肠道微生物群与强直性脊柱炎的风险。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Clinical Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s10067-024-07102-3
Xiaofang Jiang, Manli Wang, Bin Liu, Hong Yang, Jiadong Ren, Shuhui Chen, Ding Ye, Shaoxue Yang, Yingying Mao
{"title":"肠道微生物群与强直性脊柱炎的风险。","authors":"Xiaofang Jiang, Manli Wang, Bin Liu, Hong Yang, Jiadong Ren, Shuhui Chen, Ding Ye, Shaoxue Yang, Yingying Mao","doi":"10.1007/s10067-024-07102-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Observational studies have established a connection between gut microbiota and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) risk; however, whether the observed associations are causal remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to assess the potential causal associations of gut microbiota with AS risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Instrumental variants of gut microbiota were obtained from the MiBioGen consortium (n = 18,340) and the Dutch Microbiome Project (n = 7738). The FinnGen consortium provided genetic association summary statistics for AS, encompassing 2860 cases and 270,964 controls. We used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method as the primary analysis, supplemented with the weighted median method, maximum likelihood-based method, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test, and MR-Egger regression. In addition, we conducted a reverse MR analysis to assess the likelihood of reverse causality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the Bonferroni correction, species Bacteroides vulgatus remained statistically significantly associated with AS risk (odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-1.95, P = 2.55 × 10<sup>-4</sup>). Suggestive evidence of associations of eleven bacterial traits with AS risk was also observed (P < 0.05 by IVW). Among them, eight were associated with an elevated AS risk (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.74, P = 0.011 for phylum Verrucomicrobia; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for class Verrucomicrobiae; OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36, P = 0.035 for order Bacillales; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for order Verrucomicrobiales; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.82, P = 0.003 for family Alcaligenaceae; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for family Verrucomicrobiaceae; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for genus Akkermansia; OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19-2.02, P = 0.001 for species Sutterella wadsworthensis). Three traits exhibited a negative association with AS risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, P = 0.003 for genus Dialister; OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97, P = 0.020 for genus Howardella; OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, P = 0.026 for genus Oscillospira). Consistent associations were observed when employing alternate MR methods. In the reverse MR, no statistically significant correlations were detected between AS and these bacterial traits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results revealed the associations of several gut bacterial traits with AS risk, suggesting a potential causal role of gut microbiota in AS development. Nevertheless, additional research is required to clarify the mechanisms by which these bacteria influence AS risk. Key Points • The association of gut microbiota with AS risk in observational studies is unclear. • This MR analysis revealed associations of 12 gut bacterial traits with AS risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut microbiota and risk of ankylosing spondylitis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofang Jiang, Manli Wang, Bin Liu, Hong Yang, Jiadong Ren, Shuhui Chen, Ding Ye, Shaoxue Yang, Yingying Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10067-024-07102-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Observational studies have established a connection between gut microbiota and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) risk; however, whether the observed associations are causal remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to assess the potential causal associations of gut microbiota with AS risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Instrumental variants of gut microbiota were obtained from the MiBioGen consortium (n = 18,340) and the Dutch Microbiome Project (n = 7738). The FinnGen consortium provided genetic association summary statistics for AS, encompassing 2860 cases and 270,964 controls. We used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method as the primary analysis, supplemented with the weighted median method, maximum likelihood-based method, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test, and MR-Egger regression. In addition, we conducted a reverse MR analysis to assess the likelihood of reverse causality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the Bonferroni correction, species Bacteroides vulgatus remained statistically significantly associated with AS risk (odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-1.95, P = 2.55 × 10<sup>-4</sup>). Suggestive evidence of associations of eleven bacterial traits with AS risk was also observed (P < 0.05 by IVW). Among them, eight were associated with an elevated AS risk (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.74, P = 0.011 for phylum Verrucomicrobia; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for class Verrucomicrobiae; OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36, P = 0.035 for order Bacillales; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for order Verrucomicrobiales; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.82, P = 0.003 for family Alcaligenaceae; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for family Verrucomicrobiaceae; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for genus Akkermansia; OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19-2.02, P = 0.001 for species Sutterella wadsworthensis). Three traits exhibited a negative association with AS risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, P = 0.003 for genus Dialister; OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97, P = 0.020 for genus Howardella; OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, P = 0.026 for genus Oscillospira). Consistent associations were observed when employing alternate MR methods. In the reverse MR, no statistically significant correlations were detected between AS and these bacterial traits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results revealed the associations of several gut bacterial traits with AS risk, suggesting a potential causal role of gut microbiota in AS development. Nevertheless, additional research is required to clarify the mechanisms by which these bacteria influence AS risk. Key Points • The association of gut microbiota with AS risk in observational studies is unclear. • This MR analysis revealed associations of 12 gut bacterial traits with AS risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07102-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07102-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:观察性研究确定了肠道微生物群与强直性脊柱炎(AS)风险之间的联系;然而,观察到的联系是否是因果关系仍不清楚。因此,我们进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以评估肠道微生物群与强直性脊柱炎风险之间的潜在因果关系:肠道微生物群的工具变异来自 MiBioGen 联盟(n = 18340)和荷兰微生物组项目(n = 7738)。芬兰基因联盟提供了强直性脊柱炎的遗传关联汇总统计数据,包括2860例病例和270964例对照。我们使用反方差加权(IVW)法作为主要分析方法,并辅以加权中位数法、基于最大似然法、MR 多向性残差和离群检验以及 MR-Egger 回归。此外,我们还进行了反向 MR 分析,以评估反向因果关系的可能性:结果:经 Bonferroni 校正后,菌种 Bacteroides vulgatus 与强直性脊柱炎风险仍有显著的统计学相关性(几率比(OR)1.55,95% 置信区间(CI)1.22-1.95,P = 2.55 × 10-4)。此外,还观察到 11 种细菌性状与强直性脊柱炎风险相关的提示性证据(P 结论):我们的研究结果揭示了多种肠道细菌性状与强直性脊柱炎风险的相关性,表明肠道微生物群在强直性脊柱炎的发病中可能起着因果作用。然而,还需要进一步的研究来阐明这些细菌影响强直性脊柱炎风险的机制。要点 - 在观察性研究中,肠道微生物群与强直性脊柱炎风险的关系尚不明确。- 这项磁共振分析揭示了12种肠道细菌性状与强直性脊柱炎风险的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gut microbiota and risk of ankylosing spondylitis.

