吸入式抗生素对呼吸机相关肺炎的预防作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Wan-Hsuan Hsu, Jheng-Yan Wu, Bo-Wen Shiau, Po-Yu Huang, Min-Hsiang Chuang, Ya-Wen Tsai, Ting-Hui Liu, Hung-Jen Tang, Chih-Cheng Lai
{"title":"吸入式抗生素对呼吸机相关肺炎的预防作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wan-Hsuan Hsu, Jheng-Yan Wu, Bo-Wen Shiau, Po-Yu Huang, Min-Hsiang Chuang, Ya-Wen Tsai, Ting-Hui Liu, Hung-Jen Tang, Chih-Cheng Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) constitutes a considerable challenge for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and necessitates the development of effective preventive strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for preventing VAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until January 21, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for VAP prevention were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs, involving 1465 patients, of whom 734 were classified as the study group receiving inhaled antibiotics and 731 as the control group receiving placebo were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the occurrence of VAP was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (risk ratio [RR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.92). However, there were no significant differences in mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.09), length of stay in ICU (mean difference [MD], 0.10 days; 95% CI, -0.91 to 1.1) and hospital (MD, 0.30 days; 95% CI, -1.82 to 2.43), and mechanical ventilation (MV) duration (MD, 0.45 days; 95% CI, -0.45 to 1.35) between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inhaled antibiotics hold promise for mitigating the risk of VAP among critically ill patients. However, their impact on mortality, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and MV duration was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The preventive effect of inhaled antibiotic against ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wan-Hsuan Hsu, Jheng-Yan Wu, Bo-Wen Shiau, Po-Yu Huang, Min-Hsiang Chuang, Ya-Wen Tsai, Ting-Hui Liu, Hung-Jen Tang, Chih-Cheng Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) constitutes a considerable challenge for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and necessitates the development of effective preventive strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for preventing VAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until January 21, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for VAP prevention were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs, involving 1465 patients, of whom 734 were classified as the study group receiving inhaled antibiotics and 731 as the control group receiving placebo were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the occurrence of VAP was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (risk ratio [RR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.92). However, there were no significant differences in mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.09), length of stay in ICU (mean difference [MD], 0.10 days; 95% CI, -0.91 to 1.1) and hospital (MD, 0.30 days; 95% CI, -1.82 to 2.43), and mechanical ventilation (MV) duration (MD, 0.45 days; 95% CI, -0.45 to 1.35) between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inhaled antibiotics hold promise for mitigating the risk of VAP among critically ill patients. However, their impact on mortality, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and MV duration was not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107324\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是重症监护病房(ICU)患者面临的一大挑战,因此有必要制定有效的预防策略。本研究旨在评估吸入性抗生素预防 VAP 的临床疗效:方法:检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,截止日期为 2024 年 1 月 21 日。纳入了研究吸入性抗生素预防 VAP 临床疗效的随机对照试验(RCT):本次荟萃分析共纳入了 7 项随机对照试验,涉及 1465 名患者,其中 734 名患者被列为接受吸入抗生素治疗的研究组,731 名患者被列为接受安慰剂治疗的对照组。总体而言,研究组的 VAP 发生率明显低于对照组(风险比 [RR],0.69;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.51 至 0.92)。然而,研究组与对照组在死亡率(RR,0.90;95% CI,0.74-1.09)、重症监护室住院时间(平均差[MD],0.10天;95% CI,-0.91-1.1)和住院时间(MD,0.30天;95% CI,-1.82-2.43)以及机械通气(MV)持续时间(MD,0.45天;95% CI,-0.45-1.35)方面没有明显差异:吸入式抗生素有望降低重症患者发生 VAP 的风险。结论:吸入式抗生素有望降低重症患者的 VAP 风险,但其对死亡率、重症监护室和住院时间以及 MV 持续时间的影响在统计学上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The preventive effect of inhaled antibiotic against ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) constitutes a considerable challenge for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and necessitates the development of effective preventive strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for preventing VAP.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until January 21, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for VAP prevention were included.

Results: Seven RCTs, involving 1465 patients, of whom 734 were classified as the study group receiving inhaled antibiotics and 731 as the control group receiving placebo were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the occurrence of VAP was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (risk ratio [RR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.92). However, there were no significant differences in mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.09), length of stay in ICU (mean difference [MD], 0.10 days; 95% CI, -0.91 to 1.1) and hospital (MD, 0.30 days; 95% CI, -1.82 to 2.43), and mechanical ventilation (MV) duration (MD, 0.45 days; 95% CI, -0.45 to 1.35) between groups.

Conclusion: Inhaled antibiotics hold promise for mitigating the risk of VAP among critically ill patients. However, their impact on mortality, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and MV duration was not statistically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信