the NPWT group. Ten studies compared the effect of different interventions on wound area reduction and 8 of these results were best with NPWT. Three studies showed clinical and statistical homogeneity (I² = 100%), making it possible to conduct a meta-analysis.

Conclusion: Although the articles included in this systematic review have limitations regarding methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity, the results showed the potential benefit of NPWT in healing and wound area reduction. These outcomes are essential in the prevention of amputation in patients with DFU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信