Gut microbiota and risk of ankylosing spondylitis.

Objective: Observational studies have established a connection between gut microbiota and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) risk; however, whether the observed associations are causal remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to assess the potential causal associations of gut microbiota with AS risk.

Methods: Instrumental variants of gut microbiota were obtained from the MiBioGen consortium (n = 18,340) and the Dutch Microbiome Project (n = 7738). The FinnGen consortium provided genetic association summary statistics for AS, encompassing 2860 cases and 270,964 controls. We used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method as the primary analysis, supplemented with the weighted median method, maximum likelihood-based method, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test, and MR-Egger regression. In addition, we conducted a reverse MR analysis to assess the likelihood of reverse causality.

Results: After the Bonferroni correction, species Bacteroides vulgatus remained statistically significantly associated with AS risk (odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-1.95, P = 2.55 × 10-4). Suggestive evidence of associations of eleven bacterial traits with AS risk was also observed (P < 0.05 by IVW). Among them, eight were associated with an elevated AS risk (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.74, P = 0.011 for phylum Verrucomicrobia; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for class Verrucomicrobiae; OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36, P = 0.035 for order Bacillales; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for order Verrucomicrobiales; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.82, P = 0.003 for family Alcaligenaceae; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for family Verrucomicrobiaceae; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026 for genus Akkermansia; OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19-2.02, P = 0.001 for species Sutterella wadsworthensis). Three traits exhibited a negative association with AS risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, P = 0.003 for genus Dialister; OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97, P = 0.020 for genus Howardella; OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, P = 0.026 for genus Oscillospira). Consistent associations were observed when employing alternate MR methods. In the reverse MR, no statistically significant correlations were detected between AS and these bacterial traits.

Conclusion: Our results revealed the associations of several gut bacterial traits with AS risk, suggesting a potential causal role of gut microbiota in AS development. Nevertheless, additional research is required to clarify the mechanisms by which these bacteria influence AS risk. Key Points • The association of gut microbiota with AS risk in observational studies is unclear. • This MR analysis revealed associations of 12 gut bacterial traits with AS risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信