肢端肥大症的心肌力学:超声心动图研究的 Meta 分析。

IF 3.1 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Elisa Gherbesi, Andrea Faggiano, Carla Sala, Stefano Carugo, Guido Grassi, Cesare Cuspidi, Marijana Tadic
{"title":"肢端肥大症的心肌力学:超声心动图研究的 Meta 分析。","authors":"Elisa Gherbesi, Andrea Faggiano, Carla Sala, Stefano Carugo, Guido Grassi, Cesare Cuspidi, Marijana Tadic","doi":"10.1007/s40292-024-00667-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence on myocardial deformation, detected by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), in patients with acromegaly is scanty.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present meta-analysis was to provide an updated information on left ventricular (LV) systolic function assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with acromegaly and preserved LVEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches were conducted across bibliographic databases (Pub-Med, OVID, EMBASE and Cochrane library) to identify eligible studies from inception up to June 30-2024. Clinical studies published in English reporting data on LV mechanics in patients with acromegaly and controls were included. The statistical difference of the echocardiographic variables of interest between groups such as LVEF and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated by standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies including 288 patients with acromegaly and 294 healthy individuals were considered for the analysis. Pooled average LVEF values were 64.6 ± 1.5% in the healthy control group and 64.0 ± 1.3% in the acromegaly group (SMD: - 0.21 ± 0.22, CI -0.62/0.22, p = 0.34); the corresponding values of GLS were - 19.1.1 ± 1.2% and - 17.5 ± 1.2% (SMD: -0.52 ± 0.27, CI - 1.05/0.01, p = 0.05). No difference was found between the two groups for both global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with acromegaly in which LVEF is completely comparable to healthy controls show an impairment in GLS of borderline statistical significance. Whether GLS assessment can actually unmask early alterations of systolic function in patients with acromegaly better than LVEF will need to be investigated by future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12890,"journal":{"name":"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"451-459"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myocardial Mechanics in Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis of Echocardiographic Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Gherbesi, Andrea Faggiano, Carla Sala, Stefano Carugo, Guido Grassi, Cesare Cuspidi, Marijana Tadic\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40292-024-00667-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence on myocardial deformation, detected by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), in patients with acromegaly is scanty.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present meta-analysis was to provide an updated information on left ventricular (LV) systolic function assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with acromegaly and preserved LVEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches were conducted across bibliographic databases (Pub-Med, OVID, EMBASE and Cochrane library) to identify eligible studies from inception up to June 30-2024. Clinical studies published in English reporting data on LV mechanics in patients with acromegaly and controls were included. The statistical difference of the echocardiographic variables of interest between groups such as LVEF and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated by standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies including 288 patients with acromegaly and 294 healthy individuals were considered for the analysis. Pooled average LVEF values were 64.6 ± 1.5% in the healthy control group and 64.0 ± 1.3% in the acromegaly group (SMD: - 0.21 ± 0.22, CI -0.62/0.22, p = 0.34); the corresponding values of GLS were - 19.1.1 ± 1.2% and - 17.5 ± 1.2% (SMD: -0.52 ± 0.27, CI - 1.05/0.01, p = 0.05). No difference was found between the two groups for both global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with acromegaly in which LVEF is completely comparable to healthy controls show an impairment in GLS of borderline statistical significance. Whether GLS assessment can actually unmask early alterations of systolic function in patients with acromegaly better than LVEF will need to be investigated by future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"451-459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00667-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00667-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:目的:本荟萃分析旨在提供通过全局纵向应变(GLS)评估肢端肥大症患者左心室收缩功能的最新信息:按照 PRISMA 指南,在文献数据库(Pub-Med、OVID、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆)中进行了系统检索,以确定从开始到 2024 年 6 月 30 日期间符合条件的研究。研究纳入了以英语发表的、报告肢端肥大症患者和对照组左心室力学数据的临床研究。采用随机效应模型,以标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)计算各组间相关超声心动图变量(如LVEF和整体纵向应变(GLS))的统计学差异:分析考虑了七项研究,包括 288 名肢端肥大症患者和 294 名健康人。健康对照组的 LVEF 汇总平均值为 64.6 ± 1.5%,肢端肥大症组为 64.0 ± 1.3%(SMD:- 0.21 ± 0.22,CI -0.62/0.22,P = 0.34);GLS 的相应值分别为 - 19.1.1 ± 1.2% 和 - 17.5 ± 1.2%(SMD:-0.52 ± 0.27,CI -1.05/0.01,P = 0.05)。两组患者的全周应变(GCS)和全桡侧应变(GRS)均无差异:我们的研究结果表明,虽然肢端肥大症患者的 LVEF 与健康对照组完全相当,但他们的 GLS 却出现了边缘统计学意义的损伤。GLS 评估是否能比 LVEF 更好地揭示肢端肥大症患者收缩功能的早期改变,还需要在今后的研究中进行探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Myocardial Mechanics in Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis of Echocardiographic Studies.

Introduction: Evidence on myocardial deformation, detected by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), in patients with acromegaly is scanty.

Aim: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to provide an updated information on left ventricular (LV) systolic function assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with acromegaly and preserved LVEF.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches were conducted across bibliographic databases (Pub-Med, OVID, EMBASE and Cochrane library) to identify eligible studies from inception up to June 30-2024. Clinical studies published in English reporting data on LV mechanics in patients with acromegaly and controls were included. The statistical difference of the echocardiographic variables of interest between groups such as LVEF and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated by standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by using random-effects models.

Results: Seven studies including 288 patients with acromegaly and 294 healthy individuals were considered for the analysis. Pooled average LVEF values were 64.6 ± 1.5% in the healthy control group and 64.0 ± 1.3% in the acromegaly group (SMD: - 0.21 ± 0.22, CI -0.62/0.22, p = 0.34); the corresponding values of GLS were - 19.1.1 ± 1.2% and - 17.5 ± 1.2% (SMD: -0.52 ± 0.27, CI - 1.05/0.01, p = 0.05). No difference was found between the two groups for both global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with acromegaly in which LVEF is completely comparable to healthy controls show an impairment in GLS of borderline statistical significance. Whether GLS assessment can actually unmask early alterations of systolic function in patients with acromegaly better than LVEF will need to be investigated by future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention promotes knowledge, update and discussion in the field of hypertension and cardiovascular disease prevention, by providing a regular programme of independent review articles covering key aspects of the management of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The journal includes:   Invited ''State of the Art'' reviews.  Expert commentaries on guidelines, major trials, technical advances.Presentation of new intervention trials design.''Pros and Cons'' or round tables on controversial issues.Statements on guidelines from hypertension and cardiovascular scientific societies.Socio-economic issues.Cost/benefit in prevention of cardiovascular diseases.Monitoring of healthcare systems.News and views from the Italian Society of Hypertension (including abstracts).All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